ast-grep Reviews

GitBook Reviews

ast-grep mentions (24)

• The Self-Driving Codebase: Full Agent Automation with Otter

  The previous post covered how we structured the codebase: Effect conventions, ast-grep enforcement, Drift, and CLAUDE.md to collaborate with Claude Code. You describe what you want, review the output, iterate. That works well. This post is about what happens when you step away entirely: giving the agent a list of issues and letting it work through them while you do something else. In autonomous mode, there's no... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• How we use Effect and ast-grep to make our codebase work better with agents

  We use ast-grep as a structural syntax scanner that operates on the syntax tree of code (using tree-sitter under the hood). You define patterns in a YAML file, and it matches those patterns against the codebase. Critically, it’s run as part of the CI pipeline and configured to exit with an error when a banned pattern is found. And they have to be errors, not warnings. We learned this the hard way. Warnings get... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Less human AI agents, please

  I linked this elsewhere but, the agent could have a skill to use https://ast-grep.github.io/ to perform such mechanical code changes. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Less human AI agents, please

  The proper tool for this is ast-grep (sg) https://ast-grep.github.io/ And an agent can learn to use sg with a skill too. (Or they can use sed) The issue is, at every point you do a replace, you need to verify if it was the right thing to do or if it was a false positive. If you are doing this manually, there's the time to craft the sed or sg query, then for each replacement you need to check it. If there are... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Be intentional about how AI changes your codebase

  We use https://ast-grep.github.io (on a pre-commit hook). Bridges the linter gaps nicely. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

GitBook mentions (6)

• The Ultimate Technical Writing Stack for 2025

  GitBook is simple and clean, and sometimes that’s exactly what you need. I like it for early-stage products or teams with lighter documentation. You’ll eventually hit limits if your structure gets more complex, but if simplicity is your priority, it’s a solid choice. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

• Why GitBook switched from LaunchDarkly to Bucket

  TL,DR: LaunchDarkly is great for B2C companies. Bucket is for B2B SaaS products, like GitBook — a modern, AI-integrated documentation platform. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Bucket vs LaunchDarkly — an alternative for B2B engineers

  Addison Schultz, Developer Relations Lead at GitBook, puts it simply:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Show HN: We built a FOSS documentation CMS with a pretty GUI

  Good question that led to insightful responses. I would like to bring GitBook (https://gitbook.com) too to the comparison notes (no affiliation). They, too, focus on the collaborative, 'similar-to-git-workflow', and versioned approach towards documentation. Happy to see variety in the 'docs' tools area, and really appreciate it being FOSS. Looking forward to trying out Kalmia on some project soon. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• GitLanding: A beautiful landing page for your Github project in a matter of minutes.

  You can have both a landing page (e.g.: www.your-project.dev) and a documentation website (e.g.: docs.your-project.dev). For creating documentation website GitBook is better fit than Gitlanding. GitBook is free for open source Projects (you just need to issue a request). - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago