
Njalla
DigitalOcean
Microsoft Azure
Amazon EC2
Cloudzy
Linode
Contabo
VPS & Shared Web Hosting Service Packages

Managed Hosting for developers, entrepreneurs, and businesses like yours
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, 1984 Hosting seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 16 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | 1984.hosting | opalstack.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of 1984 Hosting yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using 1984 Hosting and Opalstack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


It's made by a former piratebay founder. When you buy a domain from them, they act as a middleman and keep legal ownership of the domain thus shielding your PI somewhat from legal enforcement. They claim their hosting is "In secret... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I googled "1984 vps" and came up with http://1984.hosting/. I have no idea if this is what GP is referring to. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Https://1984.hosting does exactly this. They even have made public one of the litigations against them https://litigation.1984.hosting/. Source: about 3 years ago
Tracking Opalstack since Sep 2023.
When comparing 1984 Hosting and Opalstack, you can also consider the following products.

Njalla only needs your email or a jabber address in order to register a domain name.
Compare Njalla to 1984 Hosting or Opalstack:

Simplifying cloud hosting. Deploy an SSD cloud server in 55 seconds.
Compare DigitalOcean to 1984 Hosting or Opalstack:

Windows Azure and SQL Azure enable you to build, host and scale applications in Microsoft datacenters.
Compare Microsoft Azure to 1984 Hosting or Opalstack:

Amazon Web Services offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud computing services. Free to join, pay only for what you use.
Compare Amazon EC2 to 1984 Hosting or Opalstack:

AI-first cloud servers powered by AMD EPYC and Ryzen, with pure NVMe storage, built for high performance at a lower cost.
Compare Cloudzy to 1984 Hosting or Opalstack:

We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.
Compare Linode to 1984 Hosting or Opalstack: