ArangoDB Reviews

GitHub MCP Server Reviews

ArangoDB mentions (6)

• MongoDB takes a swing at PostgreSQL after claiming wins against rival

  If you like the document db idea there are a lot of choices, especially https://arangodb.com/ which I think gets little attention because people who use it see it as a secret weapon. Too bad about the license though. Also https://couchdb.apache.org/ and https://developer.marklogic.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Which Database is Perfect for You? A Comprehensive Guide to MySQL, PostgreSQL, NoSQL, and More

  ArangoDB is a multi-model database that supports document, key-value, and graph data models with a unified query language. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• Demonstrating ArangoDB VelocyPack: A High-Performance Binary Data Format

  In modern databases, efficient data serialization and deserialization are paramount to achieving high performance. ArangoDB, a multi-model database, addresses this need with its innovative binary data format, VelocyPack. This article delves into the intricacies of VelocyPack, demonstrating its advantages, usage, and how it enhances the performance of ArangoDB with code examples in Java and Rust. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• How to choose the right type of database

  ArangoDB: A native multi-model database, it offers flexibility for documents, graphs, and key-values. This versatility makes it suitable for applications requiring a combination of these data models. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• Spidergram is a collection of tools my company Autogram has built or enabled over the past several years to support our work to automate content inventories for large websites: it's part web crawler, part domain model, and part mad science. We released the first public beta today.

  ArangoDB, a "multi-modal" database engine that stores arbitrary JSON documents like MongoDB, key/value data like Redis, and graph relationships like Neo4j — and lets you leverage all three kinds of data in a single query. Source: over 3 years ago

GitHub MCP Server mentions (18)

• Do unused MCP tools cost you money?

  I have a small "GitHub summarizer" agent: one system prompt, one job — answer questions about my GitHub account by calling the GitHub MCP server. I duplicated its configuration (MAVERIK supports this directly — same model, same prompt, same everything) and changed one field on the copy: the set of attached MCP servers, adding deepwiki, microsoft-learn, and context7. Neither agent needs any of those three for the... - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago

• Every API Will Be Rebuilt for Agents

  GitHub's official MCP server is excellent — and GitHub is narrowing its default toolset and consolidating PR tools into fewer, more capable ones, explicitly to cut tool bloat and improve agent reasoning. The implication is hard to miss: even one of the best API companies on the planet is learning that a 1:1 mapping from product API to agent tools isn't the right shape. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Your AI Agent Has Push Access to Every Repo

  The official GitHub MCP server registers 83 tools. Most people set it up for reading code and managing issues. What they don't realise is they've also handed their agent the keys to:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Helping Claude Do Its Best Work

  A lot of people use MCP servers to connect Claude to tools. I'm not generally a fan. MCP servers load a lot of information into context and often don't do everything that the API can. Last I looked, even the official Github MCP Server is guilty of this. I'd rather write tools directly, to my specifications. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

• Kiro showcase: Automating Changes Across Several Repos with Spec-Driven Development and Custom Sub-Agents

  Rather than manually searching through repositories, I used Kiro with the GitHub MCP server to:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago