
Auphonic
Descript
Alitu
Riverside.fm
Xound.io
AudioLinter analyzes podcast audio to EBU R128 and one-click-repairs it to -16 LUFS with true peak below -1 dBTP, right inside WordPress. Uploaded files are deleted within 48 hours on EU servers.

SourceForge.net: ShellNewHandler details page

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ShellNewHandler seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | audiolinter.com | sourceforge.net |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of AudioLinter yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing AudioLinter and ShellNewHandler.
AudioLinter's answer
Most loudness tools are standalone apps or require exporting to an external service. AudioLinter runs where podcasters already publish — WordPress — and fixes the file in place. EU-hosted, uploaded audio deleted within 48 hours, free analysis tier with no card required.
AudioLinter's answer
It checks and fixes podcast loudness (EBU R128, −16 LUFS), true peak (−1 dBTP) and dead air directly inside the WordPress post editor — no separate app, no file upload to a third-party dashboard. One-click repair, not just a report.
AudioLinter's answer
Built by a solo developer in Germany who kept seeing podcast episodes rejected or downranked for loudness/true-peak issues that a simple automated check could catch before publishing. Built directly into the WordPress workflow podcasters already use.
AudioLinter's answer
PHP/WordPress plugin frontend, Python/FastAPI backend for audio analysis (EBU R128 loudness, true-peak metering), Next.js marketing/account site, self-hosted on Hetzner (EU).
AudioLinter's answer
Independent podcasters and small podcast networks who self-host on WordPress (often via Podlove or similar plugins) and want their episodes to meet Spotify/Apple/YouTube loudness specs without hiring an audio engineer.
Share your experience with using AudioLinter and ShellNewHandler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking AudioLinter since Jul 2026.
Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu. Source: about 4 years ago
I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible. Source: over 5 years ago
When comparing AudioLinter and ShellNewHandler, you can also consider the following products.

The automatic audio post production webservice, using signal processing and machine learning techniques.
Compare Auphonic to AudioLinter or ShellNewHandler:

Text-based audio editor and automated transcription
Compare Descript to AudioLinter or ShellNewHandler:

Your automated podcast producer - edit, brand, publish
Compare Alitu to AudioLinter or ShellNewHandler:

🎙 Easily to record remote podcasts and video interviews that look and sound like they were recorded in a professional recording studio.
Compare Riverside.fm to AudioLinter or ShellNewHandler:

Discover Xound, the cutting-edge AI Sound Enhancement System designed for content creators. Elevate your audio quality effortlessly, attracting more viewers and boosting engagement.
Compare Xound.io to AudioLinter or ShellNewHandler: