Based on our record, Wiki.js seems to be a lot more popular than GitBook. While we know about 68 links to Wiki.js, we've tracked only 5 mentions of GitBook. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Congrats on launching! Quick question: is this closer to WikiJS (https://js.wiki/), TinaCMS (https://tina.io/), Docusaurus (https://docusaurus.io/), or something else? - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Wiki.js is a self hosted, open source Wiki that has a lot of awesome functionality. Unfortunately it's lacking some small, but important UI features, like a light box, to enlarge downsized images to it's full size. And unless you want to add a link to each image, to open it in a new tab, you would probably go for a modal view here. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Https://js.wiki/ is what we’ve decided to go with at my company. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Can't think of anything that meets all the criteria, there's always some compromise, which might just be the way it is. For example I could 'self-host' otterwiki or wiki.js on a VPS for a pretty small monthly fee, which I could also use for other stuff that doesn't make sense for a home lab, but then I also need to deal with security since it's hosted on the internet. Or I could self-host and just accept that... Source: over 1 year ago
I love PlantUML. I was always fond of it in my early days as a software engineer and still use it today, along with all the various ways to draw diagrams out there, whether it's through a web tool like draw.io or Miro or through markup like PlantUML and Mermaid. Some stuff I'd like to share with the rest: - PlantUML's default style has improved since the days of red/brown borders, pale yellow boxes, drop shadows... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
TL,DR: LaunchDarkly is great for B2C companies. Bucket is for B2B SaaS products, like GitBook — a modern, AI-integrated documentation platform. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Addison Schultz, Developer Relations Lead at GitBook, puts it simply:. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Good question that led to insightful responses. I would like to bring GitBook (https://gitbook.com) too to the comparison notes (no affiliation). They, too, focus on the collaborative, 'similar-to-git-workflow', and versioned approach towards documentation. Happy to see variety in the 'docs' tools area, and really appreciate it being FOSS. Looking forward to trying out Kalmia on some project soon. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
You can have both a landing page (e.g.: www.your-project.dev) and a documentation website (e.g.: docs.your-project.dev). For creating documentation website GitBook is better fit than Gitlanding. GitBook is free for open source Projects (you just need to issue a request). - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
GitBook is a collaborative documentation tool that allows anyone to document anything—such as products and APIs—and share knowledge through a user-friendly online platform. According to GitBook, “GitBook is a flexible platform for all kinds of content and collaboration.” It provides a single unified workspace for different users to create, manage and share content without using multiple tools. For example:. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
DokuWiki - DokuWiki is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database.
Docusaurus - Easy to maintain open source documentation websites
TiddlyWiki - a non-linear personal web notebook
MkDocs - Project documentation with Markdown.
MediaWiki - MediaWiki is a free software wiki package written in PHP, originally for use on Wikipedia.
ReadMe - A collaborative developer hub for your API or code.