We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Buck2 is good.
Check the traffic stats of Buck2 on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Buck2 on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Buck2's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Buck2 on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Buck2 on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Monorepo gave you atomic cross-service changes, a single dependency graph, unified CI/CD, and zero version skew between internal libraries. The cost was large clone sizes, slower CI without build caching, complex permission models, and the need for specialized tooling like Bazel, Pants, Nx, or Buck2 to keep builds fast. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Coming from a Meta background (not speaking on behalf of Meta): "package/dependency management" - Everything is checked into a monorepo, and built with [Buck2](https://buck2.build/). There's tooling to import/update packages, but no need to reinvent pip or other package managers. Btw, Buck2 is pretty awesome and supports a ton of languages beyond python, but hasn't gotten a ton of traction outside of Meta.... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
> As for Python package management, my team is migrating to Bazel which has its own way of locking in the Python dependencies and then pulling them from a remote cache. Under Bazel, we are only re-examining the dependencies when someone proposes a change to produce the lock. It's so rare, that having a new+faster thing that does this part would not present a meaningful benefit. Have you considered Pants[0],... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
> Does anyone know of anything better than Make? Xmake https://xmake.io/ for C and C++ (I haven't use that for anything serious yet) and Buck 2 https://buck2.build/ if you need a really complex build system. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
It exists, and not just for C++: https://buck2.build/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
NOTE: I wonโt mention SBT and Leiningen here because, with all due respect, they are niche build tools. I also wonโt discuss Kobalt for the same reason (besides, itโs no longer actively maintained). Additionally, I wonโt touch upon Bazel and Buck in this context, mainly because Iโm not very familiar with them. If you have insights or comments about these tools, please feel free to share them in the comments ๐. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
There's a new build system which works on similar ideas to buck: https://buck2.build/. Source: about 3 years ago
There're tools which do this, for example https://bazel.build/, and https://buck2.build/ However they have a learning curve, which might be steep for some folks. Source: about 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Buck2 to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Buck2 good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Buck2 here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.