
Akto
Metlo API Security
Pynt.io
Discover your API surface and test authorization, OWASP API Top 10, and business-logic risks before production. Start free with no credit card.

SonarQube
CodeClimate
CodeFactor.io
ESLint
Coveralls
SensioLabs Insight
codebeat
Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Codacy seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 4 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | apyguard.com | codacy.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from Turkey · 1 - 9 employees | Startup from Portugal · 1 - 9 employees · 2012 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


ApyGuard is a developer-first API security testing platform that finds vulnerabilities and authorization flaws before they reach production. Most teams don't have an accurate picture of the APIs their applications actually expose. OpenAPI files go stale, and AI coding assistants (Copilot, Cursor,...
Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity....
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
ApyGuard - API Discovery Chrome Extension
Using Codacy for automated code reviews
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ApyGuard and Codacy.
ApyGuard's answer
ApyGuard starts from source code, not traffic. Most API security platforms watch production traffic to discover APIs — which means they can only see endpoints that are already deployed and receiving requests. ApyGuard discovers endpoints directly from the codebase, generates OpenAPI documentation from what it finds, and tests for OWASP API Top 10 issues — especially authorization flaws like BOLA and BFLA — before the code ships. It also comes with APIScout, a free VS Code extension (also on Open VSX for Cursor and Windsurf) that runs endpoint discovery entirely locally, so no code ever leaves the developer's machine. And unlike most of the category, pricing is public and self-serve, starting at $129/month.
ApyGuard's answer
It depends on your situation, honestly. If you're an enterprise with a security operations team and a six-figure budget, traffic-based platforms are mature options. ApyGuard is built for the teams those platforms don't serve: startups and SMBs that ship APIs every week without a dedicated AppSec department. Compared to spec-first tools, ApyGuard doesn't require you to already have an OpenAPI file — it generates one from your code. Compared to traffic-based tools, it tests pre-production instead of after exposure. Compared to per-endpoint enterprise pricing, it starts at $129/month with a seven-day trial, no credit card and no sales call. You can find out what your API actually exposes the same day you sign up.
ApyGuard's answer
Backend developers, DevSecOps engineers, and engineering leaders at startups and small-to-mid-sized technology companies — typically SaaS, fintech, e-commerce, and healthcare teams. A fast-growing part of our audience is teams building with AI assistants like Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code, who need to know exactly which endpoints their AI-assisted codebase actually exposes.
ApyGuard's answer
The recurring problem: teams almost never had an accurate picture of the APIs their applications exposed. OpenAPI files went stale, undocumented endpoints shipped every sprint, and the tools that could help were priced and designed for large enterprises. AI coding assistants made the gap worse - code ships faster than anyone documents or reviews it. ApyGuard was built to close that gap from the source code side: discover what's really there, document it automatically, and test it before production - at a price a startup can actually pay.
ApyGuard's answer
Python (static analysis and scanning engine) TypeScript (web application and VS Code extension)
Share your experience with using ApyGuard and Codacy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of ApyGuard yet. Be the first one to post
Each of these tools offers unique advantages that make them compelling alternatives to SonarQube, depending on organizational goals, budgets, and technology stacks. Codeant.ai and Codacy provide user-friendly...
Codacy is a popular code analysis and quality tool that helps you deliver better software. It continuously reviews your code and monitors its quality from the beginning.
Secondly, while SonarQube offers security analysis, Codacy provides a more holistic approach to security, including features like supply chain security and secret detection out of the box. Added to this are Codacy’s...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking ApyGuard since Aug 2026.
I'm trying to use Codacy to review my code. One of the issues is regarding the use of the "setcookie" function. Source: almost 5 years ago
Does anyone have an example on how to get this conversion done on github actions where I can convert the *.coverage file into a *.xml file for uploading to codacy.com. Source: about 5 years ago
Online analysisFinally, if you want a simple way to analyze your code without having to manually configure everything locally, you can use an online code review service such as Codacy (shameless plug here). We already integrate some of... - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
When comparing ApyGuard and Codacy, you can also consider the following products.

Akto is an Instant, Open Source API Security product. Discover all your APIs and find vulnerabilities by running 100+built-in tests. Write custom tests and automate in Akto.
Compare Akto to ApyGuard or Codacy:

SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Compare SonarQube to ApyGuard or Codacy:

Open Source API Security Platform
Compare Metlo API Security to ApyGuard or Codacy:

Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.
Compare CodeClimate to ApyGuard or Codacy:

Pynt offers dynamic API security testing for developers and testers to identify and fix vulnerabilities during the development lifecycle.
Compare Pynt.io to ApyGuard or Codacy:

Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket
Compare CodeFactor.io to ApyGuard or Codacy: