Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Ignite VS Alternative PHP Cache

Compare Apache Ignite VS Alternative PHP Cache and see what are their differences

Apache Ignite logo Apache Ignite

high-performance, integrated and distributed in-memory platform for computing and transacting on...

Alternative PHP Cache logo Alternative PHP Cache

The APC (Alternative PHP Cache) is an Open Source opcode cache extension to the PHP programming...
  • Apache Ignite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-08
  • Alternative PHP Cache Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-25

Apache Ignite features and specs

  • In-Memory Data Grid
    Apache Ignite provides a robust in-memory data grid that can drastically improve data access speeds by storing data in memory across distributed nodes.
  • Scalability
    The system is designed to scale horizontally, allowing users to add more nodes to handle increased loads, thereby ensuring high availability and performance.
  • Distributed Compute Capabilities
    Ignite supports parallel execution of tasks across cluster nodes, which is beneficial for complex computations and real-time processing.
  • Persistence
    Although primarily in-memory, Ignite offers a durable and transactional Persistence layer that ensures data can be persisted on disk, providing a hybrid in-memory and persistent storage solution.
  • SQL Queries
    Ignite offers support for ANSI-99 SQL, which allows users to execute complex SQL queries across distributed datasets easily.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with existing Hadoop and Spark setups, allowing users to enhance their existing data pipelines with Ignite’s capabilities.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Apache Ignite includes built-in mechanisms for recovery and ensures that data copies are maintained across nodes for resilience against node failures.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Ignite

  • Complexity
    Apache Ignite can be complex to set up and manage, especially when configuring a large, distributed system with multiple nodes.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running an in-memory data grid like Ignite requires significant memory resources, which can increase operational costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive features and distributed nature, there is a steep learning curve associated with effectively utilizing Ignite.
  • Configuration Overhead
    There is substantial configuration overhead involved to optimize performance and ensure proper cluster management.
  • Community Support
    Although it has active development, the community support might not be as robust compared to other more mature solutions, possibly leading to challenges in finding solutions to niche issues.
  • YARN Dependence
    For those looking to integrate with Hadoop, Ignite's optimal performance is sometimes reliant on Hadoop YARN, which can introduce additional complexity.

Alternative PHP Cache features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Apache Ignite videos

Best Practices for a Microservices Architecture on Apache Ignite

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Ignite + GridGain powering up banks and financial institutions with distributed systems

Alternative PHP Cache videos

No Alternative PHP Cache videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Ignite and Alternative PHP Cache)
Databases
81 81%
19% 19
NoSQL Databases
79 79%
21% 21
Key-Value Database
71 71%
29% 29
Relational Databases
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Ignite and Alternative PHP Cache. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Ignite seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Ignite mentions (3)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Ignite — Free and open-source, Apache Ignite is a horizontally scalable key-value cache store system with a robust multi-model database that powers APIs to compute distributed data. Ignite provides a security system that can authenticate users' credentials on the server. It can also be used for system workload acceleration, real-time data processing, analytics, and as a graph-centric programming model. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Ask HN: P2P Databases?
    Ignite works as you describe: https://ignite.apache.org/ I wouldn't really recommend this approach, I would think more in terms of subscriptions and topics and less of a 'database'. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • .NET and Apache Ignite: Testing Cache and SQL API features — Part I
    Last days, I started using Apache Ignite as a cache strategy for some applications. Apache Ignite is an open-source In-Memory Data Grid, distributed database, caching, and high-performance computing platform. Source: over 3 years ago

Alternative PHP Cache mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Alternative PHP Cache yet. Tracking of Alternative PHP Cache recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Ignite and Alternative PHP Cache, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

eAccelerator - eAccelerator is a free open-source PHP accelerator & optimizer.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

memcached - High-performance, distributed memory object caching system

Hazelcast - Clustering and highly scalable data distribution platform for Java

Varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator