Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Axiom VS Clusterpoint

Compare Apache Axiom VS Clusterpoint and see what are their differences

Apache Axiom logo Apache Axiom

XML Databases

Clusterpoint logo Clusterpoint

XML Databases
  • Apache Axiom Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-11
  • Clusterpoint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06

Apache Axiom features and specs

  • Memory Efficiency
    Apache Axiom uses a pull-based model called deferred building, which helps manage memory usage efficiently. It constructs the XML infoset lazily, meaning that it only parses parts of the document as needed, reducing memory overhead when dealing with large XML files.
  • Streaming API
    Axiom provides a streaming API that allows processing of XML data incrementally as it is being read. This is particularly useful for applications that need to handle large streams of XML data without loading the entire document into memory.
  • Flexibility
    The library supports both DOM and StAX APIs, allowing developers to choose the most suitable API for their use case. This flexibility can help in integrating Axiom into different types of XML processing workflows.
  • SOAP Optimization
    Axiom is designed with SOAP messages in mind and provides built-in support for processing SOAP Envelopes. Its ability to handle and optimize SOAP-related tasks is a significant advantage for applications in the Web Services domain.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Axiom

  • Complexity
    The usage of a deferred building model and various supported APIs can introduce complexity, especially for developers who are unfamiliar with streaming models or who come from a DOM-based background.
  • Limited Documentation
    Some users may find the documentation to be lacking in comprehensive examples and detailed explanations, which can hinder the learning process and effective utilization of the library.
  • Performance Overhead
    While Axiom is efficient with memory usage, there can be performance overhead associated with its deferred processing model, particularly in scenarios where the entire XML content is rapidly accessed or modified.
  • Niche Use Cases
    Axiom is particularly suited for scenarios involving SOAP messages. For general-purpose XML processing, especially in simpler applications, its advanced features may be overkill, making more lightweight libraries more appropriate.

Clusterpoint features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Axiom and Clusterpoint)
Text Editors
52 52%
48% 48
Task Management
42 42%
58% 58
Databases
50 50%
50% 50
NoSQL Databases
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Axiom and Clusterpoint. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Axiom seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Axiom mentions (1)

Clusterpoint mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Clusterpoint yet. Tracking of Clusterpoint recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Axiom and Clusterpoint, you can also consider the following products

MarkLogic - Schema-agnostic Enterprise NoSQL database technology, coupled w/ powerful search & flexible application services

Qizx - XML Databases

Apache Anakia - XML Databases

Apache Xerces - Advanced XML parser, including support for XML Schema, DOM Level 2, and SAX.

BaseX - BaseX is a very light-weight, high-performance and scalable XML Database engine and XPath/XQuery...

Apache Santuario - Apache Santuario - Index