
Pusher
Socket.io
PubNub
Firebase
Liveblocks
Tip Tap
SendBird
The realtime platform that just works. We power more WebSocket connections than any other pub/sub platform, serving over 2 billion devices monthly.

GitHub Codespaces
Gitpod
replit
Coder
CodeSandbox
Cloud AI workstation that keeps your coding agents running after you disconnect.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Ably seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 26 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | ably.com | holycode.cloud |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from the United Kingdom · 50 - 99 employees · 2016 | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


We help teams deliver resilient AI UX and high-performance live experiences that stay fast and in sync worldwide. We provide the global realtime layer for AI agents, chat, notifications, live dashboards, and collaboration - engineered to handle peak demand without self-managed infrastructure....
HolyCode Cloud is a cloud AI workstation with 60+ tools already installed, built for running AI coding agents unattended. Hand off a task, close your laptop, and the work continues. Processes, files and terminal scrollback survive the disconnect, and the machine suspends when idle and resumes in...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of HolyCode yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How to build a collaborative environment around your product
More videos
No HolyCode videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Ably and HolyCode.
HolyCode's answer:
The machine does not stop when you do. Most cloud dev environments are containers with an idle timer that reclaims them when nobody has typed for a while, which is exactly what a working unattended agent looks like to a timer. Here the workspace is a real VM with a persistent disk. Hand an agent a four-hour task, close your laptop, and the processes, files and terminal scrollback are still there when you come back. It suspends when idle and resumes in about a second, so always-on does not mean always-billing.
HolyCode's answer:
Three practical differences. First, nothing gets reclaimed for idleness, so long unattended agent runs actually finish. Second, every tier includes the full toolset. Tiers differ only by CPU, RAM and disk, so paying more buys horsepower rather than unlocking features. Third, you bring your own Anthropic, OpenAI or Gemini key and the provider bills you directly, with no markup on tokens.
Where it is not the right choice: if you want a free tier to try, there isn't one, because every account is a real VM that costs money from the first minute. There is a 7-day refund instead.
HolyCode's answer:
Developers running AI coding agents on real work rather than demos. Typically people who already pay for Claude, Codex or Gemini and have hit the point where the bottleneck is not the model but the machine underneath it. Many have tried tmux on a VPS and got tired of maintaining the VPS.
HolyCode's answer:
It started as an open-source Docker image for running coding agents with persistent state, which is still free and maintained at github.com/CoderLuii/HolyCode. The most common feedback was that persistence mattered most: sessions, settings and progress surviving a rebuild rather than starting over each time. The hosted version is that same image on a machine someone else maintains.
HolyCode's answer:
Fly.io machines with persistent volumes for the workspaces, Docker and Debian for the image, ttyd for the browser terminal, Node and React for the interface, and Cloudflare for the site and control plane.
Share your experience with using Ably and HolyCode. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


During this week’s AWS us-east-1 outage, Ably maintained full service continuity with no customer impact. This was our multi-region architecture working exactly as designed; error rates were negligibly low and unchanged throughout. Any... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Services like Pusher and Ably are experts in real-time messaging. They provide robust APIs for pub/sub channels, allowing you to broadcast events to clients reliably. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Ably is a real-time infrastructure platform that focuses on delivering low-latency, reliable messaging across global distributed systems. It's designed for developers building event-driven applications, including chat, but also supports... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Tracking HolyCode since Aug 2026.
When comparing Ably and HolyCode, you can also consider the following products.

Pusher is a hosted API for quickly, easily and securely adding scalable realtime functionality via WebSockets to web and mobile apps.
Compare Pusher to Ably or HolyCode:

GItHub Codespaces is a hosted remote coding environment by GitHub based on Visual Studio Codespaces integrated directly for GitHub.
Compare GitHub Codespaces to Ably or HolyCode:



PubNub is a real-time messaging system for web and mobile apps that can handle API for all platforms and push messages to any device anywhere in the world in a fraction of a second without having to worry about proxies, firewalls or mobile drop-offs.
Compare PubNub to Ably or HolyCode:

Code, create, andlearn together. Use our free, collaborative, in-browser IDE to code in 50+ languages — without spending a second on setup.
Compare replit to Ably or HolyCode: