Software Alternatives & Startups

AuditHub VS Requestly

Compare AuditHub VS Requestly and see what are their differences

AuditHub

Continuous security platform for smart contracts and ZK circuits. Static analysis, fuzzing, and formal verification in one integrated workflow.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
$10,000 / Annually
Requestly

A Powerful API Mocking and Testing Tool

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Requestly seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 35 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 35
Web3 popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
5 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

AuditHub
Requestly
Website audithub.dev requestly.com
Pricing
$10,000 / Annually
Open source Freemium Free trial Official pricing
Platforms —
Google Chrome Firefox Edge Safari Brave Opera Vivaldi Android Windows Linux Mac OSX MacOS +9
Company Startup from the United States · 2025 Startup from the United States · 20 - 49 employees · 2021
Listed in

About AuditHub and Requestly

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

AuditHub
Requestly

AuditHub is a blockchain security platform that provides continuous automated security for smart contracts and zero-knowledge circuits. Built by Veridise, AuditHub combines four proprietary tools: Vanguard (smart contract static analysis), OrCa (specification-guided fuzzing), Picus (ZK circuit...

Read more about AuditHub

Requestly is a modern and powerful companion for API Development and Testing. It is an open-source tool purpose-built to speed up and simplify API development workflow for developers and QAs. It is a combination of API Client and HTTP Interceptor that helps create and share API Contracts, testing...

Read more about Requestly

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

AuditHub 5 features
Requestly 15 features
  • Centralized Audit Marketplace
    AuditHub appears to function as a platform connecting projects with security auditors, streamlining the process of finding and engaging qualified smart contract auditors in one place rather than searching across multiple channels.
  • Standardized Process
    Having a dedicated platform for audits can help standardize the request, review, and delivery process, making it easier for both auditors and clients to track progress and maintain consistent documentation.
  • Web3/Crypto Focus
    Being specifically tailored to blockchain and smart contract auditing means the platform likely includes features and terminology relevant to this niche, rather than generic security services that may not understand crypto-specific vulnerabilities.
  • Potential Time Savings
    By aggregating auditors and audit requests, the platform could reduce the time projects spend vetting and negotiating with individual auditing firms or freelancers.
  • Transparency Features
    Platforms like this often include reputation systems, past audit history, or reviews that can help clients make more informed decisions when selecting an auditor.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Public Information
    There is relatively little publicly available detailed information about AuditHub's specific features, pricing, and track record, making it difficult to fully evaluate the platform before committing to use it.
  • Market Competition
    The smart contract auditing space has several established players and platforms, so AuditHub may face challenges differentiating itself and attracting a critical mass of quality auditors and clients.
  • Dependency on Auditor Quality
    As with any marketplace model, the platform's value is heavily dependent on the quality and availability of auditors who join it, which can be inconsistent especially in a newer platform.
  • Niche Applicability
    The platform is specifically designed for blockchain/smart contract audits, so it would not be useful for general software security audits or other types of code review needs.
  • Trust and Verification Concerns
    New or lesser-known audit platforms may face skepticism from the community regarding the verification process for auditors and the reliability of audit results, which is critical in a space where security failures can lead to significant financial losses.
  • Redirect URL
  • Block Network Requests
  • Modify Request & Response Header
  • Modify Response
  • Supercharge Selenium
  • Session Replay
  • Modify Query Params
  • Team Workspace
  • API Client
  • API Mocks
  • GraphQL Support
  • Zero Setup
  • Auto Capture Sessions
  • Network Logs
  • Console Logs

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

AuditHub
Requestly

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified information about AuditHub (audithub.dev) in my knowledge base, so I can't confirm its quality, features, or reliability. Before adopting it, verify its legitimacy and capabilities through independent research.

Why this product is good

  • No confirmed data available on this specific product's features, security practices, or user feedback
  • Unable to verify company legitimacy, funding status, or operational history
  • Cannot confirm claims about functionality without independent verification
  • Recommend checking sources like G2, Capterra, or Trustpilot for real user reviews
  • Consider testing with a free trial or sandbox environment if available

Recommended for

  • Anyone considering this tool should first verify its legitimacy through domain registration lookup and company research
  • Users should check for security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001) if handling sensitive audit data
  • Best suited for those willing to conduct their own due diligence before committing
  • Teams should test with non-critical data first if a trial is offered

Overall verdict

  • Requestly is generally regarded as a good tool due to its comprehensive functionalities and ease of use. Its ability to seamlessly manage network requests makes it suitable for both beginners and experienced developers.

Why this product is good

  • Requestly is widely considered a valuable tool because it offers robust and flexible features for intercepting and modifying network requests. Developers and QA testers appreciate it for its ability to simulate and debug API calls efficiently. It is particularly useful for testing changes without altering the codebase and for working with web applications in development and production environments.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to debug and test API endpoints.
  • Quality Assurance (QA) teams that require reliable testing tools for web applications.
  • Technical professionals who manage network traffic and need to modify or redirect requests effortlessly.
  • Anyone involved in web development who needs to simulate network conditions or test application behavior under different scenarios.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

AuditHub 0 videos + Add
Requestly 5 videos + Add

No AuditHub videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Get Started with Requestly

More videos

  • - Session Replays by Requestly
  • - Modify API Response using Requestly Chrome Extension
  • - How to load local JS file in production sites for faster debugging (Map Local Tool)
  • - Report Quality Bugs with Video, Network logs, Console logs & Environment details

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
AuditHub
Requestly
100% 100%
0% 0%
5% 5%
95% 95%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing AuditHub and Requestly.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

AuditHub's answer

  • Linea
  • RISC ZERO
  • Succint

Requestly's answer:

  • Verizon
  • AT&T
  • Adobe
  • Salesforce
  • Telegraph
  • Intuit
  • Verizon

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Requestly's answer:

Front-end developers, QAs, PMs, Digital Marketers

What makes your product unique?

Requestly's answer:

Requestly is an open-source API development and testing tool that combines the capabilities of an API Client and HTTP Interceptor, making it a better alternative to Postman + Charles Proxy. It simplifies API mocking, request modification, and debugging with an intuitive no-code interface, enabling developers and QAs to test APIs efficiently.

What's the story behind your product?

AuditHub's answer

The tools in AuditHub trace directly to the UToPiA research group at UT Austin, led by Professor Isil Dillig. Starting in 2018, program analysis for smart contracts became a central research focus. The result: peer-reviewed breakthroughs that now run in production.

User comments

Share your experience with using AuditHub and Requestly. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

AuditHub no reviews yet
Requestly no reviews yet

We have no reviews of AuditHub yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

AuditHub 0 mentions
Requestly 35 mentions

Tracking AuditHub since Dec 2025.

View more

Alternatives to AuditHub and Requestly

When comparing AuditHub and Requestly, you can also consider the following products.