Amazon AWS
Google Cloud Platform
DigitalOcean
Microsoft Azure
Linode
Heroku
Vultr
CloudFlare
Rclone
Restic
Syncthing
Cryptomator
FreeFileSync
Cyberduck
odrive
Duplicati
Amazon AWS RcloneRclone is recommended for IT professionals, cloud administrators, developers, and tech enthusiasts who need a powerful tool for handling cloud storage tasks. It's particularly suitable for users who have experience with command-line tools and who need to manage large-scale data transfers across multiple cloud environments efficiently.
You could say a lot of things about AWS, but among the cloud platforms (and I've used quite a few) AWS takes the cake. It is logically structured, you can get through its documentation relatively easily, you have a great variety of tools and services to choose from [from AWS itself and from third-party developers in their marketplace]. There is a learning curve, there is quite a lot of it, but it is still way easier than some other platforms. I've used and abused AWS and EC2 specifically and for me it is the best.
I was looking for a GUI for rclone and found one. I am so happy for this software it has made working with rclone so much easier, and so far it has worked PERFECT. I love it!!!
Rclone might be a bit more popular than Amazon AWS. We know about 635 links to it since March 2021 and only 486 links to Amazon AWS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
In conclusion, Cloudflare Workers and AWS Lambda are two popular edge computing solutions that offer a range of benefits, including reduced latency, improved performance, and enhanced security. By understanding the key differences between these solutions, businesses can make informed decisions about which one to use. Whether you're building a real-time analytics application or a serverless API, Cloudflare Workers... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
> but it's still a singleton instance, so where do you run it? Most hardware doesn't give you enough uptime for what you need here, because what you actually needed was a re-architecture for distribution / failover / whatever, and while you could ask your LLM to do that you aren't going to run your bank on the result. If only we had a way to solve these issues with tools capable of running Rust programs in that... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Not because infrastructure isn't important. It is. Not because Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a bad platform. It isn't. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
The AWS S3 documentation covers all of these in detail. The configuration takes about an hour to get right the first time and rarely needs changes after. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
The first pattern is direct-to-storage. The client uploads chunks directly to an object storage service like Amazon S3 using pre-signed URLs. The application server creates the upload session and grants permission but never sees the file bytes. This pattern scales well because the application servers do not handle the upload bandwidth. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
While there isn't a proper Linux client, if you find yourself on a Linux box and need to sync to or from iCloud, rclone[1] works great. Just putting this out there in the hope that it might help someone. It's also (ironically given TFA) what I used to sync all my files off dropbox when I cancelled my subscription because of their misuse of root to re-add their thing to special permissions on macOs after I had... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Hello, as always: imho (!) tar is great, and well kown - but not particularly for "incremental backups over the net" ... This is what rsync is/was for. Idk ... Whatever the problem is with rsync, but apparently thats none of my business ;)) you could use, which usage is very similar to rsync: rclone * https://rclone.org/ intro. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
For backups I use a script with a systemd timer and rclone. Rclone is a very flexible and configurable Tool, and it can be configured with a lot of services. I use it mainly with web dav, smb and Google Drive. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
You can schedule the takeout to Drive, then use a tool such as rclone (amazing tool) to pull it down. It should not add any costs except the storage for the takeout zip on drive. Look at supported providers in rclone and you might find easy solutions for some hard sync problems: https://rclone.org/#providers. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Just offering some advice if you aren't aware. If you are, freely ignore. For convenience, the rclone tool is nice for most cloud storage like google and stuff that make rsync annoying[0] rsync also offers compression[1], and you might want to balance it depending if you want to be CPU bound or IO bound. You can pick the compression and level, with more options than just the `-z` flag. You can also increase speed... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Google Cloud Platform - Google Cloud provides flexible infrastructure, end-to-security, modern productivity, and intelligent insights engineered to help your business thrive.
Restic - Easy: Doing backups should be a frictionless process, otherwise you are tempted to skip it.
DigitalOcean - Simplifying cloud hosting. Deploy an SSD cloud server in 55 seconds.
Syncthing - Syncthing replaces proprietary sync and cloud services with something open, trustworthy and...
Microsoft Azure - Windows Azure and SQL Azure enable you to build, host and scale applications in Microsoft datacenters.
Cryptomator - When it comes to saving your files on a cloud server, it is important to ensure the security of those files. Keeping your delicate files out of the wrong hands can save you a lot of time and hassle. Read more about Cryptomator.
