Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Apache Cassandra VS Google Cloud SQL

Compare Apache Cassandra VS Google Cloud SQL and see what are their differences

Hive
Seamless project management and collaboration for your team. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Apache Cassandra logo Apache Cassandra

The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.

Google Cloud SQL logo Google Cloud SQL

Google Cloud SQL is a fully-managed database service that makes it easy to set-up, maintain, manage and administer your MySQL database.
  • Apache Cassandra Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17
  • Google Cloud SQL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18

Apache Cassandra features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache Cassandra is designed for linear scalability and can handle large volumes of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure.
  • High Availability
    Cassandra ensures high availability by replicating data across multiple nodes. Even if some nodes fail, the system remains operational.
  • Performance
    It provides fast writes and reads by using a peer-to-peer architecture, making it highly suitable for applications requiring quick data access.
  • Flexible Data Model
    Cassandra supports a flexible schema, allowing users to add new columns to a table at any time, making it adaptable for various use cases.
  • Geographical Distribution
    Data can be distributed across multiple data centers, ensuring low-latency access for geographically distributed users.
  • No Single Point of Failure
    Its decentralized nature ensures there is no single point of failure, which enhances resilience and fault-tolerance.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Cassandra

  • Complexity
    Managing and configuring Cassandra can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and skills for optimal performance.
  • Eventual Consistency
    Cassandra follows an eventual consistency model, meaning that there might be a delay before all nodes have the latest data, which may not be suitable for all use cases.
  • Write-heavy Operations
    Although Cassandra handles writes efficiently, write-heavy workloads can lead to compaction issues and increased read latency.
  • Limited Query Capabilities
    Cassandra's query capabilities are relatively limited compared to traditional RDBMS, lacking support for complex joins and aggregations.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Regular maintenance tasks such as node repair and compaction are necessary to ensure optimal performance, adding to the administrative overhead.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    While the ecosystem for Cassandra is growing, it is still not as extensive or mature as those for some other database technologies.

Google Cloud SQL features and specs

  • Fully Managed Service
    Google Cloud SQL handles maintenance, backups, and updates, allowing developers to focus on application development rather than database management tasks.
  • Scalability
    Easily scale vertically by upgrading to more powerful machine types or horizontally to handle increased workload without manual intervention.
  • High Availability
    Google Cloud SQL offers automatic failover, replication, and backup, ensuring minimal downtime and data preservation in case of failures.
  • Security
    Provides multiple layers of security including encryption at rest and in transit, along with built-in firewall rules and IAM policies for robust access control.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services like BigQuery, Compute Engine, and Google Kubernetes Engine, supporting complex architectures and workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Google Cloud SQL

  • Cost
    It can be more expensive than self-managed solutions, especially as the need for additional resources and scaling arises.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Relying on Google Cloud SQL could create dependency on the Google Cloud ecosystem, which might complicate future migration to other platforms.
  • Customization Limitations
    Being a managed service, it has constraints on certain configurations and customizations that might be essential for specific use cases.
  • Latency
    There might be increased latency compared to on-premises solutions, particularly for applications requiring very low-latency data access.
  • Compliance
    While Google Cloud SQL complies with many regulatory standards, some industries with highly specific requirements may find it unsuitable.

Apache Cassandra videos

+ Add

Course Intro | DS101: Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

Google Cloud SQL videos

+ Add

GCP | Google Cloud SQL | Cloud SQL Features , Read Replicas & High Availability | DEMO

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Cassandra and Google Cloud SQL)

Apache Cassandra

Google Cloud SQL

Databases
87 87%
Databases
13% 13
NoSQL Databases
92 92%
NoSQL Databases
8% 8
Relational Databases
83 83%
Relational Databases
17% 17
Graph Databases
100 100%
Graph Databases
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Cassandra and Google Cloud SQL. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache Cassandra and Google Cloud SQL

Apache Cassandra Reviews

16 Top Big Data Analytics Tools You Should Know About
Application Areas: If you want to work with SQL-like data types on a No-SQL database, Cassandra is a good choice. It is a popular pick in the IoT, fraud detection applications, recommendation engines, product catalogs and playlists, and messaging applications, providing fast real-time insights.
Source: www.analytixlabs.co.in
9 Best MongoDB alternatives in 2019
The Apache Cassandra is an ideal choice for you if you want scalability and high availability without affecting its performance. This MongoDB alternative tool offers support for replicating across multiple datacenters.
Source: www.guru99.com

Google Cloud SQL Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Cloud SQL yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Cassandra should be more popular than Google Cloud SQL. It has been mentiond 44 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Cassandra mentions (44)

  • Why You Shouldn’t Invest In Vector Databases?
    In fact, even in the absence of these commercial databases, users can effortlessly install PostgreSQL and leverage its built-in pgvector functionality for vector search. PostgreSQL stands as the benchmark in the realm of open-source databases, offering comprehensive support across various domains of database management. It excels in transaction processing (e.g., CockroachDB), online analytics (e.g., DuckDB),... - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
  • Data integrity in Ably Pub/Sub
    All messages are persisted durably for two minutes, but Pub/Sub channels can be configured to persist messages for longer periods of time using the persisted messages feature. Persisted messages are additionally written to Cassandra. Multiple copies of the message are stored in a quorum of globally-distributed Cassandra nodes. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Which Database is Perfect for You? A Comprehensive Guide to MySQL, PostgreSQL, NoSQL, and More
    Cassandra is a highly scalable, distributed NoSQL database designed to handle large amounts of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Consistent Hashing: An Overview and Implementation in Golang
    Distributed storage Distributed storage systems like Cassandra, DynamoDB, and Voldemort also use consistent hashing. In these systems, data is partitioned across many servers. Consistent hashing is used to map data to the servers that store the data. When new servers are added or removed, consistent hashing minimizes the amount of data that needs to be remapped to different servers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Understanding SQL vs. NoSQL Databases: A Beginner's Guide
    On the other hand, NoSQL databases are non-relational databases. They store data in flexible, JSON-like documents, key-value pairs, or wide-column stores. Examples include MongoDB, Couchbase, and Cassandra. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Google Cloud SQL mentions (18)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Cassandra and Google Cloud SQL, you can also consider the following products

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

PostgreSQL - PostgreSQL is a powerful, open source object-relational database system.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

MySQL - The world's most popular open source database

ArangoDB - A distributed open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values.

Oracle DBaaS - See how Oracle Database 12c enables businesses to plug into the cloud and power the real-time enterprise.

Loading...