Raindrop.io
wallabag
Archive.org
Wayback Machine
Pinboard
Instapaper
HTTrack
The open-source, self-hosted internet archiving solution
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Snapdrop should be more popular than ArchiveBox. It has been mentioned 232 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
 |
 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | archivebox.io | snapdrop.net |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | 2017 | Startup from Germany |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.
ArchiveBox is a powerful, self-hosted internet archiving solution to collect, save, and view sites you want to preserve offline. You can set it up as a command-line tool, web app, and desktop app (alpha), on Linux, macOS, and Windows. You can feed it URLs one at a time, or schedule regular...
No description of Snapdrop yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
ArchiveBox is recommended for digital archivists, researchers, journalists, and any individuals or organizations that need to reliably save and organize web content. It is particularly suitable for those with the technical expertise to manage a self-hosted setup and who require an offline, permanent record of online information.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Archiving the Internet Before it All Rots Away (talk by by ArchiveBox founder)
More videos
Snapdrop finally let’s IOS & Android users work together seamlessly.
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.
As answered by people managing ArchiveBox and Snapdrop.
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox aims to enable more of the internet to be saved from deterioration by empowering people to self-host their own archives. The intent is for all the web content you care about to be viewable with common software in 50 - 100 years without needing to run ArchiveBox or other specialized software to replay it.
Vast treasure troves of knowledge are lost every day on the internet to link rot. As a society, we have an imperative to preserve some important parts of that treasure, just like we preserve our books, paintings, and music in physical libraries long after the originals go out of print or fade into obscurity.
Whether it's to resist censorship by saving articles before they get taken down or edited, or just to save a collection of early 2010's flash games you love to play, having the tools to archive internet content enables to you save the stuff you care most about before it disappears.
Image from WTF is Link Rot?... The balance between the permanence and ephemeral nature of content on the internet is part of what makes it beautiful. I don't think everything should be preserved in an automated fashion--making all content permanent and never removable, but I do think people should be able to decide for themselves and effectively archive specific content that they care about.
Because modern websites are complicated and often rely on dynamic content, ArchiveBox archives the sites in several different formats beyond what public archiving services like Archive.org/Archive.is save. Using multiple methods and the market-dominant browser to execute JS ensures we can save even the most complex, finicky websites in at least a few high-quality, long-term data formats.
ArchiveBox's answer
ArchiveBox differentiates itself from similar self-hosted projects by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.
ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.
If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out ArchiveWeb.page and ReplayWeb.page.
If you want more bookmark categorization and note-taking features, check out Archivy, Memex, Polar, or LinkAce.
If you need more advanced recursive spider/crawling ability beyond --depth=1, check out Browsertrix, Photon, or Scrapy and pipe the outputted URLs into ArchiveBox.
ArchiveBox's answer
Share your experience with using ArchiveBox and Snapdrop. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.
We have no reviews of ArchiveBox yet. Be the first one to post
Takes forever to send even small video files with high speed internet. Horrible documentation for transferring instructions. No option in the app menu to choose a destination folder. There's no way to compress all of...
SnapDrop does an excellent job in sharing multiple files to another computer. Just zip/compress a folder with multiple files and select that zipped folder to send to the other computer or mobile device.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
Are you aware of ArchiveBox? https://archivebox.io/ What does Hister do differently? Search seems like a major differentiator, I'm wondering if leveraging the existing archivebox project for archival and implementing good search on top... - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago
I’m trying https://archivebox.io/ on my own hardware, along with non-censored dns of course. It works okay but it’s too early for me to give some strong opinions. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
A bit off topic, but are there any self hosted open source archiving servers people are using for personal usage? I think ArchiveBox[1] is the most popular. I will give it a shot, but it's a shame they don't support URL rewriting[2],... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Snapdrop Snapdrop is mainly a browser-based service rather than a native mobile app, though some unofficial wrappers exist. It requires a modern web browser and uses WebRTC for peer-to-peer file transfers. Because it runs in a browser,... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
If the constraint is that you don't want to install any software, there are a bunch of these web based AirDrop clones, besides the ones mentioned here are two more: https://pairdrop.net/ https://snapdrop.net/ I've tried PairDrop, it... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
I love Snapdrop [0] for that use case, since it doesn't require downloading/installing an app. [0] https://snapdrop.net/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
When comparing ArchiveBox and Snapdrop, you can also consider the following products.
All your articles, photos, video & content from web & apps in one place.
Compare Raindrop.io to ArchiveBox or Snapdrop:
WeTransfer is a free service to send big or small files from A to B.
Compare WeTransfer to ArchiveBox or Snapdrop:
Wormhole lets you share files with end-to-end encryption and a link that automatically expires.
Compare Wormhole.app to ArchiveBox or Snapdrop:
Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library offering free universal access to books, movies...
Compare Archive.org to ArchiveBox or Snapdrop:
HTML5 clone of Apple's AirDrop - easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC
Compare ShareDrop to ArchiveBox or Snapdrop:
