
Raindrop.io
wallabag
Archive.org
Wayback Machine
HTTrack
Pinboard
Instapaper
The open-source, self-hosted internet archiving solution

FlyingPress
WP-Optimize
WP Fastest Cache
Cachify
Autoptimize
Hyper Cache
Cache Enabler
A very fast caching system for WordPress that produces static HTML files.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ArchiveBox should be more popular than WP Super Cache. It has been mentioned 95 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | archivebox.io | wordpress.org |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | 2017 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


ArchiveBox is a powerful, self-hosted internet archiving solution to collect, save, and view sites you want to preserve offline. You can set it up as a command-line tool, web app, and desktop app (alpha), on Linux, macOS, and Windows. You can feed it URLs one at a time, or schedule regular...
No description of WP Super Cache yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
ArchiveBox is recommended for digital archivists, researchers, journalists, and any individuals or organizations that need to reliably save and organize web content. It is particularly suitable for those with the technical expertise to manage a self-hosted setup and who require an offline, permanent record of online information.
No analysis of WP Super Cache yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Archiving the Internet Before it All Rots Away (talk by by ArchiveBox founder)
More videos
WP Super Cache Can Speed Up Your Site - Top WordPress Cache Plugins
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ArchiveBox and WP Super Cache.
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox aims to enable more of the internet to be saved from deterioration by empowering people to self-host their own archives. The intent is for all the web content you care about to be viewable with common software in 50 - 100 years without needing to run ArchiveBox or other specialized software to replay it.
Vast treasure troves of knowledge are lost every day on the internet to link rot. As a society, we have an imperative to preserve some important parts of that treasure, just like we preserve our books, paintings, and music in physical libraries long after the originals go out of print or fade into obscurity.
Whether it's to resist censorship by saving articles before they get taken down or edited, or just to save a collection of early 2010's flash games you love to play, having the tools to archive internet content enables to you save the stuff you care most about before it disappears.
Image from WTF is Link Rot?... The balance between the permanence and ephemeral nature of content on the internet is part of what makes it beautiful. I don't think everything should be preserved in an automated fashion--making all content permanent and never removable, but I do think people should be able to decide for themselves and effectively archive specific content that they care about.
Because modern websites are complicated and often rely on dynamic content, ArchiveBox archives the sites in several different formats beyond what public archiving services like Archive.org/Archive.is save. Using multiple methods and the market-dominant browser to execute JS ensures we can save even the most complex, finicky websites in at least a few high-quality, long-term data formats.
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox differentiates itself from similar self-hosted projects by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.
ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.
If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out ArchiveWeb.page and ReplayWeb.page.
If you want more bookmark categorization and note-taking features, check out Archivy, Memex, Polar, or LinkAce.
If you need more advanced recursive spider/crawling ability beyond --depth=1, check out Browsertrix, Photon, or Scrapy and pipe the outputted URLs into ArchiveBox.
ArchiveBox's answer
Share your experience with using ArchiveBox and WP Super Cache. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Are you aware of ArchiveBox? https://archivebox.io/ What does Hister do differently? Search seems like a major differentiator, I'm wondering if leveraging the existing archivebox project for archival and implementing good search on top... - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago
I’m trying https://archivebox.io/ on my own hardware, along with non-censored dns of course. It works okay but it’s too early for me to give some strong opinions. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
A bit off topic, but are there any self hosted open source archiving servers people are using for personal usage? I think ArchiveBox[1] is the most popular. I will give it a shot, but it's a shame they don't support URL rewriting[2],... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
I haven’t used Wordpress for a few years. But with WP Super Cache (1) we also always did pretty much that: On saving a post/page the static HTML would be written to a cache directory and be the default content served to visitors. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
For most servers I use WP Super Cache. Install and enable it. After that go into the Advanced settings and enable some of the other Recommended settings under Miscellaneous. Always click the "Delete Cache" button and test your page... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
WP Super Cache: A simple and easy-to-use plugin that provides page caching and gzip compression. Source: over 3 years ago
When comparing ArchiveBox and WP Super Cache, you can also consider the following products.

All your articles, photos, video & content from web & apps in one place.
Compare Raindrop.io to ArchiveBox or WP Super Cache:

FlyingPress is a lightweight and easy to use speed optimization plugin for WordPress.
Compare FlyingPress to ArchiveBox or WP Super Cache:


All-in-one WordPress plugin that does database cleaning, image compression, and site caching.
Compare WP-Optimize to ArchiveBox or WP Super Cache:

Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library offering free universal access to books, movies...
Compare Archive.org to ArchiveBox or WP Super Cache:
The fastest and easiest wordpress cache plugin.
Compare WP Fastest Cache to ArchiveBox or WP Super Cache: