Based on our record, GitHub Pages should be more popular than Astro Build. It has been mentiond 500 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
My motivation for completing Frontend Mentor's Contact form challenge was to test-drive my field and form packages. I also recently started using and enjoying Astro so I wanted to explore what it would be like to use it as my frontend workshop environment. I even ended up experimenting with Makefiles, Nushell, and Nix flakes within this project. Overall, I learned a lot and gained some new skills. In this post I'm... - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
The data from HTTP Archive and Chrome UX Report cited on astro.build gives us a clear picture. Only 44% of WordPress sites pass Core Web Vitals benchmarks, while Astro (unsurprisingly) leads the pack at 63%. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
I recently remade my website (I know, I know) and I got a surprise when getting to reimplement an rss feed because, while Astro has a module that helps with generating an rss feed, Nuxt doesn't - at least not for V3 and consequently V4. But worry not, for making one is easy enough ! - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
For awareness, if you want to build a SSG/SSR frontend, there's also [Astro](https://astro.build/) It lets you ship client islands to the client, which AFAIK is essentially partial hydration. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Enter Astro. Astro allowed me to build a page from any URL pattern, server-side, include complex js driven divs, but have a 90+ lighthouse score. It still uses tailwindcss it still can use any js modules or functions that the SPA uses. So it was familiar. It did not require a whole re-think. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
But that's not the case. The blog is a simple static generated website using Jekyll, it is built and served through GitHub Pages. With that in mind it makes more sense to use tools and leverage tool calling. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
GitHub Pages is designed to host your personal, organization, or project pages from a GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Do you need a server? If the answer is "Yes" then use Next.js. If the answer is "No", you should use Vite and consider Github Pages or Cloudflare Pages to host your Single Page Application. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Doesn't GitHub already support blogging/blogs out of the box? It also has a Web Editor / IDE (VSCode) built-in. Hit the `.` on any of your GitHub pages/code/files. https://pages.github.com. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Because of the lack of right-to-left (RTL) support I'd probably not use DEV to publish in any of the RTL languages. That is Arabic, Hebrew, and Persian. Instead I'd use one of the Static Site Generators that support RTL and GitHub pages or GitLab pages for free hosting. The only cost is the domain name, if you'd like to have your own. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.
Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket