Software Alternatives & Startups

Active Admin VS Ping Identity

Compare Active Admin VS Ping Identity and see what are their differences

Active Admin

The administration framework for business critical Ruby on Rails applications.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Ping Identity

Ping Identity provides cloud-based, single sign-on and identity management solutions with their SAML SSO.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Active Admin seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 12 times since March 2021.

social mentions
12 vs 0
Developer Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
59 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Active Admin
Ping Identity
Website activeadmin.info pingidentity.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Active Admin 4 features
Ping Identity 5 features
  • Rapid Development
    Active Admin allows for rapid development of back-end administration dashboards without having to code everything from scratch. It provides a default set of controllers, routes, and views that can be easily customized.
  • Rails Integration
    Built specifically for Ruby on Rails applications, Active Admin leverages Rails conventions and integrates seamlessly with its ecosystem, enabling a familiar and efficient development experience for Rails developers.
  • Rich Features
    Active Admin comes with a wide range of features like authentication, authorization, filtering, searching, and custom actions which can be customized to fit business requirements.
  • Community and Documentation
    Active Admin has a strong community and well-maintained documentation which provides support and resources for developers. The community contributes by sharing plugins and solutions to common problems.

Possible disadvantages

  • Customization Complexity
    Once you move beyond basic customizations, making extensive changes to the default behavior or appearance can be complex and require a deeper understanding of both Active Admin and Rails.
  • Performance
    Due to the abstraction and additional layers provided by Active Admin, it might not be the best choice for high-performance applications, especially when dealing with large datasets.
  • Dependency on Rails
    Active Admin is tightly coupled with Rails, which means it cannot be used for non-Rails applications, limiting its use for projects not based on this framework.
  • Version Compatibility
    As both Rails and Active Admin evolve, there might be compatibility issues between different versions, which could require upgrades or modifications in your existing codebase.
  • Comprehensive Identity Management
    Ping Identity provides a wide range of identity management solutions, including single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), and API security, making it a complete package for enterprise identity management.
  • Scalability
    It is designed to scale efficiently with the growth of an organization, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises.
  • Strong Security Features
    Ping Identity includes robust security features such as risk-based authentication, adaptive authentication, and threat detection capabilities.
  • User Experience
    The platform focuses on delivering seamless user experiences with features like password-less authentication and frictionless SSO across multiple applications.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It offers extensive integration capabilities with a wide range of applications, both on-premises and cloud-based, including popular SaaS providers.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity
    Given the comprehensive nature of its features, Ping Identity can be complex to implement and may require specialized knowledge and expertise.
  • Cost
    The extensive range of features and scalability come at a cost, which might be prohibitive for smaller businesses with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its sophisticated features, there is a steep learning curve for administrators and users who are new to the platform.
  • Customization
    While highly capable, customization for specific needs might require significant effort and sometimes additional support from Ping Identity.
  • Support Dependency
    Organizations may find themselves reliant on Ping Identity's support services for troubleshooting and maintenance, which could lead to higher ongoing costs.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Active Admin
Ping Identity

No analysis of Active Admin yet.

Overall verdict

  • Ping Identity is generally considered a good option for identity and access management solutions.

Why this product is good

  • Ping Identity is known for its robust security features, flexible deployment options, and comprehensive identity management capabilities. It offers a range of services including single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and API security, which are appreciated by many enterprises. It also supports a wide variety of integrations and has a strong reputation for reliability and customer service.

Recommended for

    Ping Identity is well-suited for medium to large enterprises looking for scalable identity solutions, especially those wanting to enhance their security posture, achieve regulatory compliance, or improve the user experience with smoother access management.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Active Admin 1 video + Add
Ping Identity 2 videos + Add

Harry Potter and the Active Admin

Okta vs. Ping Identity - Which Stock to Buy? Identity and Access Management (IAM) Cloud Stocks

More videos

  • - Stocks Close Strong; Vertex, Ping Identity, ResMed Clear Buy Points

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Active Admin
Ping Identity
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Active Admin and Ping Identity. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Active Admin no reviews yet
Ping Identity no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Active Admin yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Active Admin 12 mentions
Ping Identity 0 mentions
  • Goravel: A Go framework inspired by Laravel
    Same reason IDEs — when you really know them — allow for quicker development compared to using primitive text editors with a bunch of third-party plugins duck-taped together. When you understand the framework, everything is... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Use Rails
    Rails is absolutely fantastic for projects below 10,000 lines with 1 or 2 contributors, especially if you want a classic forms-based UI. And you can get a huge amount done under those constraints in Rails. But as of couple of... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Why aren't Django Admin style dashboards popular in other frameworks?
    Can you clarify what's the "tremendous value" you're getting out of the Django admin? At Heii On-Call https://heiioncall.com/ we are using Active Admin https://activeadmin.info/ for Ruby on Rails, which seems quite similar to the Django... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

View more

Tracking Ping Identity since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Active Admin and Ping Identity

When comparing Active Admin and Ping Identity, you can also consider the following products.