Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Axiom VS Apache Xalan

Compare Apache Axiom VS Apache Xalan and see what are their differences

Apache Axiom logo Apache Axiom

XML Databases

Apache Xalan logo Apache Xalan

XML Databases
  • Apache Axiom Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-11
  • Apache Xalan Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-17

Apache Axiom features and specs

  • Memory Efficiency
    Apache Axiom uses a pull-based model called deferred building, which helps manage memory usage efficiently. It constructs the XML infoset lazily, meaning that it only parses parts of the document as needed, reducing memory overhead when dealing with large XML files.
  • Streaming API
    Axiom provides a streaming API that allows processing of XML data incrementally as it is being read. This is particularly useful for applications that need to handle large streams of XML data without loading the entire document into memory.
  • Flexibility
    The library supports both DOM and StAX APIs, allowing developers to choose the most suitable API for their use case. This flexibility can help in integrating Axiom into different types of XML processing workflows.
  • SOAP Optimization
    Axiom is designed with SOAP messages in mind and provides built-in support for processing SOAP Envelopes. Its ability to handle and optimize SOAP-related tasks is a significant advantage for applications in the Web Services domain.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Axiom

  • Complexity
    The usage of a deferred building model and various supported APIs can introduce complexity, especially for developers who are unfamiliar with streaming models or who come from a DOM-based background.
  • Limited Documentation
    Some users may find the documentation to be lacking in comprehensive examples and detailed explanations, which can hinder the learning process and effective utilization of the library.
  • Performance Overhead
    While Axiom is efficient with memory usage, there can be performance overhead associated with its deferred processing model, particularly in scenarios where the entire XML content is rapidly accessed or modified.
  • Niche Use Cases
    Axiom is particularly suited for scenarios involving SOAP messages. For general-purpose XML processing, especially in simpler applications, its advanced features may be overkill, making more lightweight libraries more appropriate.

Apache Xalan features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache Xalan is an open-source project, which means it is free to use, modify, and distribute. This provides flexibility and reduces costs for enterprises and individual developers.
  • Standards Compliant
    Xalan is compliant with XSLT and XPath standards, ensuring that transformations are performed according to the specifications laid out by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    As a Java-based library, Xalan can run on any platform that supports Java, providing cross-platform flexibility for developers.
  • Mature and Stable
    Xalan has been around for many years, making it a mature and stable choice for XML transformations with a history of updates and community support.
  • Integration
    Xalan integrates well with other Apache projects and Java applications, making it a versatile choice for projects already using other components of the Apache ecosystem.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Xalan

  • Performance
    There are faster XSLT processors available, so Xalan might not be the best choice for applications requiring high-performance transformations.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to some proprietary tools, Xalan might lack certain advanced features or optimizations found in commercial XML processing libraries.
  • Deprecation Concerns
    The pace of updates can be slow, causing concerns about potential deprecation or lack of support for newer technologies in the future.
  • Complexity
    While powerful, Xalan can be complex for new users to learn and implement effectively, particularly those not already familiar with XML and XSLT.
  • Community Support
    Being an open-source project, formal support is limited to community forums and documentation, which might not meet the needs of all users.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Axiom and Apache Xalan)
Text Editors
50 50%
50% 50
Task Management
53 53%
47% 47
Databases
51 51%
49% 49
NoSQL Databases
46 46%
54% 54

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Axiom and Apache Xalan. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Axiom seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Axiom mentions (1)

Apache Xalan mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Xalan yet. Tracking of Apache Xalan recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Axiom and Apache Xalan, you can also consider the following products

MarkLogic - Schema-agnostic Enterprise NoSQL database technology, coupled w/ powerful search & flexible application services

Apache Xerces - Advanced XML parser, including support for XML Schema, DOM Level 2, and SAX.

Apache Santuario - Apache Santuario - Index

Apache Anakia - XML Databases

BaseX - BaseX is a very light-weight, high-performance and scalable XML Database engine and XPath/XQuery...

Qizx - XML Databases