Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

ArchiveBox VS Devodrome

Compare ArchiveBox VS Devodrome and see what are their differences

ArchiveBox

The open-source, self-hosted internet archiving solution

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Free
Alternatives Is it good?
Devodrome

Devodrome is the software development arena where our skillful team fights to develop and deliver projects on time, on budget and on scope.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
warmup.rocks
warmup.rocks keeps your CDN cache warm in every edge location worldwide: Cloudflare, Fastly, Akamai, CloudFront and more. Warming from 42 countries, hit-ratio analytics. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ArchiveBox seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 95 times since March 2021.

social mentions
95 vs 0
Bookmark Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
161 vs 4

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

ArchiveBox
Devodrome
Website archivebox.io devodrome.com
Pricing
Open source Free
—
Platforms
Linux Mac OSX Docker
—
Company 2017 —
Listed in
Bookmark Manager Bookmarks Utilities Internet Archiving Digital Preservation Backups +3
Business & Commerce Tech Online Services Web Application Development +1

About ArchiveBox and Devodrome

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

ArchiveBox
Devodrome

ArchiveBox is a powerful, self-hosted internet archiving solution to collect, save, and view sites you want to preserve offline. You can set it up as a command-line tool, web app, and desktop app (alpha), on Linux, macOS, and Windows. You can feed it URLs one at a time, or schedule regular...

Read more about ArchiveBox

No description of Devodrome yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

ArchiveBox 8 features
Devodrome 5 features
  • Offline website saving
  • Tagging
  • Scheduled archiving
  • Recursive crawling
  • Media extraction
  • Article text extraction
  • Static HTML exports
  • Full-text search
  • Developer Project Showcase
    Devodrome provides a dedicated platform for developers to showcase their projects, making it easier to share work with the community and gain visibility for personal or open-source projects.
  • Community Feedback
    The platform allows developers to receive feedback from other community members, which can help improve projects and foster collaboration among developers.
  • Project Discovery
    Devodrome serves as a discovery hub where developers can find interesting projects built by others, providing inspiration and opportunities to learn from different coding approaches.
  • Free to Use
    The platform is accessible without cost, lowering the barrier to entry for developers who want to share their work and connect with other builders.
  • Simple and Focused Interface
    Devodrome offers a straightforward, focused experience centered around developer projects without the noise and distractions found on larger social media platforms.

Possible disadvantages

  • Small Community Size
    As a relatively niche platform, Devodrome has a smaller user base compared to established platforms like GitHub or Product Hunt, which may limit the exposure and feedback developers receive.
  • Limited Features
    The platform may lack advanced features such as detailed analytics, robust collaboration tools, or integrated development workflows that more mature platforms offer.
  • Low Engagement Risk
    With a smaller community, there is a risk that projects posted on the platform may receive little to no engagement, which can be discouraging for developers seeking feedback.
  • Limited Brand Recognition
    Devodrome is not widely known in the broader developer ecosystem, meaning having a presence there may not carry as much weight on a resume or portfolio compared to well-known platforms.
  • Uncertain Long-term Viability
    As a smaller, independent platform, there may be concerns about its long-term sustainability and whether it will continue to be maintained and developed over time.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

ArchiveBox
Devodrome

Overall verdict

  • ArchiveBox is a versatile and robust solution for individuals or organizations seeking to preserve web content. It provides a wide range of archiving options and allows for extensive customization. However, as a self-hosted tool, it requires some technical knowledge to set up and maintain, which may not be ideal for non-technical users. Overall, it is a good tool if you have the technical capability and need to consistently archive online assets.

Why this product is good

  • ArchiveBox is an open-source self-hosted tool designed to help users save and manage web content offline. It is appreciated for its ability to archive web content including static HTML, PDFs, and media files in a format that is easy to navigate and long-lasting, even if the source website becomes inaccessible. The tool supports multiple input methods, including browser integrations, and is capable of running on various platforms, thus offering flexibility and scalability for personal and professional use.

Recommended for

    ArchiveBox is recommended for digital archivists, researchers, journalists, and any individuals or organizations that need to reliably save and organize web content. It is particularly suitable for those with the technical expertise to manage a self-hosted setup and who require an offline, permanent record of online information.

Overall verdict

  • Based on available information, Devodrome appears to be a platform aimed at developers, but there is limited verifiable public information to make a definitive assessment of its quality, reliability, or user satisfaction. Potential users should evaluate it directly against their specific needs before committing.

Why this product is good

  • May offer developer-focused tools or resources that streamline workflows
  • Could provide a specialized platform tailored to specific coding or development needs
  • Potentially useful for learning, collaboration, or project management depending on its feature set

Recommended for

  • Developers exploring new tools or platforms
  • Teams looking for specialized development resources
  • Users willing to trial a service and verify its features against their own requirements before adopting it

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

ArchiveBox 2 videos + Add
Devodrome 0 videos + Add

Archiving the Internet Before it All Rots Away (talk by by ArchiveBox founder)

More videos

  • - Installing ArchiveBox On Ubuntu 20.04 Using A Hyper-V VM To Preserve OSINT Investigation Findings

No Devodrome videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
ArchiveBox
Devodrome
100% 100%
Bookmark Manager
0% 0%
0% 0%
Business & Commerce
100% 100%
100% 100%
Bookmarks
0% 0%
0% 0%
Online Services
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing ArchiveBox and Devodrome.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

  • Django
  • SQLite
  • Wget
  • Chromium
  • Youtube-dl / yt-dlp
  • singlefile
  • readability
  • mercury
  • git
  • ripgrep
  • sonic

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

What's the story behind your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

ArchiveBox aims to enable more of the internet to be saved from deterioration by empowering people to self-host their own archives. The intent is for all the web content you care about to be viewable with common software in 50 - 100 years without needing to run ArchiveBox or other specialized software to replay it.

Vast treasure troves of knowledge are lost every day on the internet to link rot. As a society, we have an imperative to preserve some important parts of that treasure, just like we preserve our books, paintings, and music in physical libraries long after the originals go out of print or fade into obscurity.

Whether it's to resist censorship by saving articles before they get taken down or edited, or just to save a collection of early 2010's flash games you love to play, having the tools to archive internet content enables to you save the stuff you care most about before it disappears.

Image from WTF is Link Rot?... The balance between the permanence and ephemeral nature of content on the internet is part of what makes it beautiful. I don't think everything should be preserved in an automated fashion--making all content permanent and never removable, but I do think people should be able to decide for themselves and effectively archive specific content that they care about.

Because modern websites are complicated and often rely on dynamic content, ArchiveBox archives the sites in several different formats beyond what public archiving services like Archive.org/Archive.is save. Using multiple methods and the market-dominant browser to execute JS ensures we can save even the most complex, finicky websites in at least a few high-quality, long-term data formats.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

ArchiveBox's answer

ArchiveBox differentiates itself from similar self-hosted projects by providing both a comprehensive CLI interface for managing your archive, a Web UI that can be used either independently or together with the CLI, and a simple on-disk data format that can be used without either.

ArchiveBox is neither the highest fidelity nor the simplest tool available for self-hosted archiving, rather it's a jack-of-all-trades that tries to do most things well by default. It can be as simple or advanced as you want, and is designed to do everything out-of-the-box but be tuned to suit your needs.

If you want better fidelity for very complex interactive pages with heavy JS/streams/API requests, check out ArchiveWeb.page and ReplayWeb.page.

If you want more bookmark categorization and note-taking features, check out Archivy, Memex, Polar, or LinkAce.

If you need more advanced recursive spider/crawling ability beyond --depth=1, check out Browsertrix, Photon, or Scrapy and pipe the outputted URLs into ArchiveBox.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

ArchiveBox's answer

  • journalists
  • lawyers
  • librarians
  • digital preservation specialists
  • researchers
  • students
  • homelab / self-hosting community

User comments

Share your experience with using ArchiveBox and Devodrome. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

ArchiveBox 95 mentions
Devodrome 0 mentions
  • hister
    Are you aware of ArchiveBox? https://archivebox.io/ What does Hister do differently? Search seems like a major differentiator, I'm wondering if leveraging the existing archivebox project for archival and implementing good search on top... - Source: Hacker News / 18 days ago
  • Ask HN: Any Alternatives to Archive.ph & co?
    I’m trying https://archivebox.io/ on my own hardware, along with non-censored dns of course. It works okay but it’s too early for me to give some strong opinions. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Wikipedia bans Archive.today after site executed DDoS and altered web captures
    A bit off topic, but are there any self hosted open source archiving servers people are using for personal usage? I think ArchiveBox[1] is the most popular. I will give it a shot, but it's a shame they don't support URL rewriting[2],... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

View more

Tracking Devodrome since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to ArchiveBox and Devodrome

When comparing ArchiveBox and Devodrome, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...