
Grails
Play Framework
Apache Wicket
Vaadin Framework
Adonis JS
Sinatra
Falcon
ActFramework is a full stack Java MVC framework. The experience of using Act is very much like using a combination of SpringBoot and Play!Framework 1.x. It got the best parts of both products without the cons.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, FastAPI seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 315 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | fastapi.tiangolo.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from Colombia |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of ActFramework yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No ActFramework videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
FastAPI from the ground up
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using ActFramework and FastAPI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of ActFramework yet. Be the first one to post
When our backend team needs to build services for data parsing, aggregators, or high-load APIs, FastAPI is our absolute go-to choice. It completely lives up to its name-development speed is outstanding. The...
FastAPI, as the name hints, is a swift mover. Built on Starlette, it’s all about speed and performance with Python. Crafting API masterpieces at the speed of light, now that’s something.
Since its release in 2018, it has rapidly gained popularity due to its great performance and simplicity. In fact, according to PyPi Stats, FastAPI has over 9 million monthly downloads, surpassing even full-stack...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking ActFramework since Mar 2021.
Using FastAPI, FastStream, and dishka lets us follow Clean Architecture principles and almost avoid leaky abstractions. The prototype also used Pydantic and SQLAlchemy. I do not focus on them because these technologies are already... - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
If your FastAPI app talks to a database through SQLAlchemy, chances are high you will meet it sooner or later. Not on your machine, of course. It shows up in production, after a few quiet hours, under load. And the reflex is always the... - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago
API: FastAPI with async SQLAlchemy, PostgreSQL 17 for data, Redis for caching and rate limits. The cache is invalidated by a single version counter bumped on every write: no fine-grained purging to manage. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago
When comparing ActFramework and FastAPI, you can also consider the following products.

An Open Source, full stack, web application framework for the JVM
Compare Grails to ActFramework or FastAPI:

a microframework for Python based on Werkzeug, Jinja 2 and good intentions.
Compare Flask to ActFramework or FastAPI:

An open source web framework which follows the model-view-controller architecture. It is light-weight, web-friendly, and stateless. It provides minimal overhead for highly-scalable applications.
Compare Play Framework to ActFramework or FastAPI:

Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple
Compare ExpressJS to ActFramework or FastAPI:

HelloWorld demonstrates the basic structure of a web application in Wicket. A Label component is used to display a message on the home page for the application. In all the Wicket examples, you have to put all files in the same package directory.
Compare Apache Wicket to ActFramework or FastAPI:

The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
Compare Django to ActFramework or FastAPI: