Arq VS Ember-cli

• Encryption
  Arq offers strong encryption, ensuring that your data is secure both in transit and at rest.
• Flexibility
  Supports multiple cloud storage providers, including Amazon S3, Google Drive, Dropbox, and others, allowing users to choose their preferred storage solution.
• Versioning
  Keeps multiple versions of files, allowing users to restore previous versions of their documents if necessary.
• Compression
  Offers data compression features to save storage space and reduce backup times.
• Cross-Platform
  Available for both Mac and Windows, making it accessible for a wide range of users.
• User-Friendly Interface
  The interface is intuitive and easy to navigate, making it suitable for both novice and experienced users.
• Incremental Backups
  Performs incremental backups, which only upload changes made since the last backup, thereby saving time and bandwidth.
• Continuous Backups
  Can be configured to run backups continuously, ensuring that data is always up-to-date.

Possible disadvantages

• Cost
  While the software itself is not free, especially when compared to other freemium solutions, it requires a one-time purchase.
• Initial Setup Complexity
  The initial setup can be complicated for users who are not tech-savvy, especially when configuring cloud storage integrations.
• No Native Mobile Apps
  Arq does not have native mobile apps, limiting access to only desktop operating systems like Windows and macOS.
• Dependence on External Cloud Services
  Relies on third-party cloud services, meaning that any issues or downtimes with those services can affect backup reliability.
• Limited Support
  The customer support options are somewhat limited when compared to larger backup service providers, potentially leading to longer resolution times for issues.
• Resource Intensive
  Can be resource-intensive, consuming considerable CPU and memory during backup operations, which may affect system performance on older machines.

• Convention over Configuration
  Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
• Built-in Tooling
  Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
• Addon Ecosystem
  Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
• Blueprints and Generators
  Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
• Stable Long-term Support
  Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
• Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
  Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
• Build Performance
  For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
• Rigid Structure
  The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
• Migration Complexity
  Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

Movie Review - Netflix's ARQ

More videos

No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Ask HN: What macOS apps/programs do you use daily and recommend?

  * Homebrew - Package manager (kinda like apt/rpm on Linux). * Secretive - Stores SSH keys in the secure enclave [https://github.com/maxgoedjen/secretive] * Hazel - File automations [https://www.noodlesoft.com/] * Arq - Excellent backup... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• Cryptomator Volume can't be accessed by Arq Backup

  I use Arq 7 on macOS to backup to various network, cloud and physical drives. This is able to mount network volumes both as backup sources and destinations, in addition to connected physical drives (internal or external). Source: over 3 years ago

• Best cloud storage option for macOS in 2023

  Wasabi.com is an Amazon S3-alike that I use with the arqbackup.com client for remotely backing up my machines. Wasabi offers a nice desktop client for what looks like Dropbox-like capability. Haven't dug into that yet either. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

• Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!

  The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago