
GitHub
BitBucket
GitLab
Phabricator
SourceForge
Jira
SourceTree
Integrated, on-demand tools to build software faster, with less stress. Get started for free and find out why over 800,000 users trust Assembla.

PullRequest.com
Refactor.io
Figstack
codebeat
GitLive
Code Review by Codementor
CodeRabbit
CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | assembla.com | codestream.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Assembla yet.
CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on your team, anywhere. Review changes in the context of the full source tree, using your favorite keybindings and environment. Use a simple shortcut to highlight your code and CodeStream will automatically assign a reviewer based on...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Assembla is recommended for software development teams looking for a comprehensive project management platform with strong version control support. It is particularly suited for distributed teams and organizations that require integration with tools like Git, Perforce, and Subversion. It may also be a good fit for teams that need detailed tracking and reporting capabilities.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Development teams who heavily rely on IDEs like Visual Studio Code, IntelliJ, and others. It is particularly useful for remote teams that require robust code review and communication tools to maintain effective collaboration.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Assembla Review
More videos
CodeStream Code Review Inside Your IDE
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Assembla and CodeStream. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Assembla is a younger platform than JIRA but offers a broader range of functionality in its core product like git hosting, code deployment, agile tools, time tracking.
Assembla offers many functions right out-of-the-box that JIRA requires as an add-on, including subversion and git hosting, code deployment, agile tools, time tracking, and social media-style collaboration (message...
After using this with my development team for a few weeks, we grew to love it. Product works amazing for its purpose and really helps developers communicate about our code.
When comparing Assembla and CodeStream, you can also consider the following products.

Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
Compare GitHub to Assembla or CodeStream:


Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Compare BitBucket to Assembla or CodeStream:

Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review
Compare Refactor.io to Assembla or CodeStream:

Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Compare GitLab to Assembla or CodeStream:
