
DocuSign
Dropbox Sign
PandaDoc
SignNow
SignEasy
DocHub
SignRequest
Cloud-based eSignature solution

supastarter
ShipFa.st
NextBase
Nexty.dev
MkSaaS
GetCreator.dev
SaaSykit
SaaS starter kits for Next.js, TanStack Start, and React Router on Supabase, Drizzle, or Prisma. Teams, billing, and AGENTS.md + MCP for coding agents.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Makerkit.dev should be more popular than Adobe Sign. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | adobe.com | makerkit.dev |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from Singapore · 1 - 9 employees · 2022 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Adobe Sign yet.
Makerkit is a SaaS starter kit for building multi-tenant B2B apps in TypeScript. Kits are available for Next.js and TanStack Start on Supabase, Drizzle, or Prisma, and for React Router on Supabase. The Drizzle and Prisma kits use Better Auth and run on any Postgres database. Every kit includes...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How to get clients to SIGN THEIR CONTRACT electronically (Adobe Sign Review | electronic signature!)
More videos
No Makerkit.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Adobe Sign and Makerkit.dev.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
Indie Hackers and Companies who want to launch quickly, without compromising on quality.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
Makerkit uses Next.js 15 (App Router), Supabase, React.js, Typescript and Stripe.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
Makerkit stands out by offering a truly modular architecture built with Turborepo, where core features like auth, billing, and notifications live in their own packages for better maintainability.
While most starters lock you into specific patterns or providers, Makerkit gives you flexibility with a multi-account system supporting both B2B and B2C scenarios, provider-agnostic billing, and edge-ready deployment options.
Beyond the basics, it includes production-ready features like multi-factor auth, real-time notifications, and team permissions - all built with Supabase, TypeScript, React Query, and modern tooling to make development a genuine pleasure.
Makerkit.dev's answer:
While other starters give you basic auth and a dashboard, Makerkit provides a genuinely modular foundation with the real features SaaS products need - like multi-factor auth, team permissions, real-time notifications, and provider-agnostic billing, all organized in clean, maintainable packages using Turborepo.
You get a first-class developer experience with TypeScript, React Query, and modern tooling, plus the flexibility to support both B2B and B2C scenarios, different payment providers, and edge deployment options.
Best of all, Makerkit is actively maintained with regular updates and responsive support, so you're building on a foundation that grows with your needs rather than painting yourself into a corner.
Share your experience with using Adobe Sign and Makerkit.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Compliance management: Adobe Sign stands out for its security and compliance with regulations, no matter your industry or location. It can be set up to meet specific industry rules like HIPAA, FERPA and others.
Adobe Sign is a powerful e-signature platform from Adobe that integrates seamlessly with other Adobe products like Acrobat Pro.
We have no reviews of Makerkit.dev yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Because I'm strictly paperless, I subscribe to Adobe products which includes Adobe esignatures. https://acrobat.adobe.com/us/en/sign.html Can anyone think of a reason to not use these to sign returns? Source: over 5 years ago
Price: $299 (Pro, individual) / $599 (Teams, 5 collaborators) - one-time, lifetime access URL: makerkit.dev. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
I saw these ones mentioned in an HN comment: - https://achromatic.dev - https://makerkit.dev - https://www.spirokit.com/ - https://saasykit.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
When comparing Adobe Sign and Makerkit.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Try DocuSign's interactive signing demo now! Send yourself an electronic document to digitally sign using our e-signature service.
Compare DocuSign to Adobe Sign or Makerkit.dev:

The boilerplate for your next web app built on top of Supabase and Next.js.
Compare supastarter to Adobe Sign or Makerkit.dev:

eSignatures Simplified. The Most Powerful Platform for Your Business Agreements.
Compare Dropbox Sign to Adobe Sign or Makerkit.dev:

The NextJS boilerplate with all the stuff you need to get your product in front of customers. From idea to production in 5 minutes.
Compare ShipFa.st to Adobe Sign or Makerkit.dev:

Boost your revenue with PandaDoc. A document automation tool that delivers higher close rates and shorter sales cycles. We've helped over 30,000+ companies.
Compare PandaDoc to Adobe Sign or Makerkit.dev:

Built your SAAS quickly and skip the boring parts
Compare NextBase to Adobe Sign or Makerkit.dev: