Angular Material VS Lara

• Consistent Design
  Angular Material provides a set of reusable, well-tested, and accessible UI components based on the Material Design specification, ensuring a consistent look and feel across your application.
• Pre-built Components
  Offers a wide range of pre-built components including forms, navigation, buttons, and data tables that significantly speed up the development process.
• Responsiveness
  Components are designed to work smoothly on various screen sizes and resolutions, making it easier to create responsive applications.
• Integration with Angular
  Tightly integrated with Angular, making it easier to implement and maintain. It also leverages Angular’s features like reactive forms and change detection.
• Theming and Customization
  Supports extensive theming and customization options, allowing developers to tailor the look and feel of their applications to match brand requirements.
• Comprehensive Documentation
  Comes with detailed and comprehensive documentation, providing examples and guides to help developers get started quickly.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  Due to the extensive feature set and the intricacies of Material Design, there is a learning curve involved which might be difficult for beginners.
• Large Bundle Size
  Integrating Angular Material can add to the bundle size of your application, which may affect the loading time and performance, especially for smaller projects.
• Limited Customizability
  While it offers theming, there are limitations on how much components can be customized compared to creating bespoke solutions.
• Performance Overhead
  Some components come with additional performance overhead due to their complexity and the use of multiple dependencies.
• Dependency Management
  You need to manage and maintain additional dependencies that come with Angular Material, which can complicate the build process and dependency management.
• Opinionated Design
  Being based on Google’s Material Design, it might impose design choices that might not align with every project's design requirements.

• Open Source
  Lara is open source, allowing developers to freely use, modify, and distribute the software. This encourages collaboration and community-driven improvements.
• Community Support
  Being hosted on GitHub, Lara benefits from a wide range of developers contributing and sharing knowledge, aiding in problem solving and feature development.
• Customization
  Users can tailor the software to their specific needs by modifying the source code or adding new features through plugins or extensions.
• Transparency
  As an open-source project, all code and changes are publicly visible, ensuring transparency in development and security processes.

Possible disadvantages

• Lack of Official Support
  Unlike commercial software, open-source projects like Lara may not offer official support channels, requiring users to rely on community forums and GitHub issues for help.
• Potential Security Risks
  Open-source projects can sometimes have vulnerabilities, and without a dedicated security team, there might be delays in addressing these issues.
• Variable Documentation Quality
  The quality and comprehensiveness of documentation can vary, potentially making it challenging for new users to get started quickly and efficiently.
• Resource Intensity
  Deploying and maintaining an open-source project might require significant resources and skills, potentially increasing the overhead for organizations.

Angular Material Data Table Tutorial

More videos

Lara Croft: Tomb Raider - Hilariocity Review

More videos

• What is it about Internet, mobile, and web applications that makes everything seem sleeker every year?

  Very large companies (i.e. Google, Facebook, etc.) regularly publish their own UI frameworks and designs. For example, Facebook has a Material UI for React. Google has AngularJS material UI. These are all open-source and free to use. Source: about 5 years ago

Tracking Lara since Mar 2021.