Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Aftertouch VS Pl@ntNet

Compare Aftertouch VS Pl@ntNet and see what are their differences

Not enough products to filter down. Redirecting to the primary Subscription.

Aftertouch logo Aftertouch

Aftertouch โ€“ 3D MIDI Controller created and published by Kevin Nelson.

Pl@ntNet logo Pl@ntNet

Pl@ntNet is an intelligent tool that allows user to identify the plats based on pictures with the help of your smartphone.
  • Aftertouch Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-05-14
  • Pl@ntNet Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-06

Aftertouch features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Aftertouch offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users of all technical skill levels.
  • Customizable Templates
    The platform provides a wide variety of customizable templates that allow users to create personalized and professional-looking projects.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Aftertouch includes a comprehensive set of features such as advanced editing tools, special effects, and seamless integration with other multimedia software.
  • Cloud Storage
    The service offers cloud storage solutions, enabling users to save and access their projects from anywhere with an internet connection.
  • Regular Updates
    The development team frequently updates the platform, ensuring it remains current with the latest technology and user needs.

Possible disadvantages of Aftertouch

  • Subscription Cost
    While Aftertouch offers a robust service, it comes with a subscription cost that might be a barrier for some users, especially those on a tight budget.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the rich feature set can present a learning curve for new users who may find it overwhelming at first.
  • Internet Dependence
    Since it offers cloud storage, a stable internet connection is required for optimal use, which might be limiting in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of Aftertouch has limited features and storage, which may not be sufficient for professional or extensive usage.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported occasional performance issues such as lagging or crashing, particularly with large or complex projects.

Pl@ntNet features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Pl@ntNet offers a simple and intuitive interface that allows users to easily upload images and receive plant identification results, making it accessible for both amateur and professional botanists.
  • Community Contribution
    The platform allows users to contribute images and observations, enabling a collaborative effort to improve and expand the database, enhancing the accuracy of identifications over time.
  • Extensive Database
    Pl@ntNet covers a wide range of plant species globally, providing a comprehensive resource for identifying a vast array of plants, trees, and flowers from different regions.
  • Free Access
    The tool is available for free, making it accessible to anyone interested in plant identification without the need for a subscription or payment.
  • Scientific Collaboration
    Pl@ntNet collaborates with various scientific institutions, ensuring that the database is enriched with scientifically validated information and expert contributions.

Possible disadvantages of Pl@ntNet

  • Internet Dependency
    Pl@ntNet requires an internet connection to access its database and identification services, which can be a limitation in remote areas with poor connectivity.
  • Accuracy Limitations
    While the platform is generally accurate, there can be occasional errors in identification, especially for less common species or images of poor quality.
  • Limited Offline Features
    The app may lack robust offline capabilities, limiting its use in fieldwork situations where immediate internet access is not available.
  • Dependence on Image Quality
    The identification accuracy highly depends on the quality and clarity of the images submitted, requiring users to provide clear and detailed photographs.
  • Not a Comprehensive Guide
    While it is a useful tool for initial identification, Pl@ntNet is not a substitute for expert botanical knowledge and should be supplemented with professional advice for precise identification.

Analysis of Aftertouch

Overall verdict

  • Good

Why this product is good

  • Aftertouch.com is a well-regarded platform due to its comprehensive tutorials and community-driven support for musicians and producers interested in electronic music. The site offers a variety of resources, including detailed tutorials, tips for music production, and forums where users can share advice and collaborate on projects. This makes it a valuable resource for both beginners and experienced users looking to enhance their skills or connect with like-minded individuals.

Recommended for

  • Electronic music producers
  • Musicians looking to learn music production
  • Individuals interested in sound design
  • Community-oriented users who enjoy collaborative learning

Aftertouch videos

HYDRASYNTH: Full Review // Keyboard vs Desktop // Poly aftertouch tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - Tips - What is aftertouch? // Novation
  • Review - Korg DW-8000 Review & Guide - Pt.8: Aftertouch

Pl@ntNet videos

Pl@ntNet - Plant Identification App Preview

More videos:

  • Review - Plant Identification Apps (Pl@ntnet, Plantsnap, etc.) | Bushcraft Bullsh*t (Ep 2):
  • Review - Dรฉmo Pl@ntNet

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Aftertouch and Pl@ntNet)
Music
100 100%
0% 0
Online Services
0 0%
100% 100
Audio & Music
100 100%
0% 0
Tool
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Aftertouch and Pl@ntNet. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Pl@ntNet seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Aftertouch mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Aftertouch yet. Tracking of Aftertouch recommendations started around May 2021.

Pl@ntNet mentions (4)

  • What kind of tree is this? I've had two in my backyard for 20 years and never knew what they were called. (Multiple photos, Houston TX)
    There are a number of phone apps that will identify trees from a picture. I personally prefer plantnet.org (non-profit entity / no ads or tracking). Source: over 3 years ago
  • Could Someone Help Me Identify This Tree; is it Even a Tree?
    You can also go directly to plantnet.org and perform the same check. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Tree book for Europe
    Get the app from plantnet.org. It's developed by a non-profit consortium of European organizations. I promise it's completely ad free and won't terrorize you in any way. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Trees Image Dataset
    You could scrape them off the plantnet.org site. But unless your problem is purely academic you could skip creating your own engine and just use their API. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Aftertouch and Pl@ntNet, you can also consider the following products

Figure - Propellerhead creates world-class software products and services that inspire music makers and provide the foundation for a worldwide creative musical community.

Gardenia - Gardenia is the new gardening application in the town!

SoundGrail - SoundGrail Music App designed for pianists, guitarists, and DJs.

Garden Answers - Garden Answers is an online plant identification application that allows you to get detailed information about any plants or flowers in your garden.

keezy - A colorful soundboard. Play with music.

iNaturalist - iNaturalist is known as one of the most popular nature applications that helps you to identify the animals, plants, insects, and lots of other things with just a single click.