Software Alternatives & Startups

Amazon Aurora VS EdgeDB

Compare Amazon Aurora VS EdgeDB and see what are their differences

Amazon Aurora

MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud. Performance and availability of commercial-grade databases at 1/10th the cost.

Rating
0 reviews
EdgeDB

EdgeDB is a next-generation graph-relational database that lets you easily build flexible, scalable applications in real-time.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Amazon Aurora should be more popular than EdgeDB. It has been mentioned 28 times since March 2021.

social mentions
28 vs 4
Databases popularity
82% vs 18%
alternatives listed
144 vs 63

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Amazon Aurora
EdgeDB
Website aws.amazon.com edgedb.com
Pricing —
Open source
Company 2014 —
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Amazon Aurora 11 features
EdgeDB 5 features
  • High Performance
    Amazon Aurora is designed to provide up to five times the throughput of standard MySQL and three times the throughput of standard PostgreSQL databases.
  • Scalability
    Aurora scales storage automatically, growing from 10GB up to 128TB with no downtime. This automatic scaling makes it ideal for applications with fluctuating workloads.
  • High Availability and Durability
    Aurora automatically replicates six copies of data across three availability zones and continuously backs up data to Amazon S3, ensuring durability.
  • Security
    Aurora offers multiple layers of security including network isolation using Amazon VPC, encryption at rest using keys that you create and control through AWS Key Management Service (KMS), and encryption of data in transit using SSL.
  • Fully Managed
    Aurora is fully managed by AWS, which automates time-consuming administrative tasks such as hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.
  • Compatibility
    Aurora is compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL, making it easier to migrate existing applications to Aurora with minimal changes.
  • Immutability
    Amazon QLDB uses an immutable transaction log, which ensures that all changes to the data are permanent and cannot be deleted or altered. This enables high data integrity and supports cryptographic verification.
  • Serverless Architecture
    QLDB is serverless, meaning that it automatically scales according to your needs. You don’t have to worry about managing and provisioning servers, thus reducing operational complexity.
  • Integrated with AWS Ecosystem
    Being part of AWS, QLDB can easily integrate with other AWS services, such as AWS Lambda, Amazon S3, and Amazon CloudWatch, providing a seamless experience for building applications.
  • ACID Transactions
    QLDB supports ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) transactions, ensuring data integrity, which is crucial for applications that require reliable transaction guarantees.
  • Cryptographic Verification
    The ledger uses a cryptographic hashing process to create a chain of blocks, allowing you to verify the integrity of your data over time.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Aurora can be more expensive than traditional RDS instances, particularly for workloads that do not fully utilize its high performance and scalability features.
  • Complexity
    The numerous features and configurations can make Aurora complex to manage and tune, especially for those who are not familiar with AWS services.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Adopting Aurora ties you into the AWS ecosystem, which can make it difficult to migrate to other cloud providers or on-premises systems.
  • Cold Start Latency
    Aurora Serverless can experience latency during cold starts, which can be problematic for applications requiring instant scalability.
  • Limited to AWS Environment
    Aurora is only available within the AWS environment, which can be limiting if your infrastructure spans multiple cloud providers.
  • Limited Query Language
    QLDB uses PartiQL, which while powerful, may not support the full range of complex queries and functionality available in more mature query languages like SQL.
  • Not a Blockchain
    QLDB provides blockchain-like capabilities but is not a decentralized blockchain. This means it does not have the decentralized features of public blockchains, such as Bitcoin or Ethereum.
  • Performance Overhead
    The immutable nature of QLDB can introduce performance overhead, especially for write-heavy applications, which could be a concern in performance-sensitive environments.
  • Graph-Relational Model
    EdgeDB combines the features of relational and graph databases, allowing for complex queries and relationships while maintaining data integrity typical in relational databases.
  • Advanced Query Language (EdgeQL)
    EdgeQL offers a more intuitive and expressive query syntax compared to traditional SQL, facilitating easier and more efficient data retrieval.
  • Schema Evolution
    EdgeDB provides robust tools for schema migrations and versioning, making it easier to evolve the database schema without downtime or data loss.
  • Type Safety
    With its strong typing system, EdgeDB reduces runtime errors by ensuring data type consistency across the database operations.
  • Integrated Indexing and Constraints
    EdgeDB supports advanced indexing and constraints, improving query performance and maintaining data integrity natively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Relative Newness
    Being relatively new in the market, EdgeDB might lack extensive community support and third-party integrations compared to more established databases.
  • Learning Curve
    Technicians accustomed to traditional SQL or other database paradigms might face a learning curve when adapting to EdgeDB's unique features and query language.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    EdgeDB's ecosystem, including tooling, documentation, and community resources, is less mature compared to other well-established database systems.
  • Potential for Rapid Changes
    As a developing technology, EdgeDB may undergo rapid changes and updates, which may lead to instability or additional maintenance overhead.
  • Hosting and Compatibility Concerns
    Deploying EdgeDB might have specific hosting requirements, and compatibility with existing infrastructure could be a concern for some users.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Amazon Aurora
EdgeDB

Overall verdict

  • Amazon Aurora is generally regarded as an excellent database service for businesses that require robust performance and high availability. It strikes a balance between cost-effectiveness and advanced database features, making it suitable for a wide range of applications.

Why this product is good

  • Amazon Aurora is considered a good choice for many applications due to its high performance, scalability, and compatibility with popular database systems like MySQL and PostgreSQL. It offers features like automated backups, quick failover, and replication capabilities. Aurora is designed to be fault-tolerant and highly available, providing a fully managed solution that relieves users from the operational burden associated with on-premise database management.

Recommended for

    Amazon Aurora is recommended for organizations that need reliable, scalable, and high-performance databases. It is well-suited for web and mobile applications, e-commerce platforms, real-time analytics, and other use cases requiring high availability and fault tolerance. It's ideal for businesses looking to modernize their database infrastructure and take advantage of cloud-native capabilities.

No analysis of EdgeDB yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Amazon Aurora 4 videos + Add
EdgeDB 3 videos + Add

Getting started with Amazon QLDB

More videos

  • - Introduction to Amazon Aurora - Relational Database Built for the Cloud - AWS
  • - Amazon Aurora Global Database Deep Dive
  • - What's New in Amazon Aurora - AWS Online Tech Talks

Checking out EdgeDB - The Developer Database (Better than Prisma ORM?!)

More videos

  • - EdgeDB 2.0 Launch
  • - The architecture of EdgeDB — Fantix King | EdgeDB Day

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Amazon Aurora
EdgeDB
82% 82%
18% 18%
92% 92%
8% 8%
58% 58%
42% 42%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Amazon Aurora and EdgeDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Amazon Aurora no reviews yet
EdgeDB no reviews yet

We have no reviews of EdgeDB yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Amazon Aurora 28 mentions
EdgeDB 4 mentions

View more

  • Beyond SQL: A relational database for modern applications
    A new DB, with a new query language that's like "SQL done right"? This immediately reminded me of EdgeDB: https://edgedb.com/ Is there anyone here who knows enough about these two products to do a compare/contrast? - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Beyond SQL: A relational database for modern applications
    See also https://edgedb.com/ which is another relational database without sql. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • DuckDB 0.8.0
    >relational no-sql Do you mean something like edgeDB?[0] Or do you mean some non-declarative language completely? I don't see the latter making much sense. The issue with SQL for me is the "natural language" which quickly loses all... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Amazon Aurora and EdgeDB

When comparing Amazon Aurora and EdgeDB, you can also consider the following products.