Amazon Redshift Reviews

Temporal Reviews

Amazon Redshift mentions (30)

• What if ML pipelines had a lock file?

  Data Pipelines usually read from tables that change over time. Most of these tables are stored in a data warehouse like Amazon Redshift or Google BigQuery. Rows are added or removed. Backfills happen. A column gets renamed or its meaning changes. Even when teams snapshot data, those snapshots are often implicit, not recorded as part of the pipeline run itself. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

• How to Pitch Your Boss to Adopt Apache Iceberg?

  If your team is managing large volumes of historical data using platforms like Snowflake, Amazon Redshift, or Google BigQuery, you’ve probably noticed a shift happening in the data engineering world. A new generation of data infrastructure is forming — one that prioritizes openness, interoperability, and cost-efficiency. At the center of that shift is Apache Iceberg. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Everyone Uses Postgres… But Why?

  Postgres can be easily adapted to build highly tailored solutions. For instance, Amazon Redshift can be considered a highly scalable fork of Postgres. It’s a distributed database focusing on OLAP workloads that you can deploy in AWS. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• From ETL and ELT to Reverse ETL

  With the transition from ETL to ELT, data warehouses have ascended to the role of data custodians, centralizing customer data collected from fragmented systems. This pivotal shift has been enabled by a suite of powerful tools: Fivetran and Airbyte streamline the extraction and loading, DBT handles the transformation, and robust warehousing solutions like Snowflake and Redshift store the data. While traditionally... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• Choosing Between a Streaming Database and a Stream Processing Framework in Python

  They differ from conventional analytic databases like Snowflake, Redshift, BigQuery, and Oracle in several ways. Conventional databases are batch-oriented, loading data in defined windows like hourly, daily, weekly, and so on. While loading data, conventional databases lock the tables, making the newly loaded data unavailable until the batch load is fully completed. Streaming databases continuously receive new... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

Temporal mentions (16)

• Your Agent Bills While It Waits. Here's the Fix.

  Durable execution — the pattern implemented by Temporal, Inngest, Rivet Actors, and now Cloudflare Workflows — treats waiting as a continuation rather than a loop:. - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago

• Compiler as Custodian

  Two specific moves stand out in Duncan's account. The first is durable execution, via Temporal — Mercury replaced fragile cron-and-database state machines with workflow code whose failure semantics are platform-handled (replay, retry, timeout, cancellation). Mercury open-sourced its hs-temporal-sdk, which wraps Temporal's official Rust Core SDK via FFI and provides a Haskell-native API. The dovetail with Haskell's... - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago

• How we turned our workflow editor into a real SDK

  We picked Temporal as the first reference engine on purpose. Temporal has the strictest execution model we know of – a V8 sandbox, determinism constraints, replay-driven recovery. If our port contract holds up against that, easier engines – an in-memory test double, a BullMQ queue, or JSON-first platforms like Inngest or Restate – plug in through the same two interfaces. We're shipping Temporal first; the rest is... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Three days debugging a missing trace

  The trick is to find whatever metadata channel the queue already gives you and use that and thankfully, almost every mature queue has one (probably because of this scenario). SQS has message attributes, Temporal has context propagators built into the SDK, and Hatchet (which we use to run our workflows) has a metadata field called additionalMetadata. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Best ChatGPT Alternatives in 2026: Evaluated on Automation, Persistence, and Data Ownership

  A typical production stack for teams using Claude or Gemini as the reasoning layer includes an LLM provider API, an orchestration layer (n8n, Temporal, or a custom Python service), application infrastructure (a server running the orchestration code), and a data layer (a database for storing results). Each boundary introduces a failure point. When the LLM provider changes its rate limits, as OpenAI did repeatedly... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago