Software Alternatives & Startups

AI Limits VS ccusage

Compare AI Limits VS ccusage and see what are their differences

AI Limits

Claude, Codex, Copilot and Antigravity limits in one acrylic widget. Reads your existing CLI logins, no API keys. Free and open source.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
ccusage

Usage analysis tool for coding (agent) CLIs

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ccusage seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 3 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 3
Developer Tools popularity
19% vs 81%
alternatives listed
30 vs 56

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

AI Limits
ccusage
Website napxlexn.github.io ccusage.com
Pricing —
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

AI Limits 5 features
ccusage 5 features
  • Free to use
    As a GitHub Pages hosted site, AI Limits is likely free for anyone to access without requiring payment or subscription.
  • Simple and lightweight
    Being hosted as a static GitHub Pages site suggests the tool is likely simple, fast-loading, and doesn't require complex installations.
  • Accessible anywhere
    Since it's a web-based tool, it can be accessed from any device with a browser and internet connection, without needing to download software.
  • No account required
    Many GitHub Pages tools like this don't require sign-up or login, allowing immediate use without creating an account.
  • Open source potential
    Tools hosted on GitHub often have publicly available source code, allowing users to review how it works or contribute improvements.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited information available
    Without extensive documentation or reviews, it can be difficult to verify the full functionality, accuracy, or reliability of the tool before use.
  • Possible lack of ongoing support
    Personal or hobby projects hosted on GitHub Pages may not receive regular updates, bug fixes, or customer support.
  • Uncertain scope of features
    The name suggests it may track or calculate AI usage limits, but the actual scope and depth of features is unclear without direct testing.
  • No guaranteed data security
    As a smaller, independently hosted tool, there may be less transparency or assurance regarding how any input data is handled or stored.
  • Dependent on GitHub Pages uptime
    Since it relies on GitHub Pages hosting, availability is tied to that platform's uptime and the maintainer's continued hosting of the repository.
  • Easy to use CLI
    ccusage provides a simple command-line interface for analyzing Claude Code usage from local JSONL files, making it quick to get started without complex setup.
  • Detailed cost breakdown
    It offers detailed reports on token usage and costs broken down by day, month, session, or billing blocks, helping users understand exactly where their usage and spending are going.
  • No API key required
    Since it reads local usage data files directly rather than calling an API, it doesn't require additional API keys or credentials to generate reports.
  • Open source and free
    ccusage is an open-source tool, allowing users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the codebase, and use it without licensing costs.
  • Multiple output formats
    It supports various output formats including tables and JSON, making it flexible for both human review and integration into other scripts or dashboards.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Claude Code
    ccusage is specifically designed for analyzing Claude Code usage data, so it isn't useful for tracking usage of other AI tools or platforms.
  • Depends on local data files
    The tool relies on local JSONL log files generated by Claude Code, so if those files are missing, corrupted, or in an unexpected format, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate.
  • Requires Node.js environment
    Since it's a CLI tool typically run via Node.js or npm/npx, users need to have a compatible JavaScript runtime installed, which may be a barrier for non-developers.
  • Manual updates needed
    As Claude Code's data format or features evolve, ccusage may require manual updates to stay compatible, and users need to keep the tool updated themselves.
  • Limited visualization options
    The tool primarily focuses on text-based or tabular output, lacking built-in rich graphical visualizations that some users might want for deeper analysis.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
AI Limits
ccusage
19% 19%
81% 81%
33% 33%
67% 67%
0% 0%
100% 100%
28% 28%
AI
72% 72%

User comments

Share your experience with using AI Limits and ccusage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

AI Limits 0 mentions
ccusage 3 mentions

Tracking AI Limits since Sep 2026.

  • I built an AI usage tracker. Here are five alternatives, and why I took a different approach
    Ccusage reads local coding-agent logs and produces token and estimated-cost reports. Its documentation covers Claude Code, Codex and other supported CLIs, including JSON output, cache accounting and an offline mode using cached pricing.... - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago
  • Mistral Large 4
    You can confirm the allowed usage amounts with something like [ccusage](https://ccusage.com/) or [tokscale](https://tokscale.ai/). - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • tokenmaxxing: track AI coding usage across tools and devices
    Tokenmaxxing is our open-source CLI and public leaderboard for bringing those daily totals together. It builds on ccusage and syncs usage to one public profile. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

Alternatives to AI Limits and ccusage

When comparing AI Limits and ccusage, you can also consider the following products.