Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Appscend VS Packer

Compare Appscend VS Packer and see what are their differences

ScreenshotMAX
The all-in-one Screenshot API for developers: capture websites, generate PDFs, record videos, and automate it all with powerful, scalable infrastructure. No browser setup, no hassle. Just clean results, fast. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Appscend logo Appscend

Appscend provides turnkey mobile solutions that drive TV audience engagement, Salesforce performance, The on-demand economy and Mobile video monetization

Packer logo Packer

Packer is an open-source software for creating identical machine images from a single source configuration.
  • Appscend Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-11-09
  • Packer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

Appscend features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Development
    Appscend allows developers to create apps that work across multiple platforms, reducing the time and cost associated with building separate apps for iOS and Android.
  • Cloud-Based Services
    Provides cloud storage and other cloud services that facilitate scalable app development, which is particularly useful for managing data and ensuring quick access to app resources.
  • Integrated Analytics
    Offers in-depth analytics tools to track user engagement and app performance, enabling developers to make data-driven decisions and optimize their apps effectively.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Appscend features a user-friendly interface that simplifies the app development process, making it accessible for users who might not have extensive technical expertise.

Possible disadvantages of Appscend

  • Limited Customization
    Some users report that the customization options are not as extensive as they would like, potentially limiting advanced developers who want more control over their app's functionality.
  • Performance Challenges
    Depending on the complexity of the app, there might be performance issues compared to apps developed natively, which could affect user experience.
  • Learning Curve
    While it is designed to be user-friendly, there is still a learning curve associated with mastering the platform, especially for complete newcomers to app development.
  • Dependency on Platform Continuity
    Relying on a third-party platform, such as Appscend, introduces a risk if the platform ceases operation or doesn't update its features regularly in line with technology advancements.

Packer features and specs

  • Multi-Provider Support
    Packer supports a wide variety of providers such as AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, VMware, and more. This allows for flexibility and the ability to create machine images across different environments.
  • Automation
    Packer automates the creation of machine images, eliminating the need for manual image configuration and reducing the potential for human error.
  • Script Reusability
    Packer allows for the reuse of scripts and configuration files, enabling a consistent and repeatable process for image creation.
  • Parallel Builds
    Packer can build multiple images in parallel, which can significantly speed up the provisioning process.
  • Idempotency
    Packer ensures that the output machine image is always an identical result given the same input configuration, reducing the risk of inconsistencies.

Possible disadvantages of Packer

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The variety of features and flexibility that Packer offers can make it complex and challenging to learn, especially for beginners.
  • Limited Debugging Tools
    Packer's debugging tools are not as mature or as integrated as those found in some other DevOps tools, making troubleshooting more difficult.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Complex configurations with multiple builders and provisioners can become hard to manage and maintain, leading to potential errors.
  • No State Management
    Unlike Terraform, Packer does not manage state, which means users need to handle state management separately if required.
  • Dependency on External Tools
    Packer often relies on external scripts and tools for provisioning, which can introduce additional dependencies and complexities.

Analysis of Packer

Overall verdict

  • Packer is a valuable tool for organizations looking to streamline their image building process and maintain consistency across different environments. Its flexibility and wide range of features make it a strong asset in infrastructure automation and DevOps pipelines.

Why this product is good

  • Packer is considered a good tool because it automates the creation of machine images for multiple platforms from a single source configuration. This efficiency reduces errors and speeds up the deployment process. Packer is highly versatile and integrates well with various configuration management tools, broadening its applicability across different environments. It also supports multiple cloud providers, making it a great choice for multi-cloud strategies.

Recommended for

  • DevOps teams
  • Cloud infrastructure engineers
  • Organizations using multi-cloud strategies
  • Teams seeking automated and consistent image building processes
  • Developers looking to integrate infrastructure as code practices

Appscend videos

+ Add

Appscend Tutorial: First Application using Content Lists

More videos:

  • Review - Developing Smarter Apps with Appscend
  • Review - Building a Event app with Appscend - part one

Packer videos

No Packer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Appscend and Packer)

Appscend

Packer

Developer Tools
14 14%
Developer Tools
86% 86
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100
IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
Continuous Integration And Delivery
0 0%
Continuous Integration And Delivery
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Appscend and Packer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Appscend and Packer

Appscend Reviews

We have no reviews of Appscend yet.
Be the first one to post

Packer Reviews

Introduction to Top Open Source Virtualization Tools
Packer is notably light, high performing, and operates on every major operating system. It assembles and configures all the necessary components for a virtual machine then creates images that run on multiple platforms. Packer doesn’t replace configuration management tools like Puppet or Chef; as a matter of fact, when creating images, Packer can utilize tools like Puppet or...
Source: www.getfilecloud.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Packer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Appscend mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Appscend yet. Tracking of Appscend recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Packer mentions (9)

  • Failed to connect to the host via SSH on Ubuntu 22.04
    If you have just upgraded to Ubuntu 22.04, and you suddenly experience either errors when trying to ssh into hosts, or when running ansible or again when running the ansible provisioner building a packer image, this is probably going to be useful for you. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Create a minimalist OS using Docker Containers and Hashicorp Packer
    I am already using Hashicorp Packer at work and for personal projects and I wanted to test This idea out by wrapping it a single Packer Template file. This reduces the level of maintaining a lot of small scripts, Dockerfiles and configurations and the user can simply trigger a couple of Commands to get a minimalist OS at the end of the process. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • After self-hosting my email for twenty-three years I have thrown in the towel. The oligopoly has won.
    And while it is a slight increase in complexity, it can be an overall net gain in functionality, configurability and reliability. Much like Packer is far more reliable and practical than manually making VM images sitting in front of a terminal, even though making the initial configuration takes some time. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Customized Ubuntu Images using Packer + QEMU + Cloud-Init & UEFI bootloading
    Hashicorp Packer provides a nice wrapper / abstraction over the QEMU in order to boot the image and use it to set it up on first-boot. Instead of writing really long commands in order to boot up the image using QEMU, Packer provided a nice Configuration Template in a more Readable fashion. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • The journey of sharing a wired USB printer over the network
    Packer seemed like the perfect tool for the job. I have never used it before and wanted to get familiar with the tool. It doesn't come with ARM support out of the box, but there are two community projects to fill that niche. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Appscend and Packer, you can also consider the following products

B4X - Cross platform development tools for native iOS, Android, desktop and server applications.

Terraform - Tool for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure safely and efficiently.

SimPholders - A small utility for fast access to your iPhone simulator apps.

Puppet Enterprise - Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.

MobAppCreator - MobAppCreator is a self-service mobile application platform.

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service

Loading...