Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Aserto VS CodeStream

Compare Aserto VS CodeStream and see what are their differences

Aserto logo Aserto

Fine-grained, scalable authorization in minutes

CodeStream logo CodeStream

CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE
  • Aserto Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-07

Aserto helps you build secure applications. It makes it easy to add fine-grained, policy-based, real-time access control to your applications and APIs.โ€จ

Aserto handles all the heavy lifting required to achieve secure, scalable, high-performance access management. It offers blazing-fast authorization of a local library coupled with a centralized control plane for managing policies, user attributes, resource and relationship data, and decision logs. And it comes with everything you need to implement RBAC, ABAC, and ReBACm or any other authorization model.

Take a look at our open-source projects: - Topaz.sh: a standalone authorizer you can deploy in your environment to add fine-grained access control to your applications. Topaz lets you combine OPA policies with Zanzibarโ€™s data model for complete flexibility. - OpenPolicyContainers.com (OPCR) secures OPA policies across the lifecycle by adding the ability to tag, version, sign, and test these policies.

  • CodeStream Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-15

CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on your team, anywhere. Review changes in the context of the full source tree, using your favorite keybindings and environment. Use a simple shortcut to highlight your code and CodeStream will automatically assign a reviewer based on context and history. Comment and code review threads are automatically repositioned as your code changes, even across branches.

Aserto features and specs

  • Graph directory
    Built in graph-based directory
  • OPA decision engine
    Support for OPA policies
  • ReBAC
    Supports relationship based access control
  • ABAC
    Supports attribute-based access control
  • RBAC
    Support role-based access control
  • PBAM
    Supports policy-based access management

CodeStream features and specs

  • Integration with IDEs
    CodeStream integrates seamlessly with popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code, JetBrains, and others, making it easy for developers to use it within their existing workflow.
  • In-Context Collaboration
    Allows developers to comment and discuss code directly within the IDE, fostering better communication without having to leave the development environment.
  • Code Annotations
    Provides the ability to annotate code, making it easier to give feedback, suggest improvements, and highlight important sections.
  • Integration with Issue Trackers
    Supports integration with popular issue trackers like Jira, Trello, and GitHub Issues, enabling seamless issue management.
  • Code Review Support
    Facilitates code reviews directly within the IDE, simplifying the review process and ensuring that feedback is received and addressed promptly.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    Offers real-time collaboration features, allowing multiple developers to work on the same codebase simultaneously.
  • Ease of Use
    User-friendly interface that makes it easy for both new and experienced developers to adopt and use effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CodeStream

  • Performance Overhead
    The additional features and integration can sometimes lead to performance overhead, potentially making the IDE slower.
  • Learning Curve
    Though user-friendly, some features may still require a learning curve, particularly for developers who are new to in-IDE collaboration tools.
  • Limited to Specific IDEs
    While it integrates with popular IDEs, it does not support all development environments, which may be a limitation for some teams.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Services
    Heavily dependent on third-party services like GitHub, Jira, etc., which might cause issues if those services experience downtime or connectivity issues.
  • Subscription Costs
    Depending on the features needed, some functionalities may require a subscription, adding to the overall cost for software development teams.
  • Security Concerns
    Integrating with various external tools and services might raise security concerns, especially for projects with stringent security requirements.

Analysis of CodeStream

Overall verdict

  • CodeStream is generally regarded as a beneficial tool for teams looking to enhance their code review processes and internal collaboration. It is well-suited for teams that want to integrate code discussions into their existing workflows seamlessly.

Why this product is good

  • CodeStream is a tool designed to streamline communication and code review processes within development teams. It integrates with popular IDEs and collaboration tools, making it easier for developers to share insights and feedback without leaving their coding environment. This can improve productivity, reduce context-switching, and enhance code quality through more effective reviews and discussions.

Recommended for

    Development teams who heavily rely on IDEs like Visual Studio Code, IntelliJ, and others. It is particularly useful for remote teams that require robust code review and communication tools to maintain effective collaboration.

Aserto videos

Intro to modern authorization

CodeStream videos

CodeStream Code Review Inside Your IDE

More videos:

  • Review - CodeStream
  • Review - CodeStream introduces in-IDE Code Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Aserto and CodeStream)
Developer Tools
41 41%
59% 59
Security
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100
APIs
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Aserto and CodeStream. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Aserto and CodeStream

Aserto Reviews

We have no reviews of Aserto yet.
Be the first one to post

CodeStream Reviews

  1. Great Product

    After using this with my development team for a few weeks, we grew to love it. Product works amazing for its purpose and really helps developers communicate about our code.

    Pros:    Well designed|Works perfectly

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Aserto and CodeStream, you can also consider the following products

authzed - The platform to store, compute, and validate app permissions

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

Cerbos - Cerbos helps teams separate their authorization process from their core application code, making their authorization system more scalable, more secure and easier to change as the application evolves.

Figstack - Your intelligent coding companion

Warrant - Authorization and access control infrastructure for developers

PullRequest.com - Code review as a service