Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

ArchiveBox VS SubmitMap

Compare ArchiveBox VS SubmitMap and see what are their differences

ArchiveBox

The open-source, self-hosted internet archiving solution

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Free
Alternatives Is it good?
SubmitMap

A free directory of launch platforms plus a phased route of guides: where to submit, in what order, and exactly how.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
happySEO
Create ai humanized SEO content tailored for ecommerce and small businesses with HappySEO tools. From ai writer to keyword research and analyze tools. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ArchiveBox seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 95 times since March 2021.

social mentions
95 vs 0
Bookmark Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
162 vs 6

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

ArchiveBox
SubmitMap
Website archivebox.io submitmap.com
Pricing
Open source Free
Official pricing
Platforms
Linux Mac OSX Docker
—
Company 2017 —
Listed in
Bookmark Manager Bookmarks Utilities Internet Archiving Digital Preservation Backups +3
Startups SEO Tools Link Building Launch Management Software Directory Software Directory Submission AI +4

About ArchiveBox and SubmitMap

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

ArchiveBox
SubmitMap

ArchiveBox is a powerful, self-hosted internet archiving solution to collect, save, and view sites you want to preserve offline. You can set it up as a command-line tool, web app, and desktop app (alpha), on Linux, macOS, and Windows. You can feed it URLs one at a time, or schedule regular...

Read more about ArchiveBox

No description of SubmitMap yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

ArchiveBox 8 features
SubmitMap 5 features
  • Offline website saving
  • Tagging
  • Scheduled archiving
  • Recursive crawling
  • Media extraction
  • Article text extraction
  • Static HTML exports
  • Full-text search
  • Possible time savings
    I can't verify what SubmitMap offers. If it works as a submission or directory-listing tool, as the name suggests, it could save time by letting you submit a site or project to many places from one spot instead of doing it manually.
  • Potential visibility boost
    Services in this category usually aim to increase exposure, backlinks, and discovery. If the listings are real, they could bring some referral traffic and help with early-stage awareness.
  • Centralized workflow
    A single place to manage submissions or listings can make it easier to track where your project has been submitted and avoid duplicates.
  • Useful for early-stage launches
    Founders and indie makers with little marketing budget might find a tool like this a cheap way to get their first listings and initial exposure.
  • Simple concept
    The name implies a narrow, focused purpose, which typically means a short learning curve and less setup than a full marketing suite.

Possible disadvantages

  • Unverified features and claims
    I have no reliable information about SubmitMap's features, pricing, or track record. Check the site directly and read independent reviews before committing time or money.
  • Uncertain SEO value
    Many directory and submission services give low-quality or nofollow links that bring little ranking benefit. Mass submissions can sometimes look spammy to search engines.
  • Limited traffic quality
    Visitors from directory-style listings are often casual browsers rather than engaged users, so conversion rates may be low.
  • Possible cost versus return
    If the service is paid or has premium tiers, the return on investment may be unclear compared with content marketing, social media, or targeted outreach.
  • Limited reputation and support information
    A newer or lesser-known platform may have few public reviews, community feedback, or documented support channels, which makes it harder to judge reliability.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

ArchiveBox
SubmitMap

Overall verdict

  • ArchiveBox is a versatile and robust solution for individuals or organizations seeking to preserve web content. It provides a wide range of archiving options and allows for extensive customization. However, as a self-hosted tool, it requires some technical knowledge to set up and maintain, which may not be ideal for non-technical users. Overall, it is a good tool if you have the technical capability and need to consistently archive online assets.

Why this product is good

  • ArchiveBox is an open-source self-hosted tool designed to help users save and manage web content offline. It is appreciated for its ability to archive web content including static HTML, PDFs, and media files in a format that is easy to navigate and long-lasting, even if the source website becomes inaccessible. The tool supports multiple input methods, including browser integrations, and is capable of running on various platforms, thus offering flexibility and scalability for personal and professional use.

Recommended for

    ArchiveBox is recommended for digital archivists, researchers, journalists, and any individuals or organizations that need to reliably save and organize web content. It is particularly suitable for those with the technical expertise to manage a self-hosted setup and who require an offline, permanent record of online information.

No analysis of SubmitMap yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

ArchiveBox 2 videos + Add
SubmitMap 0 videos + Add

Archiving the Internet Before it All Rots Away (talk by by ArchiveBox founder)

More videos

  • - Installing ArchiveBox On Ubuntu 20.04 Using A Hyper-V VM To Preserve OSINT Investigation Findings

No SubmitMap videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
ArchiveBox
SubmitMap
100% 100%
Bookmark Manager
0% 0%
0% 0%
Software Directory
100% 100%
100% 100%
Bookmarks
0% 0%
0% 0%
Startups
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing ArchiveBox and SubmitMap.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

  • Django
  • SQLite
  • Wget
  • Chromium
  • Youtube-dl / yt-dlp
  • singlefile
  • readability
  • mercury
  • git
  • ripgrep
  • sonic

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

What's the story behind your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

ArchiveBox aims to enable more of the internet to be saved from deterioration by empowering people to self-host their own archives. The intent is for all the web content you care about to be viewable with common software in 50 - 100 years without needing to run ArchiveBox or other specialized software to replay it.

Vast treasure troves of knowledge are lost every day on the internet to link rot. As a society, we have an imperative to preserve some important parts of that treasure, just like we preserve our books, paintings, and music in physical libraries long after the originals go out of print or fade into obscurity.

Whether it's to resist censorship by saving articles before they get taken down or edited, or just to save a collection of early 2010's flash games you love to play, having the tools to archive internet content enables to you save the stuff you care most about before it disappears.

Image from WTF is Link Rot?... The balance between the permanence and ephemeral nature of content on the internet is part of what makes it beautiful. I don't think everything should be preserved in an automated fashion--making all content permanent and never removable, but I do think people should be able to decide for themselves and effectively archive specific content that they care about.

Because modern websites are complicated and often rely on dynamic content, ArchiveBox archives the sites in several different formats beyond what public archiving services like Archive.org/Archive.is save. Using multiple methods and the market-dominant browser to execute JS ensures we can save even the most complex, finicky websites in at least a few high-quality, long-term data formats.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

ArchiveBox's answer

ArchiveBox differentiates itself from similar self-hosted projects by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.

ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.

If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out ArchiveWeb.page and ReplayWeb.page.

If you want more bookmark categorization and note-taking features, check out Archivy, Memex, Polar, or LinkAce.

If you need more advanced recursive spider/crawling ability beyond --depth=1, check out Browsertrix, Photon, or Scrapy and pipe the outputted URLs into ArchiveBox.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

  • journalists
  • lawyers
  • librarians
  • digital preservation specialists
  • researchers
  • students
  • homelab / self-hosting community

User comments

Share your experience with using ArchiveBox and SubmitMap. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

ArchiveBox 95 mentions
SubmitMap 0 mentions
  • hister
    Are you aware of ArchiveBox? https://archivebox.io/ What does Hister do differently? Search seems like a major differentiator, I'm wondering if leveraging the existing archivebox project for archival and implementing good search on top... - Source: Hacker News / 26 days ago
  • Ask HN: Any Alternatives to Archive.ph & co?
    I’m trying https://archivebox.io/ on my own hardware, along with non-censored dns of course. It works okay but it’s too early for me to give some strong opinions. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Wikipedia bans Archive.today after site executed DDoS and altered web captures
    A bit off topic, but are there any self hosted open source archiving servers people are using for personal usage? I think ArchiveBox[1] is the most popular. I will give it a shot, but it's a shame they don't support URL rewriting[2],... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

View more

Tracking SubmitMap since Aug 2026.

Alternatives to ArchiveBox and SubmitMap

When comparing ArchiveBox and SubmitMap, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...