Software Alternatives & Reviews

Apache HttpComponents VS Babel

Compare Apache HttpComponents VS Babel and see what are their differences

Apache HttpComponents logo Apache HttpComponents

Apache HttpComponents is responsible for creating and maintaining a toolset of low level Java components focused on HTTP and other protocols

Babel logo Babel

Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.
  • Apache HttpComponents Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-20
  • Babel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-02

Apache HttpComponents videos

No Apache HttpComponents videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Babel videos

Babel - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Day 16 | Babel Review | 365 Films
  • Review - Worth The Hype? - BABEL Review
  • Review - Book CommuniTEA: Is BABEL a rac1st mani!fest0? [you should know the answer]
  • Review - Babel is a Masterpiece, And Here's Why

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache HttpComponents and Babel)
Development Tools
14 14%
86% 86
Javascript UI Libraries
15 15%
85% 85
Libraries And Widgets
21 21%
79% 79
UI
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache HttpComponents and Babel. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Babel seems to be a lot more popular than Apache HttpComponents. While we know about 134 links to Babel, we've tracked only 4 mentions of Apache HttpComponents. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache HttpComponents mentions (4)

  • Does Apache or some other CLIENT JAVA implementation support HTTP/2?
    I'm looking for java client that can connect to a HTTP/2 based server.. The server is already supporting HTTP/2 API. I don't see the most popular Apache Http client https://hc.apache.org/ still supporting HTTP/2. Source: about 1 year ago
  • java problem using selenuim
    You need the Apache HttpClient library: https://hc.apache.org/. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Question with API
    Here is an apache library to make these easier. Https://hc.apache.org/. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Request Bodies in Get Requests
    I’ve to build a cli HTTP client in Java and went with OkHttp [1], as it was widely used on Android. I’ve to add support for GET requests with a body but I wasn’t able to do it with OkHttp. The library was rather opinionated and you couldn’t add a body to a request body back then [2]. I was rather surprised, because I thought HTTP specs allowed it, while discouraging; so an HTTP library should allow this kind of... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

Babel mentions (134)

  • How, and why, you should add JavaScript linting to your project. With ESLint and Gulp
    Some of the most popular JavaScript linting tools are ESLint, JSHint, JSLint and JSCS. We're going to be using ESLint. It’s very flexible, easy to use and has the best ES6 support, which will be helpful if we introduce more modern JavaScript (that will be transpiled for older browsers using https://babeljs.io/). All rules for ESLint can be found here: https://eslint.org/docs/rules/. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • What is Server Side Rendering (SSR) and Static Site Generation (SSG)?
    This simply extends the existing build process that many front-end frameworks have. After Babel's done with its transpilation, it merely executes code to compile your initial screen into static HTML and CSS. This isn't entirely dissimilar from how SSR hydrates your initial screen, but it's done at compile-time, not at request time. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Storybook 8 Beta
    First, we switched the default compiler for new projects from Babel to SWC (Speedy Web Compiler). SWC is dramatically faster than Babel and requires zero configuration. We’ll continue to support Babel in any project currently using it. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Nuxt vs Next: Which JavaScript Framework Suits Your Next Project?
    Nuxt.js is an open-source JavaScript framework built on Vue.js, Node.js, Vite, and Babel.js used for creating fast, cutting-edge applications. Nuxt.js possesses similar features to Next.js, with the major difference being the web framework it is compatible with. Next.js is a React framework whereas Nuxt.js is a Vue framework. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Abstract Syntax Trees and Practical Applications in JavaScript
    Disclaimer: If you've already developed Babel or ESLint plugins, this article may not be as beneficial for you, as you're likely already familiar with the majority of the content covered here. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache HttpComponents and Babel, you can also consider the following products

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Modernizr - Modernizr is a JavaScript library which is designed to detect HTML5 and CSS3 features in various browsers.

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Composer - Composer is a tool for dependency management in PHP.

OpenSSL - OpenSSL is a free and open source software cryptography library that implements both the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, which are primarily used to provide secure communications between web browsers and …

Raven.js - Raven.js is a standalone JavaScript client for Sentry.