Listed in
Scalability
Amazon SQS scales automatically to handle an unlimited number of messages, ensuring that your application can support any level of demand without manual intervention.
Reliability
Amazon SQS offers guaranteed delivery of messages, with multiple copies of each message stored redundantly across multiple servers and data centers.
Flexibility
SQS supports both standard and FIFO (First In, First Out) queues, giving you the option to choose the type of queue that best suits your application's requirements.
Ease of Use
Amazon SQS is fully managed, meaning you don't need to worry about provisioning or managing infrastructure. Integration is straightforward with a well-documented API.
Cost-Effective
SQS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you only pay for the number of calls made to the API and the amount of data transferred, making it a cost-effective solution for many use cases.
Security
SQS integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) to control access. Additionally, it supports encryption of messages in transit and at rest, enhancing security.
Amazon SQS is a robust and versatile messaging service that is well-suited for a wide range of use cases. Its scalability, reliability, and tight integration with other AWS services make it a strong choice for both small and large applications.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Amazon SQS is good.
Check the traffic stats of Amazon SQS on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Amazon SQS on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Amazon SQS's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Amazon SQS on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Amazon SQS on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
For cloud-managed queues: Amazon SQS has a built-in DLQ mechanism where a source queue is configured with a redrive policy that specifies a maximum receive count and a DLQ target. Google Cloud Pub/Sub provides a similar dead letter policy. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Sync vs Async Inference: Sync for real-time (InvokeModel); async for batch/long-running (InvokeModelWithResponseStream). Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) for async patterns. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
For async pipelines handling thousands of documents per hour, replace direct function calls with queue messages. Each stage worker pulls a job from Redis or Amazon SQS, executes the API call, ACKs on success, and publishes a completion event to the next stage's queue. If a worker crashes mid-job, the unACKed message re-queues and the idempotency key prevents re-processing a document that's already been completed. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
These services integrate seamlessly to run chat applications; however, to achieve production-grade functionality, you will need additional services: Amazon Cognito, AWS CloudWatch, SQS, etc. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Using an API gateway with essential API gateway features can help in designing for self-healing and resilience. AWS's Simple Queue Service (SQS) exemplifies this approach, maintaining 99.99% availability with minimal human oversight through comprehensive automatic recovery mechanisms. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
We can configure S3 to send an event to a configured target service every time a new file is uploaded to the bucket. It's called S3 event notification, and we configure the s3:ObjectCreated:* event type. In this case, the event destination is a standard SQS queue. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Let's say that StackA contains an S3 bucket and an SQS queue. This is StackA's current template:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
For service-to-service architectures, we can implement various retry solutions, such as sending an error message to an SQS queue for Lambda to retrieve and process. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Amazon SQS — Fully managed message queuing for microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
When I took my first AWS trainings (AWS Cloud Practitioner and AWS Developer Associate), I was really impressed with the capabilities that AWS offers. One of them was the strong scalability capabilities - the feature that caused problems in some past projects. Since AWS SQS is a managed message queue, I thought it would be a good fit for my use case. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Event Routers: Services like Amazon SQS (A managed message queuing), Amazon SNS (A pub/sub messaging), AWS Step Functions (An orchestrate serverless workflows) and Amazon EventBridge (A serverless event bus) act as event routers, establishing the paths and flow for messages within the architecture. They enable seamless handling and distribution of events, ensuring that each message reaches its intended destination... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
SQS - 1 million messaging queue requests. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
The last stage is productionizing the model. The goal of this phase is to create a system to process each image/video, gather the relevant features and inputs to the models, integrate the models into a hosting service, and relay the corresponding model predictions to downstream consumers like the MCF system. We used an existing Safety service, Content Classification Service, to implement the aforementioned system... Source: almost 3 years ago
For context; the web application is built with React and TypeScript which makes calls to an AppSync API that makes use of the Lambda and DynamoDB datasources. We use Step Functions to orchestrate the flow of events for complex processing like purchasing and renewing policies, and we use S3 and SQS to process document workloads. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Amazon SQS is a fully managed message queue service that provides a reliable and scalable solution for asynchronous messaging between distributed components and microservices. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
The key service that publishes messages to its subscribers is Simple Notification Service (SNS). We can add multiple different subscribers to a topic, for example, email addresses, phone numbers, or SQS queues. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
Thanks again - will AWS SQS be a good choice for this queuing?https://aws.amazon.com/sqs/. Source: over 3 years ago
The use of queues such as Amazon SQS, RabbitMQ or Apache Kafka has been a widely accepted solution for some time. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
You're better off with something really, really straightforward, like AWS Simple Queue Service or SQS or RabbitMQ, which are two very popular message queues. (The "MQ" part means Message Queue, in case that wasn't obvious). There are a lot of these out there, including ActiveMQ, IronMQ, and others. Pick the one that makes the most sense to you. Source: over 3 years ago
When we use a queue which the function polls for messages, we usually apply some a retry mechanism. After an error has occurred, the function will attempt to get the task from the endpoint again with the same payload or parameters. If we are lucky, the call will be successful for the second or third time. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
Amazon Simple Queue System or SQS is a fully managed message queue built for distributed and serverless platforms. Out of the box, it allows you to send, store and receive any volume of messages between services. It has a free and paid tier. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) has garnered a significant public footprint and is generally well-regarded in the tech community as a robust solution for message queuing needs. Positioned as a fully managed service under Amazon Web Services (AWS), SQS is tailored for use in distributed systems, serverless applications, and microservices architectures. Its adoption and appreciation by developers are bolstered by several notable attributes and use case alignments as observed in various technical discussions and articles.
Fully Managed Service: SQS is praised for being a fully managed service, removing much of the operational overhead from developers and teams. This characteristic aligns with AWS's general philosophy of reducing infrastructure concerns, allowing developers to focus primarily on application logic and business needs.
Flexibility and Integration: One of SQS's standout features is its ability to integrate smoothly with other AWS services and its support for use across various programming languages through the AWS SDK. This flexibility makes it an attractive choice for developers who are already embedded in the AWS ecosystem and appreciate seamless interoperability.
Durability and Availability: SQS ensures message durability and offers robust availability levels, reportedly maintaining a 99.99% availability. Coupled with automatic recovery mechanisms, it aids in building resilient applications that require high fault tolerance.
Scalability and Simplicity: SQS is recognized for its impressive scalability, which can handle substantial message volumes without degradation in performance. Developers appreciate its straightforward configuration and maintenance simplicity, as it simplifies the handling of asynchronous messaging without complex setups.
Use Cases and Application: Use cases frequently highlighted include integration with serverless architectures, error handling strategies, and event-driven applications. SQS is often used alongside other AWS services like AWS Lambda, Step Functions, SNS, and S3, supporting complex workflows and event routing.
When compared to competitors like Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ, and Apache ActiveMQ, SQS stands out for those who prioritize ease of use, simplicity, and integration with AWS services. While Kafka is often mentioned for high throughput and commitment ordering, SQS's managed nature makes it preferable in environments where managing complex clusters or brokers is not ideal.
The reception of Amazon SQS is predominantly positive in public discussions and technical blog posts. Its ease of use, reliability, and integration capabilities with other AWS services position it as a favorite for businesses that utilize AWS infrastructure. However, users may consider alternatives like Kafka for use cases requiring specific features such as real-time analytics or complex streaming.
In summary, Amazon SQS remains a valued tool for asynchronous messaging needs within the AWS ecosystem, providing a balance of managed operations, ease of integration, and strong performance metrics that align with modern cloud-native application architectures. As organizations increasingly move toward microservices and serverless computing, SQS's role seems likely to continue growing in relevance and utility.
Do you know an article comparing Amazon SQS to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Amazon SQS good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Amazon SQS here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
