Software Alternatives & Reviews

useHooks(🐠) VS Svix

Compare useHooks(🐠) VS Svix and see what are their differences

useHooks(🐠) logo useHooks(🐠)

One new React Hook recipe every day

Svix logo Svix

The enterprise ready webhooks service, open-source and in the cloud.
  • useHooks(🐠) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17
  • Svix Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-13

Svix offers both an open source and hosted version of Webhooks as a Service. We make it extremely simple for API providers to offer a webhook service to their users without needing to design and maintain the complex infrastructure needed to deploy webhooks at scale.

Svix

Website
svix.com
$ Details
freemium
Platforms
Node JS Python Go Ruby JavaScript Java PHP

useHooks(🐠) videos

No useHooks(🐠) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Svix videos

Webhook Architecture Design

More videos:

  • Review - Are These Balisongs WORTH IT?? - Svix Zephyr & Gale REVIEW
  • Review - The Squid Triton KILLER?? - Svix Terra Balisong Review
  • Review - Svix Terra Review by Mr. RidonKuluous πŸͺ„πŸͺ„

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to useHooks(🐠) and Svix)
Developer Tools
56 56%
44% 44
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
APIs
0 0%
100% 100
JavaScript Framework
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using useHooks(🐠) and Svix. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, useHooks(🐠) seems to be a lot more popular than Svix. While we know about 20 links to useHooks(🐠), we've tracked only 1 mention of Svix. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

useHooks(🐠) mentions (20)

  • Adding a real feature to a project πŸ§›
    The very first one I came across was a package called useHooks. It looked like a really cool package with tonnes of hooks to use, and useQueue was one of them. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Thoughts on useEffect ?
    There are a bunch of library custom hooks, sometimes they encapsulate logic better, you should prefer them or build your own instead. Source: 10 months ago
  • Is using both observer.unobserve and observer.disconnect redundant
    It’s been some time since I’ve worked with intersection observer, so I’m not entirely sure of the answer in this instance. That said, something I tend to do when I run into something like this is look at an implementation that already exists from something like usehooks.com. I find a reference implementation to be a useful sanity check for this sort of thing. Source: about 1 year ago
  • What library or tool is causing you the most pain right now?
    That is the case for many custom hooks you could build. Sure, you can find libraries implementing those for you, but it doesn't change the fact that React apps still relies a lot on useEffect hook. Source: about 1 year ago
  • React hooks with real-world project examples
    A collection of useful React hooks by the community: https://usehooks.com/. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

Svix mentions (1)

  • Show HN: Open-Source Webhooks Gateway for Platform Engineers
    Hello! Love it! How would you say you compare to and differentiate from https://svix.com? - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing useHooks(🐠) and Svix, you can also consider the following products

Deco IDE - Best IDE for building React Native apps

Hookdeck - Hookdeck makes it simple to build and deploy reliable, testable, and debuggable applications that rely on webhooks.

React Native Desktop - Build OS X desktop apps using React Native

Webhook Wizard - Quickly build and manage Webhooks Webhook delivery with flexibility, reliability, monitoring and debugging.

NativeBase - Experience the awesomeness of React Native without the pain

Webhook.site - Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.