Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache ActiveMQ VS Akka

Compare Apache ActiveMQ VS Akka and see what are their differences

Apache ActiveMQ logo Apache ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

Akka logo Akka

Build powerful reactive, concurrent, and distributed applications in Java and Scala
  • Apache ActiveMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01
  • Akka Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25

Apache ActiveMQ features and specs

  • Open Source
    ActiveMQ is open-source under the Apache License, making it free to use and modify. This can lead to cost savings compared to commercial solutions.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    ActiveMQ supports multiple messaging protocols, including AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, Stomp, and others, allowing for flexible integration with various systems and applications.
  • Java Integration
    Written in Java, ActiveMQ integrates well with JVM-based applications and other Apache projects like Camel and Karaf, making it a good fit for Java-centric environments.
  • High Availability
    Features like broker clustering, network of brokers, and failover support provide robust high availability options, ensuring message delivery even in case of failures.
  • Performance and Scalability
    ActiveMQ can handle a large number of messages and users by scaling horizontally, making it suitable for both small and enterprise-level applications.
  • Admin Console
    ActiveMQ provides a web-based admin console for easy management and monitoring of the message broker, simplifying administrative tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ActiveMQ

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for newcomers. It often requires a steep learning curve to understand all the available options and optimizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    ActiveMQ can be resource-intensive, particularly in high-throughput scenarios, which may necessitate more robust hardware for optimal performance.
  • Latency
    In certain configurations, ActiveMQ may exhibit higher latency compared to other brokers, which might not make it suitable for use cases requiring real-time guarantees.
  • Java Dependency
    As a Java-based solution, ActiveMQ requires the JVM, which can be a downside for organizations that have standardized on other technology stacks.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around ActiveMQ, it may not be as large or as active as those for other, similar open-source projects. This can lead to slower responses to issues and fewer community-based resources.
  • Documentation
    Though comprehensive, the documentation can sometimes be difficult to navigate, making it challenging for users to find specific information quickly.

Akka features and specs

  • Scalability
    Akka is designed to handle high concurrency and provides excellent scalability by leveraging the actor model, enabling developers to build distributed systems that can efficiently scale up or out across multiple nodes.
  • Resilience
    Akka promotes building systems that are resilient to failures, using features like supervision strategies and self-healing, to automatically recover from errors and maintain system stability and uptime.
  • Concurrency
    By using the actor model, Akka facilitates easier handling of concurrency, allowing developers to work with asynchronous and non-blocking message-driven communication that reduces complexities associated with multithreaded programming.
  • Flexibility
    Akka integrates with a broad ecosystem of tools and technologies and can be easily used with various JVM-based languages such as Scala and Java, providing flexibility in designing and implementing solutions.
  • Event-driven Architecture
    Akka supports building reactive, event-driven applications, which are responsive, maintainable, and adaptable to changing demands and requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Akka

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The actor model and the associated paradigms in Akka present a steep learning curve for developers who are accustomed to traditional object-oriented or procedural programming models.
  • Debugging Complexity
    Debugging in an actor-based system can be more challenging compared to traditional systems, due to the asynchronous nature of message passing and lack of a global state.
  • Overhead
    There can be additional overhead associated with context switching and message passing between actors, which might impact performance in scenarios with extremely high-frequency messaging.
  • Integration Challenges
    Integrating Akka with existing systems or libraries that are not designed for an actor-based model can pose challenges, requiring developers to adapt or wrap existing codebases.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    While the Akka ecosystem is growing, it still lacks the extensive tooling support found in more traditional frameworks, making certain tasks like monitoring and tracing more cumbersome.

Analysis of Apache ActiveMQ

Overall verdict

  • Apache ActiveMQ is generally considered a good choice for message brokering due to its comprehensive feature set, stability, and scalability. It is especially beneficial in environments where integration between different systems and technologies is necessary, thanks to its support of numerous messaging protocols.

Why this product is good

  • Apache ActiveMQ is a popular open-source message broker that is known for its flexibility and reliability. It supports multiple messaging protocols and offers features such as high availability, load balancing, and a robust set of messaging patterns. It is a mature project with a large user base and a supportive community. Its ability to integrate with various platforms and languages, along with its rich feature set, makes it a suitable choice for many applications requiring reliable message queuing.

Recommended for

    Apache ActiveMQ is recommended for enterprises looking for a reliable and scalable message broker, developers needing rich messaging functionality, and organizations that require robust support for various messaging protocols, including JMS, AMQP, STOMP, and MQTT. It is particularly well-suited for applications that need to distribute messages between different applications, languages, and platforms.

Apache ActiveMQ videos

No Apache ActiveMQ videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Akka videos

Hults Bruk Akka Forester Axe Review Gransfors Small Forest Axe Killer!?!

More videos:

  • Review - Review trรชn chรขn vร  cแบฃm nhแบญn ฤ‘รดi akka speed 2 cแปงa Viแป‡t Nam
  • Review - Revathi akka review world famous lover || FILM CITY

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache ActiveMQ and Akka)
Data Integration
83 83%
17% 17
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Stream Processing
100 100%
0% 0
Web Service Automation
81 81%
19% 19

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache ActiveMQ and Akka. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache ActiveMQ and Akka

Apache ActiveMQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022โ€™s Must-know List
ActiveMQ is a flexible, open-source, multi-protocol messaging broker that supports many protocols. This makes it easy for developers to use a variety of languages and platforms. The AMQP protocol facilitates integration with many applications based on different platforms. However, ActiveMQโ€™s high-end data accessibility capabilities are complemented by its load balancing,...
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
It is a managed information broker for Apache ActiveMQ which has simple installation and it runs message broker in cloud. It doesnโ€™t need any special look after regular management and maintenance of the message system. It is utilized to send bulk message services.
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Apache ActiveMQ is a popular, open-source, flexible multi-protocol messaging broker. Since it has great support for industry-based protocols, developers get access to languages and platforms. It helps in connecting clients written in languages like Python, C, C++, JavaScript, etc. With the help of the AMQP protocol, integration with many applications with different platforms...

Akka Reviews

Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
There are products like Akka Serverless and Akka Platform by Lightbend that can support business-driven applications. Akka is more of a set of libraries to design resilient systems spanning across networks. It helps developers in saving time over writing low-level code and instead, makes them focus on aligning to business objectives.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Akka should be more popular than Apache ActiveMQ. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache ActiveMQ mentions (7)

View more

Akka mentions (21)

  • Modern Async Primitives on iOS, Android, and the Web
    Kotlin also has a construct for asynchronous collections/streams. Kotlin's version of AsyncSequence is called a Flow. Just as Swift's AsyncSequence builds upon prior experience with RxSwift and Combine, Kotlin's Flow APIs build upon earlier stream/collection APIs in the JVM ecosystem: Java's RxJava, Java8 Streams, Project Reactor, and Scala's Akka. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • What are the current hot topics in type theory and static analysis?
    First-class distributed and multicore computing. Swift has first-class โ€œactorsโ€ and โ€œdistributedโ€ methods. Unison, Erlang, and Elixir are built with distributed being one of the #1 concerns. Though first-class is not super common and I don't really expect it to be because usually libraries are enough (e.g. Scala has Akka and is used WIDELY for distributed); whereas something like linear types and typed effects,... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Anything close beam/otp for other languages?
    Akka is a library that implements the actor model for JVM languages. Mainly in Scala, but you can use it in Java too, and maybe others. It doesn't feel as ergonomic as Elixir, but if Elixir is too "out there" for the decision makers in your case, this might be a friendlier alternative. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Kalix: Move to the Cloud. Extend to the Edge. Go Beyond.
    Kalix builds on the lessons we have learned from more than a decade of building Akka (leveraging the actor model) and our experience helping large (and small) enterprises move to the cloud and use it in the most time, cost, and resource-efficient way possible. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • About Elixir and the microservices architecture
    Note Akka, the Java & friends framework, is working with the actor model and have as main inspiration Erlang to mimic some features of the BEAM on top of the JVM. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache ActiveMQ and Akka, you can also consider the following products

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

Dapr - Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and Microservices Tools

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Jitterbit - Jitterbit is an open source integration software that helps businesses connect applications, data and systems.

ChannelGrabber - ChannelGrabber is omnichannel eCommerce software for product content optimization, listings, inventory, order, shipping, invoice and message management. Integrates with eBay, Amazon, Shopify, and more.