Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Traffic Server VS ExaProxy

Compare Apache Traffic Server VS ExaProxy and see what are their differences

Apache Traffic Server logo Apache Traffic Server

Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.

ExaProxy logo ExaProxy

ExaProxy is a a high-performance non-caching proxy.
  • Apache Traffic Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • ExaProxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-02

Apache Traffic Server features and specs

  • High Performance
    Apache Traffic Server is designed for high-speed caching and can handle large volumes of traffic efficiently. Its architecture allows it to serve requests with low latency, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications.
  • Scalability
    It offers robust scalability features, allowing it to manage multiple terabytes of data and scale up to handle many clients simultaneously, which is beneficial for growing businesses and expanding infrastructure.
  • Extensibility
    Traffic Server supports plugins and extensions, enabling developers to customize and extend its functionality to suit specific needs, which adds flexibility for unique requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Traffic Server offers a free solution with a strong community support, allowing users to collaborate and contribute to its development and troubleshoot issues.
  • SSL Termination
    It provides the capability to handle SSL termination, which offloads the burden from backend servers, improving overall security and performance for HTTPS traffic.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Traffic Server

  • Complex Configuration
    The configuration of Apache Traffic Server can be complex, especially for beginners, which might require a steep learning curve and extensive documentation reading or seeking community help.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Traffic Server is primarily developed for Unix-based systems and has limited support for Windows, which can be a limitation for organizations that primarily operate in a Windows environment.
  • Community Support
    While it benefits from open-source community support, it may not have the same level of professional support or comprehensive documentation as some commercial alternatives, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Resource Intensive
    When handling large amounts of traffic, Apache Traffic Server can become resource-intensive, which may necessitate higher hardware investments to maintain optimal performance.

ExaProxy features and specs

  • Lightweight
    ExaProxy is designed to be lightweight, making it suitable for environments with limited resources where a full-featured proxy might be too demanding.
  • High Performance
    ExaProxy is capable of handling a large number of concurrent connections efficiently, offering high performance for demanding tasks.
  • Flexible Configuration
    ExaProxy provides flexibility in configuration, allowing users to tailor proxy settings to meet specific requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, ExaProxy allows users to inspect, modify, and enhance the code to fit their needs, offering transparency and community-driven support.
  • Python-based
    ExaProxy is written in Python, which makes it accessible to a wide range of developers familiar with the language and allows easy integration with other Python-based systems.

Possible disadvantages of ExaProxy

  • Limited Features
    Compared to some other proxies, ExaProxy might lack certain advanced features that are needed in more complex environments.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around ExaProxy, it may not be as large or active as those of more established proxy solutions, potentially resulting in slower support and fewer resources.
  • Scalability Concerns
    In extreme high-load scenarios, ExaProxy may not scale as effectively as specialized, high-end commercial proxy servers designed for such tasks.
  • Learning Curve
    For users unfamiliar with Python or who lack experience with proxy server configurations, there might be a learning curve associated with deploying and managing ExaProxy.

Apache Traffic Server videos

Transparent HTTP proxying with Apache Traffic Server

More videos:

  • Review - Yahoo's Adventure with Apache Traffic Server - Shu Kit Chan, Vijay Prashanth Hosahithlu

ExaProxy videos

No ExaProxy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Traffic Server and ExaProxy)
Proxy Server
65 65%
35% 35
Proxy
79 79%
21% 21
VPN
0 0%
100% 100
Tool
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Traffic Server and ExaProxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Traffic Server seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Traffic Server mentions (6)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Traffic Server โ€” A free, fast, and scalable HTTP caching system that improves network efficiency. It supports forward and reverse proxy caching and is configurable to run simultaneously on either or both options. It also provides authentication and basic authorization through plugins. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Wikipedia now has up to 1000X reduction of ATS disk read latency at the p999
    Apache Traffic Server: https://trafficserver.apache.org/ Hereโ€™s how they use it along with Varnish: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Caching_overview. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • How does Content delivery/distribution network work?
    The LARGE majority of CDNs use either Apache Traffic Server (https://trafficserver.apache.org/) or Nginx for their cache webserver, so the mechanisms used are pretty easy to find if you look through the docs. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Using Nginx as an Object Storage Gateway
    Apache Traffic Server (no relation to Apache itself) would be an excellent option: https://trafficserver.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • Build a CDN in about 5 hours
    We have choices. We could use Varnish (scripting! Edge side includes! PHK blog posts!). We could use Apache Traffic Server (being the only new team this year to use ATS!). Or we could use NGINX (we're already running it!). The only certainty is that you'll come to hate whichever one you pick. Try them all and pick the one you hate the least. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
View more

ExaProxy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ExaProxy yet. Tracking of ExaProxy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Traffic Server and ExaProxy, you can also consider the following products

Squid Proxy - Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.

Polipo - A small and fast caching web proxy (a web cache, an HTTP proxy, a proxy server).

WinGate - WinGate is highly capable web proxy software for Windows: caching, intercepting, forward and reverse proxy with https inspection and SSL offload, SOCKS server, email

Artica Proxy - Artica Proxy is an appliance that claim to manage Squid-cache proxy with all features that Squid...

Varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator

Privoxy - Privoxy helps users to protect their privacy.