Table of contents
Audacious
Audacious is an advanced audio player.
As Audacious is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
Pricing:
- Open Source
Lightweight
Audacious is designed to be a lightweight media player, using minimal system resources, which makes it ideal for systems with limited hardware capabilities.
Customizable
The player allows users to customize its interface and features extensively through plugins and skins, providing a personalized user experience.
Wide Format Support
Audacious supports a wide range of audio formats, including popular ones like MP3, FLAC, WAV, and many others, ensuring compatibility with most audio files.
Open Source
Being an open-source project, Audacious encourages community involvement and transparency in its development process, allowing users to contribute and suggest improvements.
Low Latency Playback
The player is known for its low latency playback, which is particularly beneficial for high-quality audio and real-time listening experiences.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Audacious is good.
Check the traffic stats of Audacious on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Audacious on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Audacious's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Audacious on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Audacious on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Https://audacious-media-player.org/ I'm still gleefully using Winamp skins to this day thanks to these fine people. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
You might like Audacious[0]. It loads the previously-open playlist by default, which I find a little annoying but apparently is your preference. Audacious has the bare-bones GUI of foobar2000 / deadbeef and also a plug-in architecture. https://audacious-media-player.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
I usually just use mpv since it's the simplest and most flexible. You might be looking for something like Audacious though, which is great too. Source: over 2 years ago
Audacious is a more popular media player app that supports Winamp skins and a media library. Source: over 2 years ago
This may interest you,and it is Qt,plus can be used with MPD. https://audacious-media-player.org/. Source: over 2 years ago
The new version of audacious has a vu meter and its also available to windows Https://audacious-media-player.org/. Source: over 2 years ago
Find a GUI player you like (see https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/List_of_applications#Graphical_13 for a non-exhaustive list; ISTR Audacious being mentioned as a Winamp clone) and add it to your autostart items (see https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Autostarting#On_desktop_environment_startup). Source: almost 3 years ago
Yes, Winamp works well on Linux through wine, I have been using it for a long time myself. Although recently I have also been using audacious, which runs more smoothly and is better integrated with Linux (as it is a native application) and it also has support for Winamp skins, so it's a fairly good drop-in replacement (as long as you're not relying on some esoteric plugins or file formats). Source: almost 3 years ago
Im not the parent commenter but I highly recommend audacious for linux and windows. Plays every audio format you have, doesn’t enforce a specific music library folder structure, and supports winamp skins(!) https://audacious-media-player.org/. Source: about 3 years ago
Effectively succeeded by Audacious: https://audacious-media-player.org/ ... Which is under active development/maintenance. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Check out Audacious for your tunes. Source: about 3 years ago
I used to run AIMP3 with wine. After testing some players I kept audacious. Source: over 3 years ago
No Open Source version per-se, but Audacious[1] is awfully close. It even supports classic Winamp skins AIUI. Screenshot: https://fogbeam.com/audacious.png [1]: https://audacious-media-player.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Nope. Audacious is the descendant of xmms and still supports those Winamp skins. It's also a very capable player. Source: over 3 years ago
Wasn't audacious (https://audacious-media-player.org/) supposed to be that? ;o. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I found Audacious recently and am very happy with it. Fast, low RAM use (not as low as WinAMP, but good enough), open source, multiplatform, regularly updated, modern, etc. Source: over 3 years ago
Audacious would probably be right up your alley. It seems to be heavily inspired by WinAmp, so much so that you can use classic WinAmp skins with it. Source: over 3 years ago
You mean https://audacious-media-player.org/. Source: over 3 years ago
Audacious: https://audacious-media-player.org/ Offers a WinAmp-style UI, with skin support. Screenshot: https://community.linuxmint.com/img/screenshots/audacious.png It is actively maintained with the last release being this February. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
The first version used a Pimoroni Hyperpixel 4 screen, Audacious with Winamp skin, Ready Player One fanart wallpaper and the Raspberry Pi OS Lite with XFCE. Source: almost 4 years ago
> The audacity of it! (pun intended) Fork it, call it Audacious and be done with it. Already taken by an audio related project: https://audacious-media-player.org/ I have used it for a long time. To my surprise, it is still alive and seems to have evolved a bit seeing the screenshot and it looks good, I think I'll look into it. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
Audacious, a renowned audio player descended from XMMS, has consistently been a topic of discussion within the media player ecosystem. As an open-source solution, it competes with notable alternatives such as foobar2000, Clementine, AIMP, VLC Media Player, and Winamp. Its lightweight nature and a core focus on delivering high-quality music playback through built-in presets and effects have helped it maintain a steady user base. Let's delve into the public perception and recent discourse surrounding Audacious.
One prominent feature of Audacious is its ability to support Winamp skins, which has endeared it to nostalgic users seeking familiar visual cues akin to the classic Winamp interface. This capability, coupled with its software architecture, makes Audacious a compelling option for those transitioning from or looking for a modern version of Winamp. Moreover, its integration with Linux systems is often highlighted in discussions, underscoring the application’s native compatibility and smooth performance compared to using Winamp through emulation platforms like Wine.
Audacious's support for various audio formats and its flexibility in library organization stand out, allowing users to enjoy a customizable and versatile audio experience. The aspect of plugins that extend functionality, such as lyric searches, further elevates its capabilities beyond standard offerings. Users frequently commend its simplicity and efficiency, providing essential features without imposing unnecessary complexity.
However, there is a notable mention of its somewhat outdated user interface. While some users appreciate its minimalist style, consistent with applications like foobar2000 and deadbeef, others perceive it as a potential drawback that might not appeal to users preferring modern, visually intricate applications. Despite this, the active maintenance and updates to the software seem to mitigate concerns over its aesthetic datedness, promising future improvements and sustained relevance.
Across various platforms and user setups, Audacious receives positive recommendations due to its low resource consumption and cross-platform availability. These qualities resonate with a wide audience—from users running elaborate hardware setups to those on simpler systems. The discourse highlights Audacious as a viable alternative not just for legacy users but also for individuals seeking lightweight, efficient, and open-source audio solutions.
In summary, Audacious remains highly valued for its adherence to a simple, effective design and its adaptation of features cherished by long-time users of music player software. Despite facing stiff competition and having some perceived GUI limitations, its consistent development and functional versatility secure its place as a respected choice among audio players.
Do you know an article comparing Audacious to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Audacious good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Audacious here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
