Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Struts VS CodeceptJS

Compare Apache Struts VS CodeceptJS and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache Struts logo Apache Struts

Apache Struts is an open-source web application framework for developing Java EE web applications.

CodeceptJS logo CodeceptJS

SuperCharged End 2 End Testing with WebDriver & Puppeteer
  • Apache Struts Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-27
  • CodeceptJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

Apache Struts features and specs

  • Robust Framework
    Apache Struts is a mature and well-established framework for Java web applications, providing stable and reliable tools for enterprise-level applications.
  • MVC Architecture
    Struts adheres to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern, which separates business logic, presentation, and navigation, making code maintenance and development easier.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Struts has comprehensive documentation and a wealth of online resources, including tutorials, community forums, and user guides, which can support developers throughout their projects.
  • Rich Tag Library
    It comes with a rich set of custom tags that enhance the JSP (JavaServer Pages) to create dynamic web content easily.
  • Plugin Support
    Apache Struts supports various plugins that can extend its functionality, allowing developers to integrate additional features without much effort.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Struts

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New developers might find Struts challenging to learn due to its complexity and the need for a good understanding of the MVC architecture and Java web application development.
  • Configuration Overhead
    The framework requires extensive XML configuration, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming compared to convention-over-configuration frameworks.
  • Performance
    Struts can be slower than some newer, lighter frameworks due to its broader feature set and the overhead associated with its extensive configuration.
  • Security Vulnerabilities
    Struts has had notable security vulnerabilities in the past. Although patches and updates are available, it necessitates proactive monitoring and maintenance.
  • Outdated Compared to Modern Frameworks
    With the advent of modern frameworks like Spring MVC and JavaServer Faces, some developers consider Struts to be less up-to-date with the latest web development standards and practices.

CodeceptJS features and specs

  • Unified Testing Framework
    CodeceptJS uses the BDD-style syntax to write tests, which makes it easier to read and write. It supports multiple backend drivers such as WebDriver, Protractor, Puppeteer, and Playwright, allowing flexibility in test automation.
  • Interactive Debugging
    It offers an interactive debugging mode, where you can pause tests and interact with the application in a browser, making it easier to diagnose and fix issues.
  • Scenario-based Testing
    Provides a scenario-based testing approach that is easy to understand and helps create more structured and organized test cases.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    CodeceptJS has a variety of plugins available that can extend its capabilities, such as allure reports, UI-based test execution, and advanced interface configurations.
  • Automatic Waiting
    With its built-in automatic waiting system, testers don't need to write explicit waits or sleeps, reducing flakiness in test scripts.

Possible disadvantages of CodeceptJS

  • Learning Curve
    While CodeceptJS simplifies many aspects of testing, it requires initial learning and adaptation for those not familiar with its scenario-driven testing approach or JavaScript.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up CodeceptJS with the different supported drivers can be complex, especially for beginners or those who are not familiar with JavaScript-based test automation.
  • Community and Support
    Although gaining popularity, the community size is relatively smaller compared to some other testing frameworks, which may lead to limited resources or solutions when facing complex issues.
  • Performance Overhead
    The abstraction layers that CodeceptJS provides, while useful, can sometimes lead to performance overhead compared to writing raw scripts with lower-level libraries directly.

Analysis of Apache Struts

Overall verdict

  • Apache Struts is a robust framework, suitable for building Java-based web applications, but it's crucial to stay vigilant regarding security updates.

Why this product is good

  • Apache Struts is known for its MVC framework, which is useful for creating well-structured and maintainable Java applications. It provides a range of comprehensive features like a flexible tag library, integration with other Java frameworks, and a strong support community. However, it has faced some high-profile security vulnerabilities in the past, underscoring the importance of keeping the framework timely updated.

Recommended for

  • Organizations developing enterprise-level Java applications
  • Developers familiar with Java and looking for a robust MVC framework
  • Teams interested in integrating their web applications with other Java technologies

Apache Struts videos

Finding and Fixing Apache Struts CVE-2017-5638 with Black Duck Hub

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Struts 2 - remote command execution
  • Review - Dark ambient drone music | Vulnerable Apache Struts installation under attack (Java, Jakarta)

CodeceptJS videos

Testing with NightwatchJS, Introduction to CodeceptJS, CodeceptJS + Playright and Cypress journey

More videos:

  • Review - Video #10 For a better tests Management with CodeceptJS & Docker
  • Review - CodeceptUI - bringing Cypress like experience to CodeceptJS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Struts and CodeceptJS)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Web Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Struts and CodeceptJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Struts and CodeceptJS

Apache Struts Reviews

17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
You can integrate Struts with other Java frameworks to perform tasks that aren’t built into the platform. For instance, you can use the Spring plugin for dependency injection or the Hibernate plugin for object-relational mapping. Struts also allows you to use different client-side technologies such as Jakarta Server Pages to build the frontend of your application.
Source: raygun.com
10 Best Java Frameworks You Should Know
Followed by Struts Framework, the next leading framework currently being used in the IT industry is the Wicket.

CodeceptJS Reviews

We have no reviews of CodeceptJS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CodeceptJS should be more popular than Apache Struts. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Struts mentions (2)

CodeceptJS mentions (10)

  • Automation Framework Design
    But honestly, it may be preferable for you to use a single framework that does support both technologies (Web and Mobile) out of the box like webdriver.io or codecept. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Comparing Full Page Screenshots, Cross-Device
    There are different tools for visual screenshot testing, like BackstopJS, and Cypress.io also has a screenshot() function. In this series, I focus on writing tests with CodeceptJS. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • How to Accelerate Selenide Tests with Playwright
    CodeceptJS – A wrapper for different tools in one interface. Language: JavaScript/TypeScript. Frameworks that are wrapped: Playwright, Webdriver.io, Puppeteer, Protractor, etc. The service also comes with a large community and is easy to install and use for e2e testing. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Cypress vs WebDriverIO vs Selenium, and more — The ULTIMATE comparison among testing frameworks
    I'm saddened codeceptJS wasn't even mentioned. It's easily better than most of the ones listed except Cypress. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Testing React Apps in 2022 with Cypress: An In-Depth Guide for Beginners
    Back when I was doing FE, I found https://codecept.io, which is the same concept as Cypress but with a Playwright driver. Have not used but thought it's worth a mention. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Struts and CodeceptJS, you can also consider the following products

Spring Framework - The Spring Framework provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

Grails - An Open Source, full stack, web application framework for the JVM

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Spark Mail - Spark helps you take your inbox under control. Instantly see what’s important and quickly clean up the rest. Spark for Teams allows you to create, discuss, and share email with your colleagues

Playwright - Playwright is automation software for Chromium, Firefox, Webkit using the Node.js library having a single API in place.