Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Unity Multiplayer VS Reactor Multiplayer Engine

Compare Unity Multiplayer VS Reactor Multiplayer Engine and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Unity Multiplayer logo Unity Multiplayer

Create real-time, networked games.

Reactor Multiplayer Engine logo Reactor Multiplayer Engine

Reactor is a fully server-authoritative multiplayer system which includes integrated hosting and orchestration as well as the most efficient networking stack available.
  • Unity Multiplayer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-17
  • Reactor Multiplayer Engine Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-11

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Unity Multiplayer and Reactor Multiplayer Engine)

Unity Multiplayer

Reactor Multiplayer Engine

Developer Tools
79 79%
Developer Tools
21% 21
Game Development
85 85%
Game Development
15% 15
Game Engine
63 63%
Game Engine
37% 37
App Development
76 76%
App Development
24% 24

User comments

Share your experience with using Unity Multiplayer and Reactor Multiplayer Engine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Unity Multiplayer should be more popular than Reactor Multiplayer Engine. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Unity Multiplayer mentions (2)

  • 3D models, avatars, gestures
    Unity is what they are using, I just know from seeing it in the browser code and researched it a little last year. https://unity.com/solutions/build-backend. Source: over 1 year ago
  • I teach Unreal. I had an easier time making my game in LittleBigPlanet. That cannot be right, what am I missing.
    I never said that Unreal is bad for non BRs, just that it is very good for BRs. The amount of work they put into making Fortnite work as well as it does puts it way above anything else for large match based shooters. I agree that Unity's old multiplayer code was an absolute mess, and I would have previously suggested using a third party solution. I was saying that I've heard good things about their new multiplayer... Source: about 2 years ago

Reactor Multiplayer Engine mentions (1)

  • Which multiplayer solution are you using?
    Here is their website. Reach out to them saying you want to try Reactor if you want to use it KinematicSoup Technologies Inc. Source: about 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Unity Multiplayer and Reactor Multiplayer Engine, you can also consider the following products

Photon Engine - Independent networking engine and multiplayer platform.

Steamworks - Steamworks is a set of tools and services that help game developers and publishers build their games and get the most out of distributing on Steam.

Nakama - Nakama is an open-source distributed social and realtime server for games and apps.

PlayFab - PlayFab is a backend platform for games, delivering powerful real-time tools and services for LiveOps.

Xbox Live Creators Program - Microsoft Game Stack can help you find the right mix of tools and services to fit your game development needs.

Colyseus - Multiplayer Game Server for Node.js. Focus on the gameplay instead of networking.

Loading...