This page is designed to help you find out whether Amazon Glacier is good and if it is the right choice for you.
Listed in
Cost-effective
Amazon Glacier offers a low-cost storage option for data that is infrequently accessed, making it suitable for archival and backup solutions.
Durability
Built on the AWS infrastructure, Amazon Glacier provides high durability by automatically storing data across multiple facilities.
Scalability
Amazon Glacier is highly scalable, accommodating various workloads and growing storage needs without capacity constraints.
Data Security
AWS provides several security features for Glacier, such as integration with AWS IAM, encryption in transit and at rest, and compliance with various regulations.
Integration with AWS services
Amazon Glacier can be seamlessly integrated with other AWS services like S3, providing a cohesive and comprehensive data management solution.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Amazon Glacier is good.
Check the traffic stats of Amazon Glacier on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Amazon Glacier on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Amazon Glacier's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Amazon Glacier on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Amazon Glacier on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Experience any issues, please reach out to us via AWS Support for help [4]. [1] https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
Storage Tiering: Move older backups to cheaper storage like S3 Glacier to save money. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Do you think that Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive is good for digital preservation of my ~300GB video stash? Source: about 3 years ago
Easy - I know about S3 Glaciers but I'd prefer something that doesn't require going through a number of tutorials to use. Source: over 3 years ago
The nice thing about AWS is that you could use Amazon S3 Glacier storage if you can live with slower retrieval (5-12 hours). It's really cheap and excellent for non-changing requirements which would be good for media that isn't updating regularly. https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/. Source: over 3 years ago
I would recommend Amazon S3 Glacier https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/ . You can explicitly upload files there via web interface or many 3rd party clients. You can also upload to more than one geographical location. Source: over 3 years ago
What you want, is Amazon Glacier. You're not talking about Backup here, you're talking about Archival. Source: over 3 years ago
AWS S3's Deep Glacier To save even more on long-lived archive storage such as compliance archives and digital media preservation, choose S3 Glacier Deep Archive, the lowest cost storage in the cloud with data retrieval within twelve hours. Source: over 3 years ago
The Amazon S3 Glacier storage classes are purpose-built for data archiving and you can choose from three archive storage classes optimized for different access patterns and storage duration. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
If you say you need object storage, then blob is the way to go. It will be easy to setup if you already use Azure. But do setup a backup policy. Also if I were you I would use a second provider to avoid vendor lock in. Also you should look into a cold storage solution with a different provider (not Azure) for secondary backups (e.g. See https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/). Source: almost 4 years ago
You do realise that your fancy cloud uses tape as well right - https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/ And btw I am gen x, boomers technically predate tape. The good thing about your generation however is that with your disposable storage and disposable culture no one will remember you. While our VHS records are still alive and working fine same with the film the boomers used to use. Source: almost 4 years ago
Does anyone use Amazon's long term storage like Glacier? https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/. Source: almost 4 years ago
You could put the stuff you are just archiving in Amazon cold storage. https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/ - the deep archive category which is not live access to your data is like 95 cents per terabyte and month, last I checked. That's 360 bucks a year. Source: about 4 years ago
There may be a point for some to employ cloud storage like the Amazon S3 Glacier option. Source: about 4 years ago
"S3 Glacier" - the storage class for S3 - uses the S3 API, and is the one they seem to want you to use. It's easier to use via Lifecycle Policies or Intelligent Tiering. Objects can be up to 5 TiB. See https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/. Source: about 4 years ago
AWS Glacier Deep Archive costs about $1/TB/month and is highly redundant, so for cold storage and DR is perfect for this. Shamirs secret sharing is a cool tech for breaking up secret data between people to allow the reconstruction of a secret key. Links: https://keepass.info/ - cross platform password safe https://authy.com/ - Free 2FA with backup service https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/ - Info... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Azure and AWS both will easily store this much, you just need to organize it into separate buckets/storage accounts. If you don't need to access them often (read: weeks between accessing, and you know 48 hours ahead of time that you'll need it), the cheapest option is Deep Glacier Storage. Source: over 4 years ago
You may be interested in this, https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/. Source: over 4 years ago
Glacier is just a storage setting for individual files on S3, support was right. Your backups are sent to S3 with a storage class setting. Source: over 4 years ago
If what you want is purely a backup, and you won't be accessing the data unless something needs to be restored, then look into the AWS deep storage options like Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive (https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/). Source: almost 5 years ago
Correct. This is the cheapest hot/cool cloud storage I know. Cheaper than that would be Azure Archive or AWS Glacier since they cost $0.00099 per month for 1GB, but it takes a while to retrieve data back. If you need a long-term archival, their solutions are good for the job. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/storage/blobs/ Https://aws.amazon.com/s3/glacier/. Source: almost 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Amazon Glacier to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Amazon Glacier good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Amazon Glacier here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.