ArchiveBox VS TriggerDeck.io

ArchiveBox's answer

• Django
• SQLite
• Wget
• Chromium
• Youtube-dl / yt-dlp
• singlefile
• readability
• mercury
• git
• ripgrep
• sonic

TriggerDeck.io's answer:

TriggerDeck is built primarily with Swift 6, SwiftUI, Swift Charts, URLSession with async/await, SwiftData, and Keychain on iOS.

ArchiveBox's answer

• Monadical.com
• United Nations
• many more... https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/wiki/Web-Archiving-Community

TriggerDeck.io's answer:

TriggerDeck does not publicly disclose customer names at this stage.

ArchiveBox's answer

ArchiveBox aims to enable more of the internet to be saved from deterioration by empowering people to self-host their own archives. The intent is for all the web content you care about to be viewable with common software in 50 - 100 years without needing to run ArchiveBox or other specialized software to replay it.

Vast treasure troves of knowledge are lost every day on the internet to link rot. As a society, we have an imperative to preserve some important parts of that treasure, just like we preserve our books, paintings, and music in physical libraries long after the originals go out of print or fade into obscurity.

Whether it's to resist censorship by saving articles before they get taken down or edited, or just to save a collection of early 2010's flash games you love to play, having the tools to archive internet content enables to you save the stuff you care most about before it disappears.

Image from WTF is Link Rot?... The balance between the permanence and ephemeral nature of content on the internet is part of what makes it beautiful. I don't think everything should be preserved in an automated fashion--making all content permanent and never removable, but I do think people should be able to decide for themselves and effectively archive specific content that they care about.

Because modern websites are complicated and often rely on dynamic content, ArchiveBox archives the sites in several different formats beyond what public archiving services like Archive.org/Archive.is save. Using multiple methods and the market-dominant browser to execute JS ensures we can save even the most complex, finicky websites in at least a few high-quality, long-term data formats.

TriggerDeck.io's answer:

TriggerDeck was created to solve a specific gap in the Zabbix ecosystem: mobile access often becomes less trustworthy when it depends on a hosted proxy or external credential sharing. The product started from the idea that teams should be able to check monitoring data securely from an iPhone and get instant push delivery.

ArchiveBox's answer

ArchiveBox differentiates itself from similar self-hosted projects by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.

ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.

If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out ArchiveWeb.page and ReplayWeb.page.

If you want more bookmark categorization and note-taking features, check out Archivy, Memex, Polar, or LinkAce.

If you need more advanced recursive spider/crawling ability beyond --depth=1, check out Browsertrix, Photon, or Scrapy and pipe the outputted URLs into ArchiveBox.

TriggerDeck.io's answer:

Teams should choose TriggerDeck when they want a mobile-first Zabbix experience without giving a third-party backend access to their monitoring credentials. It is designed for fast triage on iPhone, supports multiple servers, and focuses on the workflows operators actually need on the go: active problems, details, hosts, items, charts, dashboards, and optional push notifications. The product is opinionated about security, clear data boundaries, and reducing friction between alert and action.

ArchiveBox's answer

• journalists
• lawyers
• librarians
• digital preservation specialists
• researchers
• students
• homelab / self-hosting community

TriggerDeck.io's answer:

TriggerDeck is built for teams that run their own Zabbix-based monitoring environments. The primary audience includes IT operations teams, sysadmins, SREs, DevOps and platform engineers, NOC operators, and technical leads who need secure mobile visibility into infrastructure and incident state while away from their desks.

TriggerDeck.io's answer:

TriggerDeck is built around a strict trust model for Zabbix environments: the iPhone app connects directly to the customer’s Zabbix API. Using our integration service its able to deliver Push notifications from Zabbix directly to your iPhone. This gives teams secure mobile access to problems, hosts, items, charts, and dashboards without introducing a hosted read