Apache Struts VS cppq

• Robust Framework
  Apache Struts is a mature and well-established framework for Java web applications, providing stable and reliable tools for enterprise-level applications.
• MVC Architecture
  Struts adheres to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern, which separates business logic, presentation, and navigation, making code maintenance and development easier.
• Extensive Documentation
  Struts has comprehensive documentation and a wealth of online resources, including tutorials, community forums, and user guides, which can support developers throughout their projects.
• Rich Tag Library
  It comes with a rich set of custom tags that enhance the JSP (JavaServer Pages) to create dynamic web content easily.
• Plugin Support
  Apache Struts supports various plugins that can extend its functionality, allowing developers to integrate additional features without much effort.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  New developers might find Struts challenging to learn due to its complexity and the need for a good understanding of the MVC architecture and Java web application development.
• Configuration Overhead
  The framework requires extensive XML configuration, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming compared to convention-over-configuration frameworks.
• Performance
  Struts can be slower than some newer, lighter frameworks due to its broader feature set and the overhead associated with its extensive configuration.
• Security Vulnerabilities
  Struts has had notable security vulnerabilities in the past. Although patches and updates are available, it necessitates proactive monitoring and maintenance.
• Outdated Compared to Modern Frameworks
  With the advent of modern frameworks like Spring MVC and JavaServer Faces, some developers consider Struts to be less up-to-date with the latest web development standards and practices.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

Finding and Fixing Apache Struts CVE-2017-5638 with Black Duck Hub

More videos

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• 17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
  raygun.com · Nov 2022

  You can integrate Struts with other Java frameworks to perform tasks that aren’t built into the platform. For instance, you can use the Spring plugin for dependency injection or the Hibernate plugin for...

• 10 Best Java Frameworks You Should Know
  www.simplilearn.com · Feb 2022

  Followed by Struts Framework, the next leading framework currently being used in the IT industry is the Wicket.

We have no reviews of cppq yet. Be the first one to post

• 1 an experienta intr-un domeniu irelevant, now what?

  The Apache Struts website (https://struts.apache.org/) offers tutorials and other resources for learning about the Apache Struts framework. Source: almost 4 years ago

• Most Popular Web Application Frameworks

  3) Struts 2 - Also a popular java based framework. Backed by the Apache Foundation and built to easily integrate with Spring. This is the easiest choice when converting from a Struts 1 framework to a more modern and secure framework. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.