Software Alternatives & Startups

@RISK VS FundQuill

Compare @RISK VS FundQuill and see what are their differences

@RISK

@RISK is the world's most widely used risk analysis tool.

Rating
0 reviews
FundQuill

Audit, trace and stress-test confidential Excel financial models in your desktop browser. The workbook, its formulas and its numbers never leave your computer.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $99 / Monthly (3 Devices)
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Governance, Risk And Compliance popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
49 vs 4

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

@RISK
FundQuill
Website palisade.lumivero.com fundquill.com
Pricing —
Freemium $99 / Monthly (3 Devices) Official pricing
Platforms —
SaaS Web
Company — 2026
Listed in

About @RISK and FundQuill

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

@RISK
FundQuill

No description of @RISK yet.

Every model you open in FundQuill stays on your own computer. The audit, the tracing and every recalculation happen there, so the workbook, its formulas and its numbers are never sent to a server, and we never receive them. For M&A advisors, VC and private equity associates, real estate...

Read more about FundQuill

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

@RISK 5 features
FundQuill 12 features
  • Comprehensive Risk Analysis
    @RISK provides a detailed and comprehensive risk analysis by using Monte Carlo simulation, which allows users to understand the variability and uncertainty in their models.
  • Excel Integration
    @RISK is integrated directly with Microsoft Excel, making it intuitive for users who are familiar with Excel to build their models and perform risk analysis without needing to learn a new interface.
  • Scenario Analysis
    The software allows users to perform scenario and sensitivity analysis, enabling a deeper understanding of which variables have the greatest impact on their models.
  • Reporting and Visualization Tools
    It offers a variety of tools for reporting and data visualization, making it easy to present findings to stakeholders in a clear and impactful way.
  • Custom Distributions
    @RISK provides flexibility with custom distributions, allowing users to fit their data to a wide range of probability distributions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The software can be complex for beginners or those not familiar with statistical modeling and Monte Carlo simulations, potentially requiring significant time to learn effectively.
  • Cost
    @RISK can be expensive for individual users or small businesses, which might be a barrier compared to other simpler or free alternatives.
  • Excel Dependency
    Being a tool that works within Excel, its performance and capabilities are limited by the functionalities and limitations of Excel itself.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running large simulations can be resource-intensive, requiring significant processing power and potentially leading to performance issues on less powerful hardware.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic features might be easy to grasp, mastering the advanced features and functionalities of @RISK could require extensive training and experience.
  • Integrity audit
    Finds circular references and error cells such as #REF!, #DIV/0! and #NAME? across the workbook.
  • Formula checks
    Flags inconsistent formulas and hard-coded numbers sitting where a formula should be.
  • Suggested fixes
    Proposes a fix for totals that accidentally include themselves.
  • Dependency map
    Traces any number to the cells behind it and the cells that depend on it, including circular chains.
  • What-if recalculation
    Change an assumption and watch the outputs recompute. Free, no account.
  • Scenarios and stress tests (Pro)
    Build scenarios and stress-test the assumptions the model depends on.
  • Sensitivity and tornado tables (Pro)
    See which inputs move the result most.
  • Monte Carlo simulation (Pro)
    Simulate the model to see the range of outcomes, not just one answer.
  • Signed report (Pro)
    Export a signed report that the recipient can check for free.
  • Model templates (Pro)
    20 templates for M&A and private equity, venture capital, real estate and CFO work.
  • Shared assumption libraries (Firm)
    Keep one set of assumptions the whole firm works from.
  • No upload
    The workbook, its formulas and its numbers stay on your own computer and are never sent to a server.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
@RISK
FundQuill
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing @RISK and FundQuill.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

FundQuill's answer:

Boutique M&A advisors, VC and private equity associates, real estate analysts, and fractional CFOs and finance consultants, typically in firms of one to fifty people. The common thread is that they check Excel models they are not allowed to put into a cloud tool: a pre-close LBO, a cap table, a development pro forma, a board model.

What makes your product unique?

FundQuill's answer:

FundQuill never uploads your model. The audit, the formula tracing, the what-if recalculation and the Monte Carlo runs all happen on your own computer, inside the browser you already have. That is how the product is built, not a policy setting. There is no upload step to opt out of.

For a deal team, that removes the question of whether a pre-close model can go into a cloud tool at all. It also means the work you hand over can be checked: a Pro report is signed on your device, and the person who receives it can confirm, for free and without an account, that it has not been altered and which device signed it.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

FundQuill's answer:

Against cloud spreadsheet and planning tools, your workbook simply never leaves your machine, so the confidentiality question does not come up.

Against the Excel add-ins for model auditing and simulation, there is nothing to install, which matters on a managed work laptop where adding software means an approval process. FundQuill also keeps the audit, the tracing, scenarios, sensitivity tables and Monte Carlo in one place, and its report can be checked by the recipient with a free tool, including an open-source checker that runs offline.

The free tier is a working auditor, not a trial: no account, no card, and no time limit.

What's the story behind your product?

FundQuill's answer:

FundQuill started from a narrow observation: the financial models that most need a second look are the ones that cannot be uploaded anywhere. A pre-close LBO or a cap table under NDA cannot go into a cloud spreadsheet or a chatbot, and many of the established checking tools are Excel add-ins, which a managed work laptop often will not let you install.

So we built a model auditor that runs in the browser but does all of its work on your own machine. It finds broken formulas and circular references, shows how every number is built, and recomputes the model under your own assumptions. Pro adds simulations and a signed report, so the review you hand over can be checked rather than taken on trust.

User comments

Share your experience with using @RISK and FundQuill. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to @RISK and FundQuill

When comparing @RISK and FundQuill, you can also consider the following products.