Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Axiom VS Apache Santuario

Compare Apache Axiom VS Apache Santuario and see what are their differences

Apache Axiom logo Apache Axiom

XML Databases

Apache Santuario logo Apache Santuario

Apache Santuario - Index
  • Apache Axiom Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-11
  • Apache Santuario Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-08

Apache Axiom features and specs

  • Memory Efficiency
    Apache Axiom uses a pull-based model called deferred building, which helps manage memory usage efficiently. It constructs the XML infoset lazily, meaning that it only parses parts of the document as needed, reducing memory overhead when dealing with large XML files.
  • Streaming API
    Axiom provides a streaming API that allows processing of XML data incrementally as it is being read. This is particularly useful for applications that need to handle large streams of XML data without loading the entire document into memory.
  • Flexibility
    The library supports both DOM and StAX APIs, allowing developers to choose the most suitable API for their use case. This flexibility can help in integrating Axiom into different types of XML processing workflows.
  • SOAP Optimization
    Axiom is designed with SOAP messages in mind and provides built-in support for processing SOAP Envelopes. Its ability to handle and optimize SOAP-related tasks is a significant advantage for applications in the Web Services domain.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Axiom

  • Complexity
    The usage of a deferred building model and various supported APIs can introduce complexity, especially for developers who are unfamiliar with streaming models or who come from a DOM-based background.
  • Limited Documentation
    Some users may find the documentation to be lacking in comprehensive examples and detailed explanations, which can hinder the learning process and effective utilization of the library.
  • Performance Overhead
    While Axiom is efficient with memory usage, there can be performance overhead associated with its deferred processing model, particularly in scenarios where the entire XML content is rapidly accessed or modified.
  • Niche Use Cases
    Axiom is particularly suited for scenarios involving SOAP messages. For general-purpose XML processing, especially in simpler applications, its advanced features may be overkill, making more lightweight libraries more appropriate.

Apache Santuario features and specs

  • Security
    Apache Santuario provides robust XML signature and encryption capabilities, enhancing the security of XML data transmission and storage.
  • Compatibility
    It adheres to W3C standards for XML encryption and signing, ensuring broad compatibility with other XML processing systems and applications.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project under the Apache Software Foundation, it allows for community-driven development and use without licensing fees.
  • Flexibility
    Supports a wide range of cryptographic algorithms and configurations, allowing developers to tailor its usage according to their specific security needs.
  • Integration
    Can be integrated into existing applications with relative ease, using its well-documented API.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Santuario

  • Complexity
    Setting up and correctly configuring XML signatures and encryption can be complex, requiring a good understanding of cryptographic concepts.
  • Performance Overheads
    The use of XML security can introduce performance overheads, as processing of XML signatures and encryption is computationally intensive.
  • Documentation
    While documentation exists, it may not always cover every use case comprehensively, requiring developers to seek additional help or resources.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with XML security standards or Apache Santuario might face a steep learning curve when starting out.
  • Community Support
    The community is smaller compared to more popular open-source projects, which might limit the availability of third-party resources and support.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Axiom and Apache Santuario)
Text Editors
46 46%
54% 54
Databases
44 44%
56% 56
NoSQL Databases
55 55%
45% 45
Task Management
40 40%
60% 60

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Axiom and Apache Santuario. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Apache Santuario might be a bit more popular than Apache Axiom. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to Apache Axiom. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Axiom mentions (1)

Apache Santuario mentions (1)

  • Consuming SOAP and REST apis from my C++ application?
    I've just examined the structure of a standard SOAP package and yes - it looks easy as hell to build it myself. I already have tinyxml in my project, anyway. The only thing that leaves me in doubt is the xml signature. I am thinking about https://santuario.apache.org/ ? Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Axiom and Apache Santuario, you can also consider the following products

MarkLogic - Schema-agnostic Enterprise NoSQL database technology, coupled w/ powerful search & flexible application services

Qizx - XML Databases

Apache Anakia - XML Databases

Apache Xerces - Advanced XML parser, including support for XML Schema, DOM Level 2, and SAX.

BaseX - BaseX is a very light-weight, high-performance and scalable XML Database engine and XPath/XQuery...

Apache Xalan - XML Databases