Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Atril VS ManualTesting.dev

Compare Atril VS ManualTesting.dev and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Atril logo Atril

Atril is a simple multi-page document viewer. Atril is a fork of Evince.

ManualTesting.dev logo ManualTesting.dev

Manual Testing for Developers - Test Management Tool for developers and startups
  • Atril Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22
  • ManualTesting.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-26

Atril features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Atril is designed to be a lightweight document viewer, making it fast and efficient with system resources. This is particularly beneficial for older or less powerful computers.
  • MATE Integration
    As part of the MATE desktop environment, Atril is well-integrated and maintains a consistent look and feel with other MATE applications, providing a seamless user experience.
  • Multiple Format Support
    Atril supports a variety of document formats, including PDF, PostScript, DjVu, DVI, and XPS, making it a versatile tool for viewing different kinds of documents.
  • Open Source
    Atril is open-source software, allowing users to freely inspect, modify, and distribute the software. This fosters transparency and community contributions.

Possible disadvantages of Atril

  • Limited Features
    Compared to some other document viewers, Atril may have fewer advanced features, such as extensive annotation tools or advanced search capabilities.
  • MATE Dependency
    While Atril can be used outside the MATE desktop environment, it is specifically designed for MATE, meaning it may not integrate as well with other desktop environments.
  • Occasional Lag with Large Files
    Users may experience some performance lag when opening very large documents, which can affect usability.
  • Development Pace
    Being part of a community-driven project, Atril's development and updates can be slower compared to commercial software with dedicated development teams.

ManualTesting.dev features and specs

  • Focused on Manual Testing
    ManualTesting.dev is specifically dedicated to manual testing, providing a niche resource for QA professionals who need to strengthen their manual testing skills rather than being overwhelmed by automation-focused content.
  • Beginner-Friendly
    The platform appears designed to be accessible for those new to software testing, offering foundational knowledge and guidance that helps newcomers enter the QA field without requiring prior technical expertise.
  • Structured Learning Path
    The site offers organized content that guides learners through manual testing concepts in a logical progression, making it easier to build knowledge incrementally rather than jumping between disconnected topics.
  • Practical and Job-Oriented
    The platform focuses on practical, real-world manual testing skills that are directly applicable to job roles, helping testers prepare for actual work scenarios and interviews in QA positions.
  • Free or Affordable Access
    ManualTesting.dev provides accessible content without significant financial barriers, making it a cost-effective option for individuals looking to learn manual testing without investing in expensive courses or certifications.

Possible disadvantages of ManualTesting.dev

  • Limited Scope
    By focusing exclusively on manual testing, the platform may not adequately prepare testers for the modern QA landscape where automation skills are increasingly expected and valued by employers.
  • Relatively Unknown Platform
    ManualTesting.dev is not as well-established or widely recognized as major learning platforms like Udemy, Coursera, or ISTQB resources, which may limit community support and peer interaction.
  • Limited Advanced Content
    The platform may lack depth for experienced QA professionals looking for advanced testing methodologies, complex test strategy development, or specialized domain testing knowledge.
  • Smaller Community
    Compared to larger testing communities like Ministry of Testing or Software Testing Help, the platform likely has a smaller user base, resulting in fewer discussion opportunities, peer reviews, and networking possibilities.
  • Content Freshness Concerns
    As a smaller, niche website, there may be concerns about how frequently the content is updated to reflect current industry trends, tools, and best practices in manual testing.

Analysis of Atril

Overall verdict

  • Atril is considered a good option for users looking for a straightforward, reliable document viewer integrated with the MATE desktop environment. It offers essential features required for everyday document viewing tasks and is consistently maintained as part of the MATE project.

Why this product is good

  • Atril, a document viewer that is part of the MATE desktop environment, is appreciated for its simplicity and efficiency. It supports a wide range of document formats including PDF, PostScript, DJVU, and many others. Atril is lightweight, making it an excellent choice for users who prefer minimal resource consumption without sacrificing functionality.

Recommended for

    Atril is recommended for users who utilize the MATE desktop environment or those who need a fast and efficient document viewer that does not hog system resources. It's especially suitable for Linux users who appreciate the traditional desktop experience provided by MATE.

Analysis of ManualTesting.dev

Overall verdict

  • ManualTesting.dev appears to be a niche resource site focused on manual testing concepts, tutorials, and interview preparation for QA professionals. It's a solid, budget-friendly (often free) option for learners wanting to build foundational manual testing skills, though it may lack the depth, interactivity, or certification value of paid, structured courses.

Why this product is good

  • Provides free or low-cost access to manual testing concepts and materials, making it accessible for beginners
  • Focuses specifically on manual testing, offering targeted content rather than generic QA overviews
  • Often includes practical examples, sample test cases, and interview questions useful for job seekers
  • Simple, straightforward format that's easy to digest without needing extensive technical setup
  • Useful as a supplementary study resource alongside other QA learning platforms

Recommended for

  • Beginners entering the QA/software testing field looking for foundational knowledge
  • Job seekers preparing for manual testing interview questions
  • Students or self-learners who want free supplementary material on testing concepts
  • QA professionals needing a quick refresher on manual testing fundamentals
  • Those on a tight budget who can't afford premium testing courses or bootcamps

Atril videos

+ Add

Me comprรฉ un atril! - PDP CS800 #Review

More videos:

  • Review - REVIEW / Atril de platillo HC33BW con boom Tama
  • Review - Review: Wostoo Teclado Electrรณnico Piano 61 Teclas con Atril y Microfono

ManualTesting.dev videos

No ManualTesting.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Atril and ManualTesting.dev)

Atril

ManualTesting.dev

PDF Editor
100 100%
PDF Editor
0% 0
Software Development Tools
0 0%
Software Development Tools
100% 100
Office & Productivity
100 100%
Office & Productivity
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
Software Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Atril and ManualTesting.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Atril seems to be a lot more popular than ManualTesting.dev. While we know about 23 links to Atril, we've tracked only 1 mention of ManualTesting.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Atril mentions (23)

  • KDE celebrates the 29th birthday and kicks off the yearly fundraiser
    MATE was forked around the time GNOME 3 was released and is still going. https://mate-desktop.org Some people consider Cinnamon to be a GNOME 2 spiritual successor while still using a lot of GNOME 3 stuff under the hood. https://projects.linuxmint.com/cinnamon/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • SerenityOS is a love letter to '90s user interfaces
    The closest I know of is Blue95. I have only run the live environment but it worked pretty well and was impressive. "Blue95 is a modern and lightweight desktop experience that is reminiscent of a bygone era of computing. Based on Fedora Atomic Xfce with the Chicago95 theme." https://github.com/winblues/blue95 And if you like Gnome 2.x, there's MATE: https://mate-desktop.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Systemd Rolling Out "run0" As sudo Alternative
    I don't know if you are DE shopping, but I've been very happy for the past few years with the MATE Desktop Environment, which "...is the continuation of GNOME 2. It provides an intuitive and attractive desktop environment using traditional metaphors for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems." https://mate-desktop.org/ Among a great number of things I really like, I will mention that Caja, the MATE version of... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Lobotomizing Gnome
    I agree that there is a balance between customization and "cleanness" in design and implementation. However, I think the GNOME 3 and 4 designers went too far and alienated many users: https://www.zdnet.com/article/linus-torvalds-finds-gnome-3-4-to-be-a-total-user-experience-design-failure/ https://medium.com/@fulalas/gnome-42-the-nonsense-continues-7d96c3287f7... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • I Still Use Windows 95 (archived, 2008)
    > Is there a WM out there that can do the basic quality-of-life functions of today's DEs? I'd love a simple, opinionated WM that takes the features we know are useful today (workspaces, expo mode, sensible file manager layouts, system trays) and gives them a color-adjustable window theme inspired by 90's aesthetics, with minimal compositing that can run fast on hardware as minimal as a prototype RISC-V board. Or... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
View more

ManualTesting.dev mentions (1)

  • How I improved my confidence, code quality and became a better developer
    We built ManualTesting.dev, a simple and powerful tool, to help my team and people like me write code, test it, and deliver on time with confidence. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Atril and ManualTesting.dev, you can also consider the following products

Evince - Evince is a document viewer for multiple document formats: PDF, Postscript, djvu, tiff, dvi, XPS...

PDF Reader Pro - PDF Reader Pro is an all-in-one PDF office supporting to Read, Annotate, Edit, OCR, Convert, Create & Fill Form, Sign PDFs, TTS on Mac, iOS, Android, and Windows.

ApowerPDF - ApowerPDF is a versatile PDF editor which also features as PDF converter, viewer, creator and more. It provides a perfect solution for all users.

Icecream Apps PDF Editor - Excellent powerful tool to edit PDF, annotate PDF, redact, protect and more.

Win PDF Editor - Win PDF Editor is a lightweight PDF editor that lets you create, edit, modify and convert PDF files on your computer.

SwifDoo PDF - Looking for methods to edit, merge, split, convert, rotate, annotate and other related manipulate on PDF? SwifDoo PDF will match your needs and handle most of your PDF-related jobs.

Loading...