Software Alternatives & Startups

AstroPrint VS @imqueue

Compare AstroPrint VS @imqueue and see what are their differences

AstroPrint

Slice, Store, and Print your 3D files from any web enabled device.

Rating
0 reviews
@imqueue

RPC over an inter-communication messaging queue for service-oriented Node & TypeScript back-ends. Self-describing services generate their own clients — no boilerplate, no service discovery, no load balancer.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, AstroPrint seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 4 times since March 2021.

social mentions
4 vs 0
3D popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
52 vs 2

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

AstroPrint
@imqueue
Website astroprint.com imqueue.org
Pricing —
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

AstroPrint 5 features
@imqueue 5 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    AstroPrint provides an intuitive and easy-to-use interface that is suitable for both beginners and advanced users in 3D printing. Its dashboard simplifies print management, making it accessible for users of all experience levels.
  • Cloud-Based Management
    With cloud-based functionality, users can manage and monitor their 3D printers remotely, even from mobile devices. This allows for increased flexibility and convenience, as you can start, stop, and adjust prints from anywhere with an internet connection.
  • Multiple Printer Support
    AstroPrint supports multiple printers simultaneously, making it a great choice for users who need to manage more than one 3D printer at a time. This is particularly beneficial for small businesses and educational institutions.
  • Comprehensive Monitoring Features
    AstroPrint offers robust monitoring features, including live streaming and status updates. This ensures that users are always informed about the status of their print jobs and can intervene if necessary.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The platform is compatible with a wide range of devices and operating systems, enabling users to access AstroPrint from desktops, tablets, and smartphones. This versatility enhances user accessibility and convenience.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Free Plan
    While AstroPrint offers a free plan, it comes with limitations such as fewer features and potential usage restrictions. Users looking for extensive capabilities may need to subscribe to a paid plan.
  • Internet Dependency
    As a cloud-based service, AstroPrint requires a reliable internet connection for optimal performance. Connectivity issues could impact the ability to manage or monitor print jobs effectively.
  • Potential Security Concerns
    Storing 3D printing files on the cloud could raise security concerns. Sensitive or proprietary designs may be at risk if adequate precautions and encryption are not implemented.
  • Device Compatibility Limitations
    Although AstroPrint is compatible with many 3D printers, some specific models or proprietary printing systems may not be supported, limiting its usability for certain users.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic functionalities are user-friendly, some of the more advanced features might have a learning curve, particularly for users who are not familiar with certain aspects of 3D printing technology.
  • TypeScript-first design
    imqueue is built with TypeScript at its core, providing strong typing, better IDE support, and compile-time error checking, which helps catch bugs early and improves the developer experience when building microservices.
  • RPC-style messaging abstraction
    It simplifies inter-service communication by abstracting away the complexities of message queue protocols, allowing developers to make calls that feel like local function calls while the underlying complexity of message passing is handled by the framework.
  • Built on RabbitMQ
    By leveraging RabbitMQ as its message broker, imqueue benefits from a mature, battle-tested messaging system with reliable delivery guarantees, clustering support, and a large ecosystem of tools and documentation.
  • Code generation and tooling
    imqueue provides CLI tools and code generation capabilities that can automatically create service clients and boilerplate code, reducing repetitive work and helping maintain consistency across microservices.
  • Microservices-focused architecture
    The framework is specifically designed for building distributed microservices systems, offering features like service discovery and structured communication patterns that address common challenges in distributed system design.

Possible disadvantages

  • Smaller community and ecosystem
    Compared to more mainstream microservices frameworks, imqueue has a relatively small user base and community, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, Stack Overflow answers, and community-contributed plugins or extensions.
  • Limited documentation depth
    While basic documentation exists, some users report that advanced use cases, edge cases, and troubleshooting guides are not as thoroughly documented as more established frameworks, requiring more trial-and-error or direct code inspection.
  • RabbitMQ dependency lock-in
    Being tightly coupled to RabbitMQ means teams must adopt and manage this specific message broker, which could be a limitation for organizations that prefer or already use alternative messaging systems like Kafka, NATS, or AWS SQS.
  • Learning curve for framework-specific patterns
    Developers need to learn imqueue's specific conventions, decorators, and architectural patterns, which adds an additional learning curve on top of understanding TypeScript and general microservices concepts.
  • Potential scalability concerns for very large systems
    As with many queue-based RPC frameworks, extremely high-throughput or very large-scale distributed systems may encounter performance bottlenecks or require significant additional configuration and tuning of the underlying RabbitMQ infrastructure.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

AstroPrint 2 videos + Add
@imqueue 0 videos + Add

Astroprint 3.0 Best 3d Printer Software for Beginners

More videos

  • - The Best Octoprint Plugin! Astroprint!

No @imqueue videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
AstroPrint
@imqueue
100% 100%
3D
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using AstroPrint and @imqueue. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

AstroPrint 4 mentions
@imqueue 0 mentions
  • Sloppy Prints
    Use astroprint.com, I get good prints from the default profile using this. Tweak to your liking. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Ender 3 Z axis hell
    Thats what my dad did and it worked for me, my printer had another 3 days of work before its first print, also to get your prints to stick to the plate (if you have this problem) put some painters tape over the deck and put spray... Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Do I need a pc to 3d print?
    I'd certainly reccomend it since you need to convert the 3d model into gcode that the printer can process, but there are a handful of web based slicers like these: realvisiononline.com astroprint.com grid.space/kiri/. Source: almost 5 years ago

View more

Tracking @imqueue since Jul 2026.

Alternatives to AstroPrint and @imqueue

When comparing AstroPrint and @imqueue, you can also consider the following products.