Table of contents
Open Source
Back In Time is an open-source software project, allowing anyone to view, modify, and contribute to its source code, which promotes transparency and community-driven development.
User-Friendly Interface
The application features a straightforward and intuitive interface that makes it accessible for users of different skill levels to configure and manage their backups efficiently.
Incremental Backups
Back In Time supports incremental backups, meaning that only changes made since the last backup are saved, which saves time and storage space.
Scheduling
The software offers detailed scheduling options, allowing users to automate their backup processes at specified intervals, which enhances convenience and ensures data is regularly backed up.
Configurable
Back In Time allows for extensive configuration options to suit individual needs, such as setting up multiple backup profiles, filtering files and directories, and defining backup interval details.
Back In Time is generally considered a good option for users who need a simple and effective backup solution on Linux. It is well-suited for both beginners and experienced users who want a no-fuss application to secure their files.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Back In Time is good.
Check the traffic stats of Back In Time on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Back In Time on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Back In Time's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Back In Time on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Back In Time on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
It is often asked by beginners how and where starting to contribute. As member of the maintenance team of Back In Time (Backup software using rsync in the back, written with Python and Qt) I would like to introduce one of our "good first issues" (#1578). Source: over 2 years ago
I'm member of the upstream maintenance team of Back In Time a rsync-based backup software. No one gets payed. No company behind hit. Even the maintainers and developers are volunteers. Source: almost 3 years ago
Back In Time is a round about 15 years old backup software using rsync in the back. I'm part of the 3rd generation maintenance team there. A lot of work in investigating and fixing issues, understanding, documenting and refactoring old code. Source: almost 3 years ago
This request is related to an Open Source project named Back In Time. Everyone there works voluntarily and unpaid. Source: almost 3 years ago
In my own project we do it more transparent. We close if there is a good reason for it. We don't close just because no one is working on something. If there are no resources to work in it now but it seems important we keep it open until it is fixed. We do use milestones and priority labels to give the users an idea about our plans. Source: about 3 years ago
I'm interested in that topic because I'm member of the maintenance team of Back In Time, the software discussed in that video. The version in video is 0.9, today Back In Time reached 1.3.3. Also interesting is that I'm the third generation of maintainers to that project. I'm not sure but 0.9 there was the fist maintainer and founder involved only. Source: about 3 years ago
I'm member of the maintenance team of Back In Time a rsync-based backup software. Source: about 3 years ago
Https://github.com/bit-team/backintime Https://backintime.readthedocs.io/en/latest/. Source: about 3 years ago
Back In Time is a project born round about the year 2008. A rsync-based backup software with a GUI for Linux. It seems that there is a new team of maintainers reanimating the project with support from the previous maintainer. It looks like it is on a good way. Source: over 3 years ago
The Timeshift developers recommend that users who want backups should look at something like backintime, because Timeshift is not a backup application. Source: over 3 years ago
If it's on another partition and you select that partition during installation, it should be OK. However, always make a backup of your Home folder/partition to an external drive. I recommend using Back In Time. Source: about 4 years ago
Well, that certainly explains it. I read a post a while ago where a KDE dev said it's impossible to turn Neon into Kubuntu and vice versa, so this would apply to Ubuntu, too. You could just try things as they are (Franken-Neon), or, if you decide to jump to Neon proper, you should backup your Home folder (be sure to back up your hidden files and folders, too, a.k.a. Dotfiles and dot folders), and if you've... Source: about 4 years ago
People need to stop recommending rsync for backups. Some reasonable, time-tested software suggestions are Back In Time, Borg+Vorta, and my minimal CLI choice, rdiff-backup. Source: about 4 years ago
I use backintime to back up files in my home directory, and use Timeshift for backing up system settings (really useful if you're messing around with your grub and fuck something up, speaking from experience). Source: over 4 years ago
I use BackInTime for userspace backups, Timeshift for system files. Source: over 4 years ago
My own backup routine is a complete system backup before and after any major Manjaro update, along with incremental backups every night. With backintime automatically taking snapshots of selected files & directories (mainly in my home directory) every 15 minutes to secure most stuff in areas where I might be making changes. Source: over 4 years ago
From my understanding, this isn't a good idea. Technically, you could install the KDE desktop, then uninstall the GNOME DE, but this would likely muck u your system with leftovers and unwanted crap. Best to make a backup of your home folder with something like BackInTime, then do a fresh install of Kubuntu. You can install your programs and then restore your home folder. Source: over 4 years ago
I have LM 19.3 on my main driver, and on it I use Back In Time - I use the older repo version instead of adding the PPA. It the past I have used the MintBackup (aka, Backup Tool) and Dรฉjร Dup (aka, Backup). MintBackup is my least favorite, but I like all three. I use Dรฉjร Dup on my LM 20.x boxes. I am pretty sure all or front-ends for rsync, and all should work with your NAS. Https://github.com/bit-team/backintime. Source: over 4 years ago
For simple, local backups on a personal machine, my favorite is Back in Time, which I've relied on for years. I've also used DejaDup, which is Ubuntu's preinstalled backup software. It's fine. Source: almost 5 years ago
Time shift is great for system files, but not great for other types. BackInTime is what I use for personal files. Works great. Source: almost 5 years ago
Anything based on rsync will do fine. E.g. BackInTime: https://github.com/bit-team/backintime. Source: about 5 years ago
Back In Time: A Community-Driven Backup Solution for Linux
Back In Time, an open-source backup software solution for Linux, has effectively carved out a niche in the crowded landscape of backup solutions, finding favor among various user demographics. This tool integrates rsync with a graphical user interface based in Python and Qt, simplifying the complex process of backup management on Linux systems. Let's explore the public opinion and core features that contribute to its standing today.
User Recommendations and Endorsements
Back In Time frequently garners recommendations in forums discussing backup solutions for Linux environments. It's recognized as an excellent tool for personal and home directory backups, often mentioned alongside or in comparison to competitors like Dรฉjร Dup and Timeshift. Users appreciate its simplicity, reliability, and the capability to handle frequent, automatic snapshots, making it a trusted choice for those needing continuous backup coverage of select files and directories.
Community-Driven Development
The development and maintenance of Back In Time reflect its roots in the Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) community. Contributions are voluntary, and the project survives on the dedication of its contributors. This ethos of community and collaboration extends beyond development; the software frequently seeks translators to make the tool accessible to non-English speakers, indicating its intent to serve a broad, international user base.
Competitive Landscape
Though it competes with options like Duplicati, Borg Backup, and Bacula, Back In Time remains a compelling choice due to its user-friendly interface and straightforward functionality. It has become particularly popular as an alternative or complement to Timeshift, the latter mainly focused on system backups rather than personal data.
Features and Functionality
Key to Back In Time's success is its balance between ease of use and flexibility. Users highlight the capability to customize directories and schedules for backup, offering control without overwhelming complexity. Its GUI is often praised for its intuitive design, which lowers the entry barrier for users with varying technical expertise. Additionally, the option for a command-line interface caters to more advanced users who prefer scripting and automation.
Community Support and Challenges
Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement. Some challenges mentioned by users include slower feature updates and occasional difficulties due to the volunteer-driven nature of the project. This necessitates patience and community input to address issues as they arise. Nonetheless, its community remains engaged and supportive, frequently discussing strategies for optimizing use and suggesting enhancements.
In conclusion, Back In Time is highly regarded for its simplicity, ease of use, and the assurance of consistent backups. Its standing is bolstered by a committed community, aligning with the open-source philosophy of collective improvement and sharing. Despite competition from more corporately-backed alternatives, it retains a strong position in the hearts of its users as a reliable, user-friendly backup solution for Linux.
Do you know an article comparing Back In Time to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Back In Time good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Back In Time here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
