Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

useHooks(🐠) VS Webhook.site

Compare useHooks(🐠) VS Webhook.site and see what are their differences

useHooks(🐠) logo useHooks(🐠)

One new React Hook recipe every day

Webhook.site logo Webhook.site

Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.
  • useHooks(🐠) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17
  • Webhook.site Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-30

With Webhook.site, you instantly get a unique, random URL and e-mail address that you can use to test and debug Webhooks, HTTP requests and emails, as well as to create your own workflows using the Custom Actions graphical editor or WebhookScript–a simple scripting language, to transform, validate and process HTTP requests.

What are people using it for?

  • Receive Webhooks without needing an internet-facing Web server
  • Send Webhooks to a server that's behind a firewall or private subnet
  • Transforming Webhooks into other formats, and re-sending them to different systems
  • Connect different APIs that aren't compatible
  • Building contact forms that send emails
  • Instantly build APIs without needing infrastructure

Native integrations include:

  • Google Sheets
  • Dropbox
  • Discord
  • Slack
  • AWS S3 and CloudFront
  • SSH
  • FTP(S)

useHooks(🐠)

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Webhook.site

$ Details
freemium $14.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Browser REST API Cross Platform Python Windows Mac OSX Linux Command Line Interface
Release Date
2016 March

useHooks(🐠) features and specs

  • Comprehensive Resource
    useHooks provides a wide range of hooks with clear explanations and examples, making it a great resource for developers who want to learn about React Hooks or need a quick reference.
  • Easy to Understand
    The website is designed to be easy to navigate, with simple and straightforward examples. This makes it accessible to both beginner and experienced developers who are looking for practical implementations of hooks.
  • Community-Driven
    The useHooks site and its associated GitHub repository often incorporate contributions from the React community, ensuring a diverse and up-to-date set of hooks that cover a wide array of use cases.

Possible disadvantages of useHooks(🐠)

  • Limited Depth
    While useHooks provides a good overview and practical examples, it might not delve deeply into complex use cases or advanced hook usage that some developers may require for intricate applications.
  • Not Official Documentation
    useHooks is a third-party resource and not the official React documentation from Facebook, so while it can be extremely helpful, it might not always reflect the most up-to-date practices as per the official standards.
  • Dependency on External Content
    Being a community-driven project, the variety and quality of hooks available may depend on contributed content, which means there might be inconsistencies or varying levels of completeness across different hooks.

Webhook.site features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Webhook.site provides an extremely user-friendly interface, allowing users to easily create and manage webhook URLs without any technical overhead.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    It allows users to monitor incoming HTTP requests in real time, facilitating quick debugging and validation of webhooks.
  • Customization
    Users can customize webhook responses and request headers, making it versatile for various testing scenarios.
  • Temporarily Generated URLs
    Webhook.site generates unique, temporary URLs for testing, which is useful for preventing conflicts and collisions in a multi-user environment.
  • Persistence
    Webhook.site retains the payload data for a certain period, allowing users to review past submissions and data history.
  • Free Tier
    It offers a free tier that is sufficient for basic usage and testing, making it accessible for individual developers and small projects.

Possible disadvantages of Webhook.site

  • Limited Free Features
    The free tier has limitations, such as a cap on the number of requests and retention period, which may not be sufficient for large-scale or extended testing.
  • Data Retention Limits
    Payload data and request logs are stored for a limited time, which might be inconvenient for long-term projects that require persistent data.
  • Security
    While temporary URLs enhance security, there is still some risk involved in exposing potentially sensitive webhook data to a third-party service.
  • Integration Complexity
    Integrating Webhook.site with certain complex systems may require additional setup and configuration, potentially increasing the initial workload.
  • Feature Limitations
    Advanced features and higher limits are part of the paid plan, which might not be ideal for budget-constrained projects.

useHooks(🐠) videos

No useHooks(🐠) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Webhook.site videos

Webhook.site Custom Actions Demo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to useHooks(🐠) and Webhook.site)
Developer Tools
17 17%
83% 83
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
APIs
9 9%
91% 91
JavaScript Framework
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using useHooks(🐠) and Webhook.site. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webhook.site should be more popular than useHooks(🐠). It has been mentiond 75 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

useHooks(🐠) mentions (22)

  • React Hooks Essentials
    If you're interested in diving deeper into hooks or exploring useful custom hooks for your projects, I highly recommend checking out UseHooks.com. It’s a fantastic resource with tons of practical custom hooks that you can use and learn from. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • React Custom Hooks: Crafting Reusable and Clean Code Like a Pro
    // https://usehooks.com/useLocalStorage Import { useState } from 'react'; // Hook Function useLocalStorage(key, initialValue) { // State to store our value // Pass initial state function to useState so logic is only executed once const [storedValue, setStoredValue] = useState(() => { if (typeof window === 'undefined') { return initialValue; } try { // Get from local storage by key ... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Adding a real feature to a project πŸ§›
    The very first one I came across was a package called useHooks. It looked like a really cool package with tonnes of hooks to use, and useQueue was one of them. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Thoughts on useEffect ?
    There are a bunch of library custom hooks, sometimes they encapsulate logic better, you should prefer them or build your own instead. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is using both observer.unobserve and observer.disconnect redundant
    It’s been some time since I’ve worked with intersection observer, so I’m not entirely sure of the answer in this instance. That said, something I tend to do when I run into something like this is look at an implementation that already exists from something like usehooks.com. I find a reference implementation to be a useful sanity check for this sort of thing. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Webhook.site mentions (75)

  • Midjourney Imagine API Application and Usage
    ## Asynchronous Callback Since generating images with Midjourney requires a waiting period, this API is also designed by default for long wait mode. However, in certain scenarios, long waits may incur additional resource overhead, so this API also provides an asynchronous Webhook callback method. When the image generation is successful or fails, the result will be sent to the specified Webhook callback URL via an... - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
  • Part 1: Master Authentication and Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) with Kinde and Convex in a File-Sharing Application
    You can also use tools like webhook.site to test your webhook and see the type of payload it sends. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Exploring Async Deepgram API: Speech-to-Text using Python
    You can use for sample call back URL for testing. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Creating a Websocket server in Hono with Durable Objects
    We are going to build a simple Webhook inspection service, a similar/simplified version to webhook.site or the one that is available in our own Fiberplane Studio. This service will:. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • How to use razorpay api and integrate payment gateway
    To generate CALLBACK_URL and CANCEL_URL, you use this simple website to test the callback. Https://webhook.site/. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing useHooks(🐠) and Webhook.site, you can also consider the following products

Deco IDE - Best IDE for building React Native apps

MockServer - Easy mocking of any system you integrate with via HTTP or HTTPS.

React Native Desktop - Build OS X desktop apps using React Native

Beeceptor - Unblock yourself from API dependencies, and build & integrate with APIs fast. Beeceptor helps you build a mock Rest API in a few seconds.

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Request inspector - Debug web hooks, http clients