Software Alternatives & Startups

AngularUI VS Apache Shiro

Compare AngularUI VS Apache Shiro and see what are their differences

AngularUI

Native AngularJS directives for Bootstrap.

Rating
0 reviews
Apache Shiro

Apache Shiro is a Java security framework that performs authentication, authorization, cryptography, and session management.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Apache Shiro should be more popular than AngularUI. It has been mentioned 3 times since March 2021.

social mentions
1 vs 3
Development Tools popularity
83% vs 17%
alternatives listed
175 vs 57

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

AngularUI
Apache Shiro
Website angular-ui.github.io shiro.apache.org
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

AngularUI 4 features
Apache Shiro 0 features
  • Rich Component Library
    AngularUI provides a dense library of user interface components, including modals, custom select boxes, and sliders, reducing the amount of code you need to write and speeding up development.
  • Native to AngularJS
    Designed to work seamlessly with AngularJS, AngularUI widgets and directives integrate naturally with AngularJS, offering a more consistent and performant solution compared to external libraries.
  • Extensive Documentation
    AngularUI has comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to understand how to integrate and utilize components, which reduces the learning curve.
  • Active Community
    There is an active and supportive community surrounding AngularUI, ensuring that developers can find help and resources quickly.

Possible disadvantages

  • Dependency on AngularJS
    AngularUI is built for AngularJS, and it is not compatible with Angular (the newer version of AngularJS). This limits its usability for new projects that prefer to use the more recent frameworks.
  • Performance Overhead
    In some cases, the additional features and abstractions provided by AngularUI can introduce performance overhead, particularly in large or complex applications.
  • Stagnation Risk
    As AngularJS is an older framework, there's a risk that AngularUI will not receive as much support or updates in the future, leading to potential issues with maintainability and compatibility.
  • Limited Integration
    AngularUI may have limitations when integrating with other tools or libraries that are not within its ecosystem, which could lead to additional effort in making these work together.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

AngularUI
Apache Shiro

Overall verdict

  • AngularUI is generally considered a good choice for developers working with AngularJS due to its robust component set and strong community support. However, it's essential to note that AngularJS and its associated libraries, including AngularUI, have been succeeded by more modern frameworks such as Angular (Angular 2+) and React. For new projects, evaluating whether AngularJS or its libraries are the right choice, given their outdated status, is crucial.

Why this product is good

  • AngularUI, now part of the Angular ecosystem, provides a set of UI components that are highly modular and work well with AngularJS applications. It simplifies the development process by offering ready-to-use UI components like UI-Router and UI-Bootstrap, allowing developers to focus more on the application logic rather than the UI boilerplate. Its collaborative nature leverages the contributions from a large community, which ensures that it continuously evolves and adapts to modern development standards.

Recommended for

    AngularUI is recommended for developers maintaining legacy AngularJS applications that require enhancements and UI component implementations without adopting a completely new framework. It's also suitable for smaller projects where AngularJS is still preferred due to an organization's existing knowledge base. However, for new projects, one might consider more contemporary frameworks unless specific constraints necessitate using AngularJS.

Overall verdict

  • Apache Shiro is a solid, mature open-source security framework for Java applications that offers a simple, intuitive API for authentication, authorization, cryptography, and session management, making it a good choice for developers who want comprehensive security without excessive complexity.

Why this product is good

  • Easy-to-use, intuitive API that lowers the learning curve compared to some alternatives like Spring Security
  • Comprehensive feature set covering authentication, authorization, session management, and cryptography in one framework
  • Framework-agnostic design that works with or without a container and integrates with many environments
  • Built-in support for role-based and permission-based access control
  • Robust session management that works even in non-web and non-EJB environments
  • Backed by the Apache Software Foundation with an open-source, permissive license
  • Well-suited for both small and large applications with flexible configuration options

Recommended for

  • Java developers seeking a straightforward alternative to Spring Security
  • Applications requiring flexible session management across web and non-web contexts
  • Projects needing fine-grained role and permission-based authorization
  • Teams wanting an all-in-one security solution for authentication and cryptography
  • Enterprise and standalone Java applications that value simplicity and quick integration

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

AngularUI 2 videos + Add
Apache Shiro 0 videos + Add

Introduction to AngularUI and UI Bootstrap

More videos

  • - Introduction to AngularUI and UI Bootstrap

No Apache Shiro videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
AngularUI
Apache Shiro
83% 83%
17% 17%
90% 90%
10% 10%
0% 0%
UI
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using AngularUI and Apache Shiro. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

AngularUI 1 mention
Apache Shiro 3 mentions
  • AngularJS directive with default options
    I've had a look around for the way others have done this, and in the angular-ui library the ui.bootstrap.pagination seems to do something similar. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Show HN: Torii – a framework agnostic authentication library for Rust
    I think the most similar you'd find for Java are Shiro [0], Java Authentication and Authorization Service (JAAS) [1], and pac4j [2]. 0: https://shiro.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Serverless Apache Zeppelin on AWS
    The only missing feature in this architecture is the login and logout capability. In this case, Apache Zeppelin provides Shiro for notebook authentication. Apache Shiro is a powerful and easy-to-use Java security framework that performs... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Libraries, Frameworks and Technologies you would NOT recommend
    Apache Shiro is another security framework. I haven't tried it out myself, but I was sorely tempted to when trying to set up Spring Security. Source: over 5 years ago

Alternatives to AngularUI and Apache Shiro

When comparing AngularUI and Apache Shiro, you can also consider the following products.