ArchiveBox VS PermitCore.dev

ArchiveBox's answer

• Django
• SQLite
• Wget
• Chromium
• Youtube-dl / yt-dlp
• singlefile
• readability
• mercury
• git
• ripgrep
• sonic

PermitCore.dev's answer:

PermitCore is built on .NET 10. The backend uses ASP.NET Core, Entity Framework Core, and PostgreSQL, while the administration panel and public website use Blazor WebAssembly. Valkey handles caching and distributed coordination, and the platform is deployed with Docker and Nginx. Stripe powers subscription and Store payment automation. For licensing security, PermitCore uses established cryptographic primitives including AES-256-GCM for browser-side encryption, HMAC-SHA256 for validation, and Argon2/PBKDF2 where appropriate for key derivation and credential protection. Client SDKs are available for .NET, Node.js, Python, Java, C++, and PHP.

ArchiveBox's answer

• Monadical.com
• United Nations
• many more... https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/wiki/Web-Archiving-Community

PermitCore.dev's answer:

PermitCore is an early-stage startup, and we do not publish customer names without their explicit permission. Our current users include indie developers, SaaS founders, agencies, and software vendors using PermitCore to create licenses, integrate licensing into their products, and sell licenses through their own built-in Store.

ArchiveBox's answer

ArchiveBox aims to enable more of the internet to be saved from deterioration by empowering people to self-host their own archives. The intent is for all the web content you care about to be viewable with common software in 50 - 100 years without needing to run ArchiveBox or other specialized software to replay it.

Vast treasure troves of knowledge are lost every day on the internet to link rot. As a society, we have an imperative to preserve some important parts of that treasure, just like we preserve our books, paintings, and music in physical libraries long after the originals go out of print or fade into obscurity.

Whether it's to resist censorship by saving articles before they get taken down or edited, or just to save a collection of early 2010's flash games you love to play, having the tools to archive internet content enables to you save the stuff you care most about before it disappears.

Image from WTF is Link Rot?... The balance between the permanence and ephemeral nature of content on the internet is part of what makes it beautiful. I don't think everything should be preserved in an automated fashion--making all content permanent and never removable, but I do think people should be able to decide for themselves and effectively archive specific content that they care about.

Because modern websites are complicated and often rely on dynamic content, ArchiveBox archives the sites in several different formats beyond what public archiving services like Archive.org/Archive.is save. Using multiple methods and the market-dominant browser to execute JS ensures we can save even the most complex, finicky websites in at least a few high-quality, long-term data formats.

PermitCore.dev's answer:

PermitCore started from a problem we kept running into while building our own software. Adding licensing looked simple at first, but it quickly became another product to maintain: secure key storage, validation APIs, device limits, offline use, subscriptions, customer access, payments, and support all needed their own infrastructure. We built PermitCore so developers could handle that complete journey in one place: create and manage licenses, implement them through an API or SDK, and sell them directly through a built-in Store with no commission taken by PermitCore. What began as an internal solution became a developer platform designed to let other teams focus on the software they actually want to build.

ArchiveBox's answer

ArchiveBox differentiates itself from similar self-hosted projects by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.

ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.

If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out ArchiveWeb.page and ReplayWeb.page.

If you want more bookmark categorization and note-taking features, check out Archivy, Memex, Polar, or LinkAce.

If you need more advanced recursive spider/crawling ability beyond --depth=1, check out Browsertrix, Photon, or Scrapy and pipe the outputted URLs into ArchiveBox.

PermitCore.dev's answer:

Choose PermitCore when you want one platform for the full licensing lifecycle instead of several disconnected tools. You can create and manage licenses, implement licensing through the REST API or SDKs, and sell licenses directly through a built-in Store. PermitCore takes no commission on those software sales. It also covers device management, online and offline use, floating seats, entitlements, subscriptions, customer and reseller portals, and Stripe automation. Browser-side encryption keeps usable license keys out of plaintext storage. PermitCore is EU-hosted, supports Enterprise self-hosting, includes a permanent free plan, and gives every paid plan a three-month free trial.

ArchiveBox's answer

• journalists
• lawyers
• librarians
• digital preservation specialists
• researchers
• students
• homelab / self-hosting community

PermitCore.dev's answer:

PermitCore is primarily for indie developers, SaaS founders, small software teams, agencies, and established software vendors that want one complete path from creating licenses to implementing licensing and selling the finished product. Teams can create and manage licenses, integrate them through the REST API or SDKs, and then sell licenses directly through the built-in PermitCore Store without paying PermitCore a commission on those sales. It supports desktop applications, APIs, developer tools, plugins, and other paid software, with online, offline, floating, subscription, metered, and perpetual licensing. The permanent free plan helps developers get started, while larger teams can grow into reseller management, self-hosting, and custom roles.

PermitCore.dev's answer:

PermitCore gives software teams one complete path from creating licenses to implementing licensing and selling their product. Developers can generate and manage licenses, integrate them through the REST API or SDKs, and sell licenses directly through a built-in Store without paying PermitCore a commission. It also supports online and offline licensing, floating and node-locked licenses, device limits, entitlements, subscriptions, customer and reseller portals, and Stripe automation. Underneath that workflow is a security model where license keys are encrypted in the browser before storage and usable keys are never persisted in plaintext. A permanent free plan is available for indie developers.